Prius

The ignorance of people on the road continues to blow my mind. Prime example: Most Prius/Corolla/Sentra drivers exceed 50 miles a day while my commute is exactly 15 roundtrip. Tell me who is really harming the environment more? For this reason, I make it a point to downshift, rev, etc next to 'economy cars' who are clearly tree hugging hippies

X100
Human influence on climate change is well documented and proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Just because a handful of educated quacks say 'they're not convinced' doesn't invalidate the thousands upon thousands of studies that prove otherwise.
If you believe dinosaurs burnt billions of cubic meters of fuels (per year for over a hundred years) for their electricity and manufacturing, well then you should find some people who agree at www.theworldisflat.com.
The environmental impact of the Corvette is actually about average for road cars.
Plenty of real information is available for those who would like to intelligently discuss the topic.
As far as the performance of the Prius, it's actually not a bad car. It's certainly nothing like a Corvette, but with both the electric and gas propulsion, they have plenty of power for the average driver off the line. I'd personally never own one, since it's too much of a 'generic' car.
I like my cars like I like good art work, to inspire emotion.
I will tell you that many highly credentialed PhDs (Sandia has 1000+ of them, mostly in engineering, EE, physics and math) are very skeptical of the claims made by the environazis and liberal think tanks.
The liberals have been guilty of “cooking the books” so many times to achieve the viewpoint that suits their goals that they’re not believable. Don
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts






Right click and save on the pic though.
I will tell you that many highly credentialed PhDs (Sandia has 1000+ of them, mostly in engineering, EE, physics and math) are very skeptical of the claims made by the environazis and liberal think tanks.
The liberals have been guilty of “cooking the books” so many times to achieve the viewpoint that suits their goals that they’re not believable. Don

I will tell you that many highly credentialed PhDs (Sandia has 1000+ of them, mostly in engineering, EE, physics and math) are very skeptical of the claims made by the environazis and liberal think tanks.
The liberals have been guilty of “cooking the books” so many times to achieve the viewpoint that suits their goals that they’re not believable. Don
Next time you start your car. Make sure to take a deep whiff of that exhaust. And try to convince yourself again that "global warming" is non-existent.
Next time you start your car. Make sure to take a deep whiff of that exhaust. And try to convince yourself again that "global warming" is non-existent.





Next time you start your car. Make sure to take a deep whiff of that exhaust. And try to convince yourself again that "global warming" is non-existent.
Preach it to them ya tree hugger.
I will tell you that many highly credentialed PhDs (Sandia has 1000+ of them, mostly in engineering, EE, physics and math) are very skeptical of the claims made by the environazis and liberal think tanks.
The liberals have been guilty of “cooking the books” so many times to achieve the viewpoint that suits their goals that they’re not believable. Don
Regardless of where you sit on the topic, we'll all see the effects (or lack thereof) within the next 20-30 years. One of the more recent studies was about the acceptance of topics that span timeframes that are difficult for the average person to personally witness. It was interesting that acceptance of climate change is starting to increase in the central US, which is credited to personal experience of 'unusual extremes' by the people who live there. Regardless of the climate change topic, you have to admit that people are more likely to support things if they have personal experience.
If you're a fan of science, there was a great episode of the new Cosmos show that talked about the use of lead in gasoline. It covers a wide range of topics, and briefly touches on climate change since the methods most commonly used are the same methods proven in the discussions about the use of lead in gasoline.
Human influence on climate change is well documented and proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Just because a handful of educated quacks say 'they're not convinced' doesn't invalidate the thousands upon thousands of studies that prove otherwise.
If you believe dinosaurs burnt billions of cubic meters of fuels (per year for over a hundred years) for their electricity and manufacturing, well then you should find some people who agree at www.theworldisflat.com.
The environmental impact of the Corvette is actually about average for road cars.
Plenty of real information is available for those who would like to intelligently discuss the topic.
As far as the performance of the Prius, it's actually not a bad car. It's certainly nothing like a Corvette, but with both the electric and gas propulsion, they have plenty of power for the average driver off the line. I'd personally never own one, since it's too much of a 'generic' car.
I like my cars like I like good art work, to inspire emotion.
Back on topic, I totally agree about the Prius' good looks (or lack thereof). I'd never own one in its current form just because I really think that it's a boring looking car, and yes, I do put some value in form as much as function. The car is Toyota in its most typical element. I do have a neighbor who owns one who loves it for what it's worth and he even said that it'll surprise you with how fast it gets off a line. I'm sure that it's not Corvette territory, but it's not what you'd expect. I might have to go for a ride with him sometime and really get a demo of it if he's willing. I'm not sure that i'll get another car though since my Vette is my DD and I kind of like it that way. I bought it to drive it!
Must have been a Prius owner driving his other car?
















