When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I voted no failure on my 2015 with 6700 miles but it upshifts hard when it's cold so I usually use the paddles to shift up and it generally downshifts ok as I slow down. Don't know how many others do the same. A few times as it has been downshifting if I'm doing a rolling stop and I accelerate there is a sudden hard shift and when it does that I usually back off. So something is going on, for sure.
Please explain? It's a smaller segment of total ownership, sure, but how is it skewed or how will it skew the results?
How would this be different than any poll ever taken, by anyone, anywhere, ever?
Just sayin bro, some praise consumer report polls when favorable, but dis a forum poll when not favorable. I don't get it, but who knows.
To be a statistically valid poll you'd have to choose who responds to the be sure it's a representative cross section of C7 owners. When it's a voluntary poll on an open anonymous forum like this you don't have any info about the respondents. Forums like this typically attract more avid enthusiasts, and definitely attract people with problems more than those without problems. While a poll like this is interesting it carries no statistical validity whatsoever.
From what I've seen, this forum's members are not indicative of the average Corvette driver.
Heck, the fact that the wave is apparently fading is proof positive.
Not a bro, BTW.
How so? ...What is an "average Corvette driver"? And exactly how would these "not indicative of average Vette driver" member's votes be skewed or cause a skewed poll?
all due respect, your claim is baseless. There are as many or more GM homers on here for every claimed "hater" that may vote negatively.
Hell, even that dbag black and white, although a dbag, did have transmission problems and would deserve to vote (ONCE) accordingly.
Originally Posted by Steve_R
While a poll like this is interesting it carries no statistical validity whatsoever.
And BTW, owc6 is not a bro.
The same argument can made about all polls, see recent election by polls that were supposedly "statistically valid".
I agree on the enthusiasts part, but not on the "I joined and post only because I have problems with my C7" point.
I would bet my house the by a mile majority of members on this forum joined because they are enthusiasts, not because they had problems.
Last edited by Steve Garrett; Jan 7, 2017 at 03:43 PM.
Reason: Merged Posts-please use the Multi-Quote button (middle icon) in the lower right hand corner of each post to make your response look like this.
Sorry-I can't see who voted and what they voted for.....
Steven, can you change someones vote? Someone voted for the 2017 TC failure, and after looking at his recent posts, he has stated that he has a 2016 C7 that had issues. Not a huge deal and 1 will not skew anything as this is far from scientific, just fun data to look at.
The person I spoke of had the same screen name in the 2015 failure category and the 2017 no failure category. There is something screwy about how the polling feature here calculates percentages.
But you would have to use more than one screen name too. One name one vote?
If you start a poll it's up to you whether a person can vote for multiple choices or only one. This poll was set up to allow more than one vote per person, which is why it adds up to more than 100%.