Range Technology 8.4







I have a 2016 built 10/2015 and a very early Range Version 7.4 and had the same intermittent problems at first using it in 2015.
Once it locked in 4th gear, and once the engine would not start.
At no time did it throw a code though.
Then I found it worked fine starting the car before turning on the Range.
I also tried turning it Off and On, "while driving", and it still works fine.
This was before more people were using the Range and posting problems.
So, it doesn't matter when you turn it off.
The car doesn't like what it sees during the start up procedure with the Range turned on first.
And GM is known to make changes to ECM boot up/run procedure with new MY cars.
I think that's why some Updated Range Versions work fine in some year models and not in others.
Range is updating their Versions, but GM is also updating things.
It seems all the Range Versions work fine unless it's turned on before starting the car.

I have a 2016 built 10/2015 and a very early Range Version 7.4 and had the same intermittent problems at first using it in 2015.
Once it locked in 4th gear, and once the engine would not start.
At no time did it throw a code though.
Then I found it worked fine starting the car before turning on the Range.
I also tried turning it Off and On, "while driving", and it still works fine.
This was before more people were using the Range and posting problems.
So, it doesn't matter when you turn it off.
The car doesn't like what it sees during the start up procedure with the Range turned on first.
And GM is known to make changes to ECM boot up/run procedure with new MY cars.
I think that's why some Updated Range Versions work fine in some year models and not in others.
Range is updating their Versions, but GM is also updating things.
It seems all the Range Versions work fine unless it's turned on before starting the car.






The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts











Yep, It ain't rocket surgery to do this. There's gotta be a tach reading coming out of the ODB so turn it on 10 seconds after the tach reading is greater than 0.0. Same delio with the parasitic power drain - detect when the car is running and then activate the circuitry.
The fact that this isn't fixed after all the complaints is laziness on the vendor's part. Software fixes don't seem to be getting the job done, so this may involve a hardware change and he has thousands of these things in a warehouse already paid for that he can't send back.






That was yesterday, I sent them emails detailing it, we'll see but I'm guessing they are a little ways out from another beta.
They told me:
"The repeating CEL you've been seeing in your 'Vette is the same kind of issue other '17s were showing with the 8.3's. Since exchanging out their modules, the feedback has been more than encouraging for everyone. "
Not sure how they think they know what CEL's I'm getting because I have not given them any data, but maybe that's why they keep missing a fix!
They also said they had one of their engineers do some extensive data logging on a 17 Silverado that continues to have issues, but don't think that necessarily applies to us. Seems like that is what they need to do on my car :-)


Regular Users should not be guinea pigs for an already released product's software. Beta testers should go through the trials and tribulations of getting it correct. Just my opinion...
Elmer





Regular Users should not be guinea pigs for an already released product's software. Beta testers should go through the trials and tribulations of getting it correct. Just my opinion...
Elmer
It would be nice to have a stand alone product, but the alternative of the v4 is terrible. For me the hassle of using the switch outweighs the problems of the v4. I for one hope they get their act together soon. If they are having the same problem with the 18 and 19 then there is hope. I have not heard anything about the 18.













