C7 Tech/Performance Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Tuned

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2013, 10:54 PM
  #41  
B-Myster
Melting Slicks
 
B-Myster's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2000
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 2,125
Received 171 Likes on 58 Posts

Default

Nice gains with the tune. I'm assuming this was an automatic?
Old 10-01-2013, 11:00 PM
  #42  
VIN666
Pro
 
VIN666's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't have experience with DI tuning yet.
Neither with Diesels.
Is it possible that the spray pattern / atomization suffers to a degree where it could have an adverse effect?
Meaning, 19% isn't really 19% capacity if you catch my drift?
Old 10-01-2013, 11:08 PM
  #43  
Baron7700
Racer
 
Baron7700's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nice 21MC! Can I ask you a question, do you find the tunes are different based on the driving modes?

I posted a thread up earlier when me and my buddy pulled the tune off with hptuners last week and were looking at it. I did see the FI tables and was quite shocked.

Both him and me had FI/DI cars before this, so we are excited about throwing a tune on, any insight would be a help. He has tuned thousands of cars, but we just havent had the time to do a proper street tune followed up with a dyno test and logging.

In the turbo cobalt ss world (Direct injection stock turbo, in which the ats motor is an evolution of the LNF) injectors was never an issue, it was the high pressure fuel pump. Many guys were running 4-500whp on injectors that came stock for a 260 crank hp car.

Last edited by Baron7700; 10-01-2013 at 11:12 PM.
Old 10-01-2013, 11:14 PM
  #44  
C7lover2
Intermediate
 
C7lover2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baron7700
Nice 21MC! Can I ask you a question, do you find the tunes are different based on the driving modes?

I posted a thread up earlier when me and my buddy pulled the tune off with hptuners last week and were looking at it. I did see the FI tables and was quite shocked.

Both him and me had FI/DI cars before this, so we are excited about throwing a tune on, any insight would be a help. He has tuned thousands of cars, but we just havent had the time to do a proper street tune followed up with a dyno test and logging.

In the turbo cobalt ss world (Direct injection stock turbo, in which the ats motor is an evolution of the LNF) injectors was never an issue, it was the high pressure fuel pump. Many guys were running 4-500whp on injectors that came stock for a 260 crank hp car.
What did they do to resolve the fuel pump issue?
Old 10-01-2013, 11:16 PM
  #45  
Baron7700
Racer
 
Baron7700's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C7lover2
What did they do to resolve the fuel pump issue?
Nothing to successful per se, some companies came out with cams that had a slightly bigger fuel pump lobe on it to increase duration and try to get the pump to just pump longer / harder / more etc. A friend of mine just put them on and we went to the dyno, due to other reasons, he didnt make any more power. The cobalt SS' dont have that big of an aftermarket support unfortunately, which is a shame because the motor is just awesome, and makes crazy power, and torque.

I routinely made 310whp/360wtrq out of the stock tiny k04 twinscroll turbo and ran high 12's on street tires on just an intake, catless downpipe, and a tune (thats 100whp and 140wtrq over stock out of basically just a tune). Its gone now though...
Old 10-01-2013, 11:18 PM
  #46  
VIN666
Pro
 
VIN666's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I remember didn't you Cobalt guys have issues holding the transaxle together?
(Unlike the SRT crowd).
Old 10-01-2013, 11:28 PM
  #47  
Baron7700
Racer
 
Baron7700's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VIN666
From what I remember didn't you Cobalt guys have issues holding the transaxle together?
(Unlike the SRT crowd).
Not particularly. My trans and stock clutch held that just fine. I was conscious not to beat on it down low though. It was really hit or miss, some people would blow the trans bone stock, and some people had serious power with no issue. Really it was more of an abuse or fluke thing. Realize most of the owners of the car are younger, and now that the turbo ones are entering the used market and getting even cheaper, there just gunna get flogged more.

I wish I could have kept mine and do the vette, I feel like some day Ill look back and see one in still decent condition and wish I still had mine / maybe itll be worth something (not crazy money, but some value)
Old 10-01-2013, 11:46 PM
  #48  
VIN666
Pro
 
VIN666's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll never sell my neon. These type of cars are dying out.
And the T850 usually handles up to 750 whp / trq.
Not sure what the tubo 'balts can do, I was turned off by their blown predecessors...
Old 10-02-2013, 01:06 AM
  #49  
NoOne
Team Owner
 
NoOne's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 1999
Location: Auburn Hills MI
Posts: 34,551
Received 503 Likes on 247 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tail_lights
I seriously doubt a better tune to pick up a few ponies up top will hurt MPGs, shoot, I bet the 21st Century tune gets better that stock MPG


Edit:
I guess I should say I'm sure a company as big as GM could find a way to put a better tune to pick up a few ponies up top without hurting MPGs. They just didn't want to.... YET....
Then you do not understand it is not about MPG.

It is about emissions. It is about achieving and maintaining catalytic converter temperature. There are 20 other things they have to look at than MPG.

I know a lot of people say tuned cars drive like stock, they probably do 95 to 99 percent of the time but for an OEM it has to be 100 percent of the time.

I have my Regal GS tuned, 330hp from 270 stock, 65ft lbs over stock. It has a hair trigger gas pedal, its pretty jerky on the freeway because 22lbs of boost is about 1/8" of an inch away on the pedal.

It's much faster and I like it, but most would not and would complain. That is an extreme example but it rarely has much to do with MPG. Drive ability is a big thing. Especially on manual trans cars, they put a lot of work into on pedal/off pedal and slapping/slack in the drive train.
Old 10-02-2013, 09:39 AM
  #50  
Baron7700
Racer
 
Baron7700's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2013
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NoOne
Then you do not understand it is not about MPG.

It is about emissions. It is about achieving and maintaining catalytic converter temperature. There are 20 other things they have to look at than MPG.

I know a lot of people say tuned cars drive like stock, they probably do 95 to 99 percent of the time but for an OEM it has to be 100 percent of the time.

I have my Regal GS tuned, 330hp from 270 stock, 65ft lbs over stock. It has a hair trigger gas pedal, its pretty jerky on the freeway because 22lbs of boost is about 1/8" of an inch away on the pedal.

It's much faster and I like it, but most would not and would complain. That is an extreme example but it rarely has much to do with MPG. Drive ability is a big thing. Especially on manual trans cars, they put a lot of work into on pedal/off pedal and slapping/slack in the drive train.
Your tuner should be able to adjust the pedal sensitivity, some of my first tunes had a hair trigger pedal like that. If they do it enough, they will figure it out. If not, I can hook you up with the one who did all of mine, he is very familiar with the systems. I should try to get him on the forum, as Direct injection is tricky business.
Old 10-02-2013, 10:10 AM
  #51  
0HennesseyPerformance
Former Vendor
 
HennesseyPerformance's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Nice work as always John Page!
Old 10-02-2013, 10:11 AM
  #52  
travisnd
Safety Car
 
travisnd's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: Chesapeake VA
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by arghx7
DI engines are not like PFI. You can't really go by injector duty cycle. You have to look at the start of injection and end of injection timing as well as the rail pressure. On most engines, any SOI before 340BTDC firing and EOI after 50BTDC firing will have smoke and oil dilution. This is because the fuel hits the piston or cylinder wall.

Call it 19 percent if you want, but that's thinking in PFI terms really. On a PFI engine, you tune the injection timing first by the end of injection. It's either open valve or closed valve injection. Typically full load is open valve, and if you fully max the injectors out they keep spraying on the back of the valve all through the 4 strokes.



Again, they will max out if you care about fuel impingement, oil dilution, and throwing fuel out of the exhaust valve. Which, I admit, nobody here cares about that much.

But to say GM left a bunch of headroom is simply not getting into their mindset and not understanding how DI engines are designed. Injection timing, rail pressure, and number of injections are all important factors, and they can affect horsepower.
Interesting... thanks for the info. Direct injection is new to many of us.

Originally Posted by OBSSSD
But GM engineers said that the C7 PCM would be tuner-proof
GM never said that. A troll posing as a GM engineeer Big_Gunzz on LS1 tech did. He had a whole flock of people riding his ***** before being outed.
Old 10-02-2013, 01:15 PM
  #53  
Suns_PSD
Le Mans Master
 
Suns_PSD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,434
Received 408 Likes on 301 Posts
Default

OP, great results.

I love this platform as there are so many performance options.

Does your tune only operate in certain modes? Say the track mode only? Or does it work at all times?

Would you have the option of getting the full power program in track and maybe the best mpg program in 4 cylinder mode, or something like that?

On mpg & tunes, my previous car gained 50 rwhp with bolt ons and gained a solid 4-5 mpg. It was a pretty large improvement.
Old 10-02-2013, 02:31 PM
  #54  
arghx7
Intermediate
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by travisnd
GM never said that. A troll posing as a GM engineeer Big_Gunzz on LS1 tech did. He had a whole flock of people riding his ***** before being outed.
For most guys who develop and tune engines, there's a pretty big disconnect between what the aftermarket is doing and what they are doing. I said earlier the injectors can be "maxed out" from the perspective of impinging on the piston and cylinder wall. But we know that there are plenty of DI engines running around with much longer injection duration than stock in order to support a lot more horsepower. The owners of those cars probably wouldn't even know that their car is putting out way more smoke or diluting the oil more than necessary.

Considering most guys who mod their car take pride in changing the oil every 2500-3000 miles with expensive stuff, the mindset is going to be totally different from an engineer trying to tune the car specifically for max oil life. Also, the durability requirements are very different. When you run durability on an engine dyno, it's sitting there at a steady-state condition for what most would consider a very long period of time (it could be say anywhere from 5 minutes to an hour straight at WOT). In a car, you bang through the gears in a 1/4 mile and that's it. An engine dyno can't recreate that so easily, so something that shows up in a vehicle transient may be hard to catch during a tight development schedule. Look at the transient knock issue that the Subaru BRZ has had.

So when leaning out for power you might drop an exhaust valve in a manufacturer durability test but would never see that on the street unless you slap twin turbos on there or something. Or in the case of forced induction, the block may have been designed to withstand a low speed preignition event that you might never hit on the street, only an engine dyno. That's part of the reason why blocks designed for boost often hold up so much better than blocks not designed for it. The durability targets are set for a lab environment.

Last edited by arghx7; 10-02-2013 at 02:35 PM.
Old 10-02-2013, 02:49 PM
  #55  
punky
Banned Scam/Spammer
 
punky's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2005
Location: Bonita Springs FL
Posts: 8,084
Received 3,862 Likes on 1,912 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 21STCENTURYMUSCLECAR
Base line tune compared to 21CMC tune, both done same day, same dyno and same fuel.....

Stock>>>>>> 21CMC tune
RWHP 398.7>>> 430.3
RWTQ 391.7>>> 427.0

The tuned graph was even done in 6 degree higher heat

Tremendous gains over entire power band!



We will have mail order tunes available soon!

Best Regards,
John Page
Twenty First Century Muscle Cars
www.21stcenturymusclecars.com
Outstanding! Great work and in an incredibly brief period of time. You guys don't mess around do you.

+35tq on top of a very favorable stock LT1 tq curve will give this car a huge "fun to drive factor". Gorgeous graph.

The car has only been out for a little over a week and the aftermarket has bumped the power in significant fashion. I can't wait till someone fabs up a set LTs and gets the numbers on that setup. This is going to be fun for sure.
Old 10-02-2013, 03:10 PM
  #56  
JMB
Melting Slicks
 
JMB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 2,207
Received 452 Likes on 255 Posts

Default

Great work and my oh my, this was quick!

Could you post what the OEM A/F looks like vs your finished tune? Are these running rich from the Factory or Lean?
Old 10-02-2013, 04:30 PM
  #57  
tail_lights
Race Director
 
tail_lights's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: SE TEX
Posts: 10,581
Received 252 Likes on 210 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NoOne
Then you do not understand it is not about MPG.

It is about emissions. It is about achieving and maintaining catalytic converter temperature. There are 20 other things they have to look at than MPG.

I know a lot of people say tuned cars drive like stock, they probably do 95 to 99 percent of the time but for an OEM it has to be 100 percent of the time.

I have my Regal GS tuned, 330hp from 270 stock, 65ft lbs over stock. It has a hair trigger gas pedal, its pretty jerky on the freeway because 22lbs of boost is about 1/8" of an inch away on the pedal.

It's much faster and I like it, but most would not and would complain. That is an extreme example but it rarely has much to do with MPG. Drive ability is a big thing. Especially on manual trans cars, they put a lot of work into on pedal/off pedal and slapping/slack in the drive train.
Maybe.

I think your example of tuning is a bit exaggerated especially being boosted. I'm sure the tuned C7 does not drive like what you are describing.

All I am saying is that when the car manufacturer, who has control over EVERYTHING (cam size, head design, displacement, pistons, injection type, tuning, fuel type, weight, CD, etc etc etc) can't give us better numbers than what they did, and then in the first few days of this car being out an independent tuner picks up 30rwhp and rwtq something is being held back

Get notified of new replies

To Dyno Tuned

Old 10-02-2013, 04:46 PM
  #58  
MBB
Melting Slicks
 
MBB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas Tejas
Posts: 2,837
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tail_lights
Maybe I'm a "negative nancy", but GM should have just given us better numbers to begin with.

What this post implies is that they are holding back with their 460 horses like many of us thought.
They give you a nice safe tune from the factory. A tune that allows for a multitude of variables including fuel, temp, etc. It makes perfect sense.
Old 10-02-2013, 05:07 PM
  #59  
tail_lights
Race Director
 
tail_lights's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: SE TEX
Posts: 10,581
Received 252 Likes on 210 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MBB
They give you a nice safe tune from the factory. A tune that allows for a multitude of variables including fuel, temp, etc. It makes perfect sense.
So in a few years when they pick up MPG and HP are you gonna buy that they "changed the intake runner" or "went with a less restrictive exhaust"?
Old 10-02-2013, 05:24 PM
  #60  
MBB
Melting Slicks
 
MBB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas Tejas
Posts: 2,837
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tail_lights
So in a few years when they pick up MPG and HP are you gonna buy that they "changed the intake runner" or "went with a less restrictive exhaust"?
Why are you so butthurt here? Go troll somewhere else.


Quick Reply: Dyno Tuned



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.