When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Guys I just wanted to let you all know our goal is to dyno every product we add to our site. As a result I will be engine dyno testing every major brand of headers on the the engine dyno test LT1.
I'm waiting for all the top brands to arrive & they will all be available through our site!
I think this is a great idea but considering you guys manufacture headers I'd be a little skeptical about the results. I'd suggest someone who isn't a header manufacture do the "independent" testing but that is just my opinion. We offer all of those brands as well aside from your headers; we don't have a horse in the race so to speak. I think a test by someone like ECS, FSP, Redline, LMR or us for that matter would be more viable.
I think this is a great idea but considering you guys manufacture headers I'd be a little skeptical about the results. I'd suggest someone who isn't a header manufacture do the "independent" testing but that is just my opinion. We offer all of those brands as well aside from your headers; we don't have a horse in the race so to speak. I think a test by someone like ECS, FSP, Redline, LMR or us for that matter would be more viable.
Kind regards,
Jordan Priestley
888.308.6007
It looks like LG and Kooks were the only two companies smart enough to stay away from that trap. Good luck to the other guys, hopefully they aren't using your headers for R&D
No they are absolutely not afraid of the testing. When I talked to Aaron I told him we were going to test everything & he liked the idea.
The issue is he's back ordered
Its been an absolutely explosive month for our header line (both c7 and c6 for some reason?) - but we have welders working OT and weekends to help keep up with demand. Keep in touch
I think this is a great idea but considering you guys manufacture headers I'd be a little skeptical about the results. I'd suggest someone who isn't a header manufacture do the "independent" testing but that is just my opinion. We offer all of those brands as well aside from your headers; we don't have a horse in the race so to speak. I think a test by someone like ECS, FSP, Redline, LMR or us for that matter would be more viable.
We know you're swapping around headers, but can you describe the intake and [the rest of] the exhaust system you're using on the engine dyno? How do they compare to systems used on the vehicle in terms of pipe lengths, restriction, etc?
And are these steady state-tests, where you go point-by-point, or full throttle transients? Will you be sweeping the cam phaser at each rpm point? Changing the header design is going to affect the exhaust tuning and the optimum cam retard settings.
Well I'm on the fence. As a consumer, I would love to see this test! However, I can't really blame LG or Kooks for not wanting to be part of the test....I would never help a competitor give an "independent" test of my product, that's just common sense
Why not especially if one of the mottos is the most powerful headers in the world. I would get them out there. Remember it's not just peak ho people are looking for. Some may have better mid range then the others or low end vs someone that makes more peak etc etc
Well I'm on the fence. As a consumer, I would love to see this test! However, I can't really blame LG or Kooks for not wanting to be part of the test....I would never help a competitor give an "independent" test of my product, that's just common sense
That was my point and I am in no way knocking Texas Speed. I'm simply making an observation and if it were me in the shoes of those manufactures that would be my line of thought.
Originally Posted by Shurshot
Interesting comment
I'm not saying anything about their character or ethics but it isn't an "Independent test", period.
Originally Posted by JMB
Normally I would agree but Jason's shop has established itself as a premier shop and I know that I will fully trust the results.
They also manufacture headers and there are a number of premier shops in the country that don't manufacture headers that would probably be more suited to provide independent testing. That is my point and again it isn't an attack on them or their character...
Well I'm on the fence. As a consumer, I would love to see this test! However, I can't really blame LG or Kooks for not wanting to be part of the test....I would never help a competitor give an "independent" test of my product, that's just common sense
Exactly my point. LG, Kooks,Phadt,and ARH have great reputations with just about everyone here, and if they were the ones publishing the "independent" results, it just wouldn't be fair and couldn't be trusted. Why should TSP be treated any different? I appreciate their effort, but definitely question their ability to be unbiased
Exactly my point. LG, Kooks,Phadt,and ARH have great reputations with just about everyone here, and if they were the ones publishing the "independent" results, it just wouldn't be fair and couldn't be trusted. Why should TSP be treated any different? I appreciate their effort, but definitely question their ability to be unbiased
Guys take it easy here! Jason is a stand-up guy, and his shop is top-notch. It's my understanding that he just wants to keep his website updated with the most accurate and up-to-date info on C7 products....and they are doing it for you! I don't even think they have headers for a C7, or even have plans to launch any for that matter.
...It's my understanding that he just wants to keep his website updated with the most accurate and up-to-date info on C7 products....and they are doing it for you! I don't even think they have headers for a C7, or even have plans to launch any for that matter.
That is great, but you are missing the point. TSP is a header manufacturer and therefore should not be performing the test. Period. That's the end of it.
The fact that they don't have a C7 header yet, makes this whole thing even crazier. All that means is they can reap the benefits of all the R&D performed by Kooks, ARH, Phadt and LG in a single weekend. If they don't have one yet...I can guarantee they will have one a lot faster after this test
I just hope this thread doesn't get locked and we'll actually get some comparison results.
It's nothing short of amazing how threads tend to spiral out of control on here all the time.
It's like there is no moderation what so ever...
I will not be posting the results guys. I just try to test parts we sell for our customers, and people want to imply I'm a crook.
Of course I will test every header either way. Of course I'll make a header eventually, and of course I'll make it the best I absolutely can.
To imply other companies did extensive testing on their designs and somehow I just want to copy it is ridiculous. First off none of the header mfgs even have a engine dyno or lt1 test engine to do it.
I don't have a c7 header guys and won't for a good while.
I'll tell you why I can test these things. I'm one of about 2 or 3 shops that even have a engine dyno.
I don't have to post the results, I just thought you guys might like to know.
Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA
I will not be posting the results guys. I just try to test parts we sell for our customers, and people want to imply I'm a crook.
Of course I will test every header either way. Of course I'll make a header eventually, and of course I'll make it the best I absolutely can.
To imply other companies did extensive testing on their designs and somehow I just want to copy it is ridiculous. First off none of the header mfgs even have a engine dyno or lt1 test engine to do it.
Ill continue to test & test as always.
I never implied you were trying to steal something or that you were a crook but it is hard to have an unbiased opinion when you manufacture a competing product.
We test parts on cars and in real world conditions everyday; the only difference is we don't manufacture competing products. I wasn't trying to come off implying anything negative against you or your products. I have respect for you and your company.
Its a sad day when you try to offer up comparison results for everyone and get completely shot down by people who are clearly unfamiliar with how Texas Speed operates. We have been nothing but an honest and forthcoming shop when it comes to these kinds of results. It does us no good to lie about a competitors product, that only makes us look worse. At the end of the day, we obviously won't be the only people posting dyno results of headers on these cars.
I will not be posting the results guys. I just try to test parts we sell for our customers, and people want to imply I'm a crook.
Of course I will test every header either way. Of course I'll make a header eventually, and of course I'll make it the best I absolutely can.
To imply other companies did extensive testing on their designs and somehow I just want to copy it is ridiculous. First off none of the header mfgs even have a engine dyno or lt1 test engine to do it.
Ill continue to test & test as always.
Jason, there is a bunch of us that appreciate the time you take to post on gm forums; so please continue.
There will always be "these guys"