When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
NASCAR, the pinnacle of automotive racing technology.
NASCAR went to fuel injection only 25 years after the automotive industry....wait, I thought street cars improve through racing tech, not the other way around....
Do you have any actual technological documented proof that higher coolant temperatures create more horsepower? Higher oil temps can make more power up to a point by reducing viscosity but coolant temps are better off as cold as you can get them.
Do you even race a car? You don't need a thermostat to get to Starbucks, on this point you are correct.
Heck I don't even go to Starbucks anymore because I don't want to catch diabetes and I hear they serve it up hot in every cup.
Great another bag of hot air that knows more than the professionals, so why don't you just parade yourself right on down there with your big brain, and show Roush, Hendricks, Gibbs, Penske, and Childress how it's done!!.
Great another bag of hot air that knows more than the professionals, so why don't you just parade yourself right on down there with your big brain, and show Roush, Hendricks, Gibbs, Penske, and Childress how it's done!!.
you missed the point. nascar engine builders don't write the rule book.
you missed the point. nascar engine builders don't write the rule book.
neither do they install 160 t stats, totally do not understand the reasoning of how a t stat improves the effiency of the radiator and surrounding components. We all seem to have different ideas on the subject
neither do they install 160 t stats, totally do not understand the reasoning of how a t stat improves the effiency of the radiator and surrounding components. We all seem to have different ideas on the subject
do they run thermostats? I don't run a thermostat in my race cars. if you don't understand something it is probably best not to post in its regard. the immediate discussion was comparing nascar running temps to street cars, which I and others contend is a questionable endeavor.
Originally Posted by jimman
That statement makes no sense at all, where did you get rule book out of this conversation?
see above then take into account that nascar engine builders, chassis builders, etc are governed by a rule book. I brought the rule book into this conversation (where did I get a rule book out of this conversation, lol).
they don't choose the displacement or much of anything else and their operating temps are an effect, not a cause.
and yes I build my motors for my race cars since I missed your previous post. do you? don't make assumptions.....
this thread is about a lower temp thermostat being effective on a street car or race car that uses thermostats. the people who use them say they work. the people who don't use them can't see how they would work. people want to buy them and lots of companies sell them. I guess everyone is wrong then? you're right, the world is wrong.....I hope that's not your approach to life.
NASCAR, the pinnacle of automotive racing technology.
NASCAR went to fuel injection only 25 years after the automotive industry....wait, I thought street cars improve through racing tech, not the other way around....
Do you have any actual technological documented proof that higher coolant temperatures create more horsepower? Higher oil temps can make more power up to a point by reducing viscosity but coolant temps are better off as cold as you can get them.
Do you even race a car? You don't need a thermostat to get to Starbucks, on this point you are correct.
Heck I don't even go to Starbucks anymore because I don't want to catch diabetes and I hear they serve it up hot in every cup.
Do you actually proof read your text before you hit send? Nascar, well I’m impressed to take a 358cuin push rod motors and have 43 cars run 9400 rpm’s for over 4 hours without any issues, week after week. When you build a motor from scratch and boost that I’ll listen. As far as I race cars, probably before you were born.
I think nascar is boring but maybe that's why you like it, since you are so old, having raced cars before I was born (as if you know my age). I guess in the same line of thought, I'll be racing cars long after you are, uh, not.
I did. IF you drive a C7Z look for yourself. Full 6,500 rpm redline suggested OK from GM when ECT gets to 165 f, and oil temp to 75 f. As conservative as GM has tuned the Z, with all the engine protection nannies that kick in to ensure they don't have warranty claims for 100,000 miles, do you really think they would suggest full rpm usage at lower than allowable operating temps?
Also, two quartermile runs, back to back in my C6Z. First at 180 ECT, second at 200+. Second run 2 MPH slower. That's roughly 20 HP lost.
I think nascar is boring but maybe that's why you like it, since you are so old, having raced cars before I was born (as if you know my age). I guess in the same line of thought, I'll be racing cars long after you are, uh, not.
I would suggest you do a little research on who you insult. You seem to want to make it personal in most of your posts with most that challenge your opinion.
I did. IF you drive a C7Z look for yourself. Full 6,500 rpm redline suggested OK from GM when ECT gets to 165 f, and oil temp to 75 f. As conservative as GM has tuned the Z, with all the engine protection nannies that kick in to ensure they don't have warranty claims for 100,000 miles, do you really think they would suggest full rpm usage at lower than allowable operating temps?
Also, two quartermile runs, back to back in my C6Z. First at 180 ECT, second at 200+. Second run 2 MPH slower. That's roughly 20 HP lost.
First I would say way too many other variables are involved to come to that conclusion, one maybe you were getting tired:-)))
I would suggest you do a little research on who you insult. You seem to want to make it personal in most of your posts with most that challenge your opinion.
i dont mean to insult you, sorry you took it that way, but it works both ways. i just know what you have pm'd me in the past and thats all the research i need. maybe you can jet a carburator with the best of them, but you continually exhibit a lack of understanding with modern technologies. sorry, i am only basing it on your posts and pm's.....not whatever "researching you" will help me understand about "the greatness before me."
First I would say way too many other variables are involved to come to that conclusion, one maybe you were getting tired:-)))
The only thing I'm tired of is your continued stupidity. You've been spouting the same, wrong point of view since 2000, when we were both driving C5's.
If you knew anything about drag racing you'd know that MPH, and changes in MPH is more indicative of changes in horsepower, not driver skills. Now if I had said changes in ET your insulting response would have made more sense.
Two runs, back to back, changing only the ECT at the start of the runs eliminates as many variables as possible. But you know that, you're just too obtuse to acknowledge it.
The only thing I'm tired of is your continued stupidity. You've been spouting the same, wrong point of view since 2000, when we were both driving C5's.
If you knew anything about drag racing you'd know that MPH, and changes in MPH is more indicative of changes in horsepower, not driver skills. Now if I had said changes in ET your insulting response would have made more sense.
Two runs, back to back, changing only the ECT at the start of the runs eliminates as many variables as possible. But you know that, you're just too obtuse to acknowledge it.
I think nascar is boring but maybe that's why you like it, since you are so old, having raced cars before I was born (as if you know my age). I guess in the same line of thought, I'll be racing cars long after you are, uh, not.
good one. guess I'll spend the rest of the day reflecting.
that means a lot coming from someone across the country on the internet who has never met me basing his opinion on an extremely short conversation revealing his presumptuous mentality.
so far you have called me a bag of hot air and an arrogant azz but you have not contributed any actual factual provable information to the thread. go back and look who has. got any more zingers?
good one. guess I'll spend the rest of the day reflecting.
that means a lot coming from someone across the country on the internet who has never met me basing his opinion on an extremely short conversation revealing his presumptuous mentality.
so far you have called me a bag of hot air and an arrogant azz but you have not contributed any actual factual provable information to the thread. go back and look who has. got any more zingers?
His conclusion probably based on the fact you get personal and call anyone who disagrees with you stupid and shouldn’t be posting responses. Since your bio is blank for all we know is you may be the head cashier at Albertsons with a lot of time on his hands cutting and pasting information.
His conclusion probably based on the fact you get personal and call anyone who disagrees with you stupid and shouldn’t be posting responses. Since your bio is blank for all we know is you may be the head cashier at Albertsons with a lot of time on his hands cutting and pasting information.
if my info seems cut and pasted then I take it as a compliment.
my bio isn't blank, my job is not your business, but I do take it as another compliment that you think I could be HEAD cashier!
and as far as getting personal, I've been the one getting called names, not the other way around.
but the way, you might note the interesting fact that no one agrees with you.....get a clue.
good one. guess I'll spend the rest of the day reflecting.
that means a lot coming from someone across the country on the internet who has never met me basing his opinion on an extremely short conversation revealing his presumptuous mentality.
so far you have called me a bag of hot air and an arrogant azz but you have not contributed any actual factual provable information to the thread. go back and look who has. got any more zingers?
You are the one to talk bashing dude. You come in here trouncing everyone who may disagree with you or may have a different opinion, one way or the other with your degrading crap. I had monitored you post for some time, and finally spoke up. You slam Jiman, but what your pompas butt cannot fathom, is the fact it was guys his generation that founded the car culture we now enjoy. Back in his day it was seat of the pants innovation and creativity that led to NHRA and NASCAR which you so proudly demean. Again if u don't agree you degrade. So go back to popping your zits when you are not impressing others with your big brain and higher than thou attitude. God i truly feel sorry for those in your world.