When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Way back I commented about the ZR-1 & about how I wished it were offered with an auto got accused of heresy & even suggested I turn in my membership here. Now I read about everyone crowing about the Z06 being offered with one & why the new Vipers sales are so soft because an auto isn't offered. I now feel vindicated & consider my self some what of a visionary.
From: Greater Detroit Metro MI, when I'm not travelling.
Originally Posted by turbolou
Way back I commented about the ZR-1 & about how I wished it were offered with an auto got accused of heresy & even suggested I turn in my membership here. Now I read about everyone crowing about the Z06 being offered with one & why the new Vipers sales are so soft because an auto isn't offered. I now feel vindicated & consider my self some what of a visionary.
Nah, plenty of people like myself still think an old school torque converter automatic has no place in a sports car. But I have gone to enough "Corvettes at Carlisle", "Bowling Green Cruize-Ins" and "Corvetter Cruises" to understand that, sports-car heritage aside, the vast majority of buyers are older men looking for something to wax, keep miles off, drive gingerly and show off on the weekends, and to that demographic a soft automatic makes a lot of sense. In the end as long as it helps GM sell a lot of them it benefits me because I'll be able to get what I want for cheap.
Way back I commented about the ZR-1 & about how I wished it were offered with an auto got accused of heresy & even suggested I turn in my membership here. Now I read about everyone crowing about the Z06 being offered with one & why the new Vipers sales are so soft because an auto isn't offered. I now feel vindicated & consider my self some what of a visionary.
You are right-on Turbolou. I said in 2005 if they developed a fast paddle shift type auto for the ZO6 then I was IN. Well, it's been a long 10 year wait, but next year that statement will be fulfilled.
This is not your Daddy's auto by far with very fast shift speeds right there with the likes of the Porsche PDK transmission and according to The General they have done just that!
The old school manual stick shift is so yesterday 20th century, I see that the new A8 offered by Corvette in their flagship high performance car as the future and 21st century.
a lot of people that have never driven a fast auto car that is setup right don't know what they are missing. If you have driven a 12' or newer CTS-V/ ZL1 auto, you would see the differences GM has made in their autos. They did a big revision in the trans tune that cut down on shift times and made it very responsive. no reason to waste time shifting gears
You are right-on Turbolou. I said in 2005 if they developed a fast paddle shift type auto for the ZO6 then I was IN. Well, it's been a long 10 year wait, but next year that statement will be fulfilled.
This is not your Daddy's auto by far with very fast shift speeds right there with the likes of the Porsche PDK transmission and according to The General they have done just that!
The old school manual stick shift is so yesterday 20th century, I see that the new A8 offered by Corvette in their flagship high performance car as the future and 21st century.
If GM can even achieve 80% of the performance of the "Sport" PDK in the GT3 and Turbo it will be a huge success. Those boxes are far and away better than any other DCT I've driven.
Here is an interesting tidbit...BMW is building the M231i Racing club racer with an 8-speed torque convertor paddle-shifted auto in it rather than a DCT. Interesting times...
S.
Nah, plenty of people like myself still think an old school torque converter automatic has no place in a sports car. But I have gone to enough "Corvettes at Carlisle", "Bowling Green Cruize-Ins" and "Corvetter Cruises" to understand that, sports-car heritage aside, the vast majority of buyers are older men looking for something to wax, keep miles off, drive gingerly and show off on the weekends, and to that demographic a soft automatic makes a lot of sense. In the end as long as it helps GM sell a lot of them it benefits me because I'll be able to get what I want for cheap.
Nah, plenty of people like myself still think an old school torque converter automatic has no place in a sports car. But I have gone to enough "Corvettes at Carlisle", "Bowling Green Cruize-Ins" and "Corvetter Cruises" to understand that, sports-car heritage aside, the vast majority of buyers are older men looking for something to wax, keep miles off, drive gingerly and show off on the weekends, and to that demographic a soft automatic makes a lot of sense. In the end as long as it helps GM sell a lot of them it benefits me because I'll be able to get what I want for cheap.
What about drag racers, automatics are faster and more consistent at the track.
Right now I have a 600rwhp Shelby GT500 with a manual tranny, I love to drive the manual tranny, but if it were offered I would buy an automatic for the track and light to light prowess.
As long as it had paddle shifters so I could play around on the street for regular cruising I would be happy.
This argument will go on for a long time. There are some that will buy the auto and hone it in for racing performance and squeezing every second they can at the track. There are some that just can't drive a stick well enough to get much out of it. And there are those, probably in the majority who are just too lazy to shift.
Here is a quote from a couple years ago from Ranger, who few people here doubt his knowledge and ability to drive, and who sums it up nicely.
" For many owners, the C6Z06 is their first experience behind the wheel of a manual-tranny super car. Seat time needs to accumulate before driver reactions are honed. Even then, on the drag strip, turning AH down or off gives all risk and no reward.
Finally, I note with interest your car has an automatic tranny. Easier to drive, spared of the need to work the clutch and shifter and manage shift-points. That makes for less congestion in the driver's central processor, freeing up cycles to enjoy the view and play with the radio. "
This argument will go on for a long time. There are some that will buy the auto and hone it in for racing performance and squeezing every second they can at the track. There are some that just can't drive a stick well enough to get much out of it. And there are those, probably in the majority who are just too lazy to shift.
Here is a quote from a couple years ago from Ranger, who few people here doubt his knowledge and ability to drive, and who sums it up nicely.
" For many owners, the C6Z06 is their first experience behind the wheel of a manual-tranny super car. Seat time needs to accumulate before driver reactions are honed. Even then, on the drag strip, turning AH down or off gives all risk and no reward.
Finally, I note with interest your car has an automatic tranny. Easier to drive, spared of the need to work the clutch and shifter and manage shift-points. That makes for less congestion in the driver's central processor, freeing up cycles to enjoy the view and play with the radio. "
Ranger
I keep hearing about this Ranger legend & his driving ability's I wonder how his clutch, transmission & valve spring budget goes. The Zo6 & Zr-1 both have a history of trans problems just driving them normal. From a mechanical stand point an auto is easier on the drive train & on something called a warranty. No one not even he can out shift an auto that would be important to someone like myself who is an old drag racer.Living here in Calif. how much fun is a clutch & in my case being 6'6" with long legs getting stuck in traffic . So from a practical point of view unless your brain is stuck back somewhere in time when there weren't any good automatics it doesn't make much sense to have to deal with a clutch.
I keep hearing about this Ranger legend & his driving ability's I wonder how his clutch, transmission & valve spring budget goes. The Zo6 & Zr-1 both have a history of trans problems just driving them normal. From a mechanical stand point an auto is easier on the drive train & on something called a warranty. No one not even he can out shift an auto that would be important to someone like myself who is an old drag racer.Living here in Calif. how much fun is a clutch & in my case being 6'6" with long legs getting stuck in traffic . So from a practical point of view unless your brain is stuck back somewhere in time when there weren't any good automatics it doesn't make much sense to have to deal with a clutch.
Times have changed from the golden" years of drag racing. Back in the 50's & 60's when there were "stock" classes, there were different classes for the automatics from the manuals. The "good" racers(ones that held the national records)were slower in their automatics than their counterpoints with their manuals. The manuals held the advantage.
Believe me when I say a "good" driver could shift his 4 speed Muncie, with a Hurst shifter, faster than an automatic. Popularity of the automatic in drag racing came about when they introduced "bracket" racing where consistency is the key, not quickness.
I don't believe there is anyway I could shift my C6 Z06's manual transmission anywhere as fast I could shift my Muncie's back in the 60's, thus my quickest 1/4 times today would be driving an automatic.
There have been many improvements in factory stock automatic transmissions, but I don't believe todays manual transmissions can be shifted as fast as the manual transmissions of 50 years ago.
Yes I think this ongoing debate is interesting and while I have always opted for the Manual and never considered an auto, the jury would be out for the first time with me on this new Z06. If I ordered today sight unseen, I would of course order the stick because I love shifting, but I would strongly consider the auto if it indeed performs as well as expectations and is still fun to drive. For me, that would take driving one of the new tranny's first.
Other than that I have no problem with the choice being offered or anyone's choice to go one way or the other. It's all good.
Times have changed from the golden" years of drag racing. Back in the 50's & 60's when there were "stock" classes, there were different classes for the automatics from the manuals. The "good" racers(ones that held the national records)were slower in their automatics than their counterpoints with their manuals. The manuals held the advantage.
Believe me when I say a "good" driver could shift his 4 speed Muncie, with a Hurst shifter, faster than an automatic. Popularity of the automatic in drag racing came about when they introduced "bracket" racing where consistency is the key, not quickness.
I don't believe there is anyway I could shift my C6 Z06's manual transmission anywhere as fast I could shift my Muncie's back in the 60's, thus my quickest 1/4 times today would be driving an automatic.
There have been many improvements in factory stock automatic transmissions, but I don't believe todays manual transmissions can be shifted as fast as the manual transmissions of 50 years ago.
I'm from that era & everything you say is correct. For example my other car is a Turbo Porsche with tiptronic the 0-60 times certified by the factory are quicker than with the clutch cars and believe the story will be the same with the C-7.
I keep hearing about this Ranger legend & his driving ability's I wonder how his clutch, transmission & valve spring budget goes. The Zo6 & Zr-1 both have a history of trans problems just driving them normal. From a mechanical stand point an auto is easier on the drive train & on something called a warranty. No one not even he can out shift an auto that would be important to someone like myself who is an old drag racer.Living here in Calif. how much fun is a clutch & in my case being 6'6" with long legs getting stuck in traffic . So from a practical point of view unless your brain is stuck back somewhere in time when there weren't any good automatics it doesn't make much sense to have to deal with a clutch.
I totally agree. I too am an old retired drag racer who was very well know for my seamless abilities with the manual 4-speed on the strip. I would have never given an automatic a second thought back then, but along came the Lenco "Automatic" transmission and OMG! I thought I died and went to heaven. No more clutch issues and high maintenance I may add and no more broken gear boxes, even though they were built specifically to take it. It was expensive to purchase at the time, but well worth every penny.
Oh! BTW, the C7.R...... Are those paddle shifters I see those drivers using in the video's?
Last edited by tmcternan; Apr 23, 2014 at 02:16 PM.
If GM can even achieve 80% of the performance of the "Sport" PDK in the GT3 and Turbo it will be a huge success. Those boxes are far and away better than any other DCT I've driven.
Here is an interesting tidbit...BMW is building the M231i Racing club racer with an 8-speed torque convertor paddle-shifted auto in it rather than a DCT. Interesting times...
S.
I saw that in Grassroots. About $75k but as of now it will not be sold in the US.
I saw that in Grassroots. About $75k but as of now it will not be sold in the US.
Pretty cool though, right?
They haven't said they won't be sold in the US, but that BMW has no "firm plans" and if there is a demand they may.
Neat stuff...Porsche does the same thing with the Cayman, but my point with this was that BMW is using an 8-speed torque convertor auto.
Based on my experience with my C7 A6 on track, GM will have to work very hard to control temps to allow the Z06 to run anything more than 10-15 minutes of hard lapping.
S.
Times have changed from the golden" years of drag racing. Back in the 50's & 60's when there were "stock" classes, there were different classes for the automatics from the manuals. The "good" racers(ones that held the national records)were slower in their automatics than their counterpoints with their manuals. The manuals held the advantage.
Believe me when I say a "good" driver could shift his 4 speed Muncie, with a Hurst shifter, faster than an automatic. Popularity of the automatic in drag racing came about when they introduced "bracket" racing where consistency is the key, not quickness.
I don't believe there is anyway I could shift my C6 Z06's manual transmission anywhere as fast I could shift my Muncie's back in the 60's, thus my quickest 1/4 times today would be driving an automatic.
There have been many improvements in factory stock automatic transmissions, but I don't believe todays manual transmissions can be shifted as fast as the manual transmissions of 50 years ago.
Like you said, times have changed, but I used to shift, well perhaps not the Muncie's cause they wouldn't hold up under any real serious horsepower and torgue, back in the days of the full on "Crash Boxes." and later with the "Doug Nash" gear sets, but that aside, these new automatics that are being made available are pretty incredible. And your right about the Manual and automatic classes being very different back in the day as far as elapse times, but since they've come out with the much higher stall torque converters 5,500 + and trans breaks, which allow the automatics to leave as if to side step the clutch or 3rd pedal as I've heard here, the automatic now have advantages over the manual transmissions nowadays. You don't see any manual transmissions being used in any of the really quick classes anymore, other than Pro/Stock and they're using the "Liberty" transmission because there's less parasitic loss, but those are still clutchless, other than for leaving the starting line.