Windshield Tint Percentage
#41
Lets put it this way, my 2024 3LT Stingray is probably among the very cheapest cars they've done, and they've been around for many years. I've been there twice. Each time they had a different Porsche GT3RS ( one of which is tracked so gets the full PPF 3-times a year). Saw a Porsche Turbo, and a stunning 2024 Rapid Blue Z06 too. They were recommended by my Corvette Saleman as the very best. He also said Ferrarri's are driven from the dock straight
to this place; and from seeing all the pics on the wall, they sure have a high end clientele.
I'm having this done because the car will be outside in the tropical downpours and scorching hot sun of South Florida, and will be my daily drive. The German Shepherd to the far left gets the 1992 300zx to shed, slobber and puke to his heart's content...
Last edited by GSD4me; 03-10-2024 at 12:19 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by GSD4me:
CorvetteBrent (03-11-2024),
Mitchell_B (03-10-2024)
#42
Drifting
I did 5% on the ASI brow (almost opaque)and 35% on the side windows. I like the look personally but to each their own. I’m actually illegal in Ohio as the sides are only allowed to be 50% but 35% really doesn’t even look real dark. The brow to me is nice since the visors are so small but I wouldn’t darken the entire windshield.
#43
Burning Brakes
Actually, a 70% VLT windshield with 70% film would be progressively darker than 70%. FMVSS state no glazer may supply for use in the US, front or side glass with lower VLT than 70%. Some states allow for the sides to then go a little darker. And the top band above the AS1 line can be darker, but not below.
Last edited by CorvetteBrent; 03-11-2024 at 09:12 AM.
The following users liked this post:
GSD4me (03-11-2024)
#44
Burning Brakes
Tickets for illegal tint
Never been pulled over, and been tinting my vehicles the same way for over 15 years. Even my work suv, chevy blazer is tinted 5% sides and rear, 35% front. Its overblown that cops pull people over for illegal tint, and this is coming from someone who does roadtrips 3-4x a year.
#45
Burning Brakes
I did 5% on the ASI brow (almost opaque)and 35% on the side windows. I like the look personally but to each their own. I’m actually illegal in Ohio as the sides are only allowed to be 50% but 35% really doesn’t even look real dark. The brow to me is nice since the visors are so small but I wouldn’t darken the entire windshield.
The following users liked this post:
GSD4me (03-11-2024)
#46
Drifting
1, it's a law. 2, the police should enforce laws. 3, I'm sure there was a reason the police officer wrote those 7 tickets. More than just that they were tinted.
I'm not saying don't tint your windows. I'm saying you accept the risk of a ticket or worse if you do.
I'm not saying don't tint your windows. I'm saying you accept the risk of a ticket or worse if you do.
#47
True, but the restrictions are absurd. Here in Southwest Florida, cars without super dark tint get unbearably hot, far worse than with tint. Nearly everybody here has illegal tint. The super dark 5% tint is quite popular here, but 10% and 15% are common, too. I don't know the percentage of my tint, but it's rather dark. The previous California owner had the tint installed, including on the windshield, but he remoed the windshield tint before selling the car to me.Cops occasionally write tickets for it, but enforcement seems to be random or arbitrary. Ultimately, tickets for tint are a revenue generator and little more. What does surprise me, though, is the number of darkly tinted windshields. I don't see how those people can drive at night. One final note: Virtually every tint shop here is ready and willing to install illegally dark tint.
Once you've used a quality ceramic tint with 80%+ VLT, you'll quickly realize that everything you've known about tint is a lie. I had residential ceramic tint put on my old house windows. Can't go dark VLT because it ruins curb appeal. But the effect with IR and UV is unmistakable. No need to go dark.
#48
Burning Brakes
I can only speak for the car enthusiasts of Southwest Florida. Here, one factor among many for tinted windows is rebellion bred of citizen anger. People are sick and tired of very unpopular tint laws being arbitrarily enforced, when virtually nobody wants the law and, worse, when fentanyl and numerous illegal drugs are everywhere and are killing both the youth and the elderly here and in every other region of our nation. Stop wasting police resources on illegal tint laws and loud exhaust laws and actually try to make a biiger dent in the overwhelming prevalence of illegal drug sales. In 2021, 2022, an 2023, there were more than 100,000 fatal overdoses per year in our nation, plus about 20 times as many non-fatal overdoses. Yet, law enforcement and their city council/county board overlords focus on the easy money of illegal tint and illegal exhaust tickets instead of focusing more on the deadly epidemic of illegal drugs. How many people were actually killed last year by dark tint or illegal exhaust? The whole situation is shameful and tragic.
#49
Burning Brakes
No. The police officer specifically told the kid that he was writing a specific ticket for EACH tinted window. Worse, the kid was parked at the convenience store, which is a private lot. The cop did NOT see the kid pull into the lot, but instead arrived a little later. "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." --- Edmund Burke (British philosopher and statesman)
#51
Drifting
I'm sure there would be more to the story if you asked the police officer. That it was a convenience store does not matter. You obviously have an issue with the police. Still, you know the law and you take the risk of a ticket/ fine/ arrest when you decide to break it. Again, I am not saying right or wrong, just that we all make a decision, and those decisions sometimes have risks.
No. The police officer specifically told the kid that he was writing a specific ticket for EACH tinted window. Worse, the kid was parked at the convenience store, which is a private lot. The cop did NOT see the kid pull into the lot, but instead arrived a little later. "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." --- Edmund Burke (British philosopher and statesman)
#52
Team Owner
Member Since: May 2001
Location: ...tearing up the highways, one state at a time™®©
Posts: 31,769
Received 2,111 Likes
on
1,079 Posts
#53
Team Owner
Member Since: May 2001
Location: ...tearing up the highways, one state at a time™®©
Posts: 31,769
Received 2,111 Likes
on
1,079 Posts
#54
Team Owner
Member Since: May 2001
Location: ...tearing up the highways, one state at a time™®©
Posts: 31,769
Received 2,111 Likes
on
1,079 Posts
Apparently not legal in Arizona:
#55
#57
I am actually for laws banning low VLT tint. Seen too much dash-cam & body cam footage of how almost impossible it is to safely engage with someone pulled over--at night--with low VLT windows. And you cannot "trust" that occupants will be courteous enough to just put all their windows down during a traffic stop--preemptively.
And since you can get IR and UV rejection up over 90% each with 70% ceramic tint--there is zero legitimate reason to have or allow low VLT tint up front. I have lived all over the place; hot climates, cold climates, dry climates, muggy climates. I still say there's no justification for low VLT tint--definitely not up front.
And since you can get IR and UV rejection up over 90% each with 70% ceramic tint--there is zero legitimate reason to have or allow low VLT tint up front. I have lived all over the place; hot climates, cold climates, dry climates, muggy climates. I still say there's no justification for low VLT tint--definitely not up front.