When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Same spring goes in LS/LT cars and trucks from 2014-2021 models. Just a bad batch, it's happened before and it will happen again. Kinda like the flu, once we all get over one, there will be another that comes along.
Too bad GM can't bill the spring manufacturer for warranty reimbursement costs to the dealer for repair. I'm betting some OEM's do just that on faulty parts.
Too bad GM can't bill the spring manufacturer for warranty reimbursement costs to the dealer for repair. I'm betting some OEM's do just that on faulty parts.
Wouldn't the Spring manufacturer have insurance for such contingencies?
C8 Corvette Valve Springs Problem Acknowledged By GM, Other V8 Models Affected
24 Sep 2020, 19:31 UTC ·
by Mircea Panait Home > News > Recalls
As with every first year of production, the 2020 Corvette isn’t perfect. Quality control is questionable at best, the mid-engine sports car had to be recalled over the “flying frunk” issue, and a technical service bulletin issued by General Motors only recently reveals that many LT2 engines need replacement valve springs.
Hopefully GM has a solid contract with the supplier for the springs where the supplier not only has to cover the cost of parts, but also the labor costs for the recall.
C8 Corvette Valve Springs Problem Acknowledged By GM, Other V8 Models Affected
24 Sep 2020, 19:31 UTC ·
by Mircea Panait Home > News > Recalls
As with every first year of production, the 2020 Corvette isn’t perfect. Quality control is questionable at best, the mid-engine sports car had to be recalled over the “flying frunk” issue, and a technical service bulletin issued by General Motors only recently reveals that many LT2 engines need replacement valve springs.
What a stupid article that is written by someone that knows nothing about how cars work. This statement is an example from the article "If you know someone who has recently taken delivery of a small-block V8 car, truck, or utility vehicle, you may want to tell him or her to ring the dealership as soon as possible and schedule an inspection as a precaution." Yeah, the vehicle runs perfect and the dealer is going to inspect it because..............what, so they can say "yup, she's got valve springs. Oh wait, let me get out my crystal ball and X-ray glasses to tell you if one might fail a week from now." It's a bad batch that went everywhere in a ton of engines, when they fail they will rear their ugly head. If they don't fail they don't have a problem.
You're probably right, but the same dynamics would apply to the manufacture of the drawn wire, and the process of winding and cooling for case hardening could go haywire as well if the equipment is not functioning to spec.
The drawn wire is heated before winding, and then must be cooled at a predetermined rate for proper hardening.
There are a number of deficiencies that could cause low strength of springs...all of them solved over 100 years ago.
So these early spring failures are indicative of a highly incompetent supplier.
This could be a multi-tier problem. There could of been a bad batch of steel going to the wire MFR...or... the wire MFR could have problems how the wire was drawn, leaving potential fracture imperfections in the drawn wire. The spring MFR. could have slipped up in the spring tempering process. I'm not saying these were the cause, simply stating there could be a multitude of reason's for the failure. Just saying...
I remember when GM got a bad batch of C6 Z06 rocker arms that liked to spit needle bearings throughout the engines. It was one bad batch, from January 2007 through July 2007.
There are a number of deficiencies that could cause low strength of springs...all of them solved over 100 years ago.
So these early spring failures are indicative of a highly incompetent supplier.
It does not seem like weak springs, as that would cause valve float. It would appear to be brittle springs, or maybe surface imprecations that allow cracks.
This could be a multi-tier problem. There could of been a bad batch of steel going to the wire MFR...or... the wire MFR could have problems how the wire was drawn, leaving potential fracture imperfections in the drawn wire. The spring MFR. could have slipped up in the spring tempering process. I'm not saying these were the cause, simply stating there could be a multitude of reason's for the failure. Just saying...
I remember when GM got a bad batch of C6 Z06 rocker arms that liked to spit needle bearings throughout the engines. It was one bad batch, from January 2007 through July 2007.
A Spring mfr makes many types of springs, not just for one vehicle. That means they are making, tempering, and drawing steel for each specification. They wouldn't be ordering wire from anyone. They would do all that in-house. They weren't performing proper sampling and testing during QC.
This could be a multi-tier problem. There could of been a bad batch of steel going to the wire MFR...or... the wire MFR could have problems how the wire was drawn, leaving potential fracture imperfections in the drawn wire. The spring MFR. could have slipped up in the spring tempering process. I'm not saying these were the cause, simply stating there could be a multitude of reason's for the failure. Just saying...
I remember when GM got a bad batch of C6 Z06 rocker arms that liked to spit needle bearings throughout the engines. It was one bad batch, from January 2007 through July 2007.
Yes agree, and the same theory I made back in post 28. Although this could be an inferior material issue, it is much more likely a hardening process issue. To make springs, a two step hardening process is typical. First hardened to a very brittle state, then quenched, reheated and tempered. Within this process, there are a number of steps where it can go out of spec. If they're out of spec on the brittle side and some in the batch are at that threshold, they have a tendency to crack which is what the failed ones are showing. Could be something as simple as an oven tstat was failing and reporting the incorrect temp. That could make the tempering step too hot.
Last edited by Alea_Iacta_Est; Sep 25, 2020 at 09:30 AM.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit if GM is using the same valve spring on those 7 different motors to save cash. I know GM uses the same lifter and has for years on many different motors that are radically different for each other. One part designed to work OK in many different applications vs. one part specifically engineered to work perfectly in one application.
All the Gen V engines use the same head and valvetrain design. The engines are very similar with slight differences to camshaft timing, intake, exhaust and accessories to package in different vehicles and to get truck vs. performance car power characteristics. The valve spring requirements overlap, it would be silly to have a bespoke part number and drive unneeded cost. Every engineering company tries to re-use as many existing components as possible. That's just sound engineering. if anything the truck engines are getting a better valve spring designed for the performance car envelope.
Everything we know about this issue at this time points to a manufacturing or processing defect in a specific lot batch of springs, not a design issue, so even bringing up that this spring is used in multiple applications and suggesting that makes it worse, makes no sense.
All the Gen V engines use the same head and valvetrain design. The engines are very similar with slight differences to camshaft timing, intake, exhaust and accessories to package in different vehicles and to get truck vs. performance car power characteristics. The valve spring requirements overlap, it would be silly to have a bespoke part number and drive unneeded cost. Every engineering company tries to re-use as many existing components as possible. That's just sound engineering. if anything the truck engines are getting a better valve spring designed for the performance car envelope.
Everything we know about this issue at this time points to a manufacturing or processing defect in a specific lot batch of springs, not a design issue, so even bringing up that this spring is used in multiple applications and suggesting that makes it worse, makes no sense.
But..... dual spring would stop catastrophic failure so there's that..
All the Gen V engines use the same head and valvetrain design. The engines are very similar with slight differences to camshaft timing, intake, exhaust and accessories to package in different vehicles and to get truck vs. performance car power characteristics. The valve spring requirements overlap, it would be silly to have a bespoke part number and drive unneeded cost. Every engineering company tries to re-use as many existing components as possible. That's just sound engineering. if anything the truck engines are getting a better valve spring designed for the performance car envelope.
Everything we know about this issue at this time points to a manufacturing or processing defect in a specific lot batch of springs, not a design issue, so even bringing up that this spring is used in multiple applications and suggesting that makes it worse, makes no sense.
Agree completely with your points.
VAG (VW/Audi group) is only one example, VAG uses VW parts in its entire lineup. You can find the same part such as a HL switch in VWs, Audis, Bentleys, Porsches, even Lamborghinis. It truly is just smart engineering. Now, how VAG distributes those parts is another issue. The same HL switch with a VW P/N will not be the same price for the exact same part with a Bentley P/N.
Agree completely with your points.
VAG (VW/Audi group) is only one example, VAG uses VW parts in its entire lineup. You can find the same part such as a HL switch in VWs, Audis, Bentleys, Porsches, even Lamborghinis. It truly is just smart engineering. Now, how VAG distributes those parts is another issue. The same HL switch with a VW P/N will not be the same price for the exact same part with a Bentley P/N.
There could be several reasons for different prices on the same part. First they be pricing parts on what the market will bear. Bentley buyers may be willing to pay more for the part so they price it higher, that is the free market. Other reasons could be how they do their accounting and cost distribution. The overhead cost of ordering, shipping and maintaining, a separate part may be same for Lambo as VW on a dollar basis, but VW is doing this on 1 million parts and Lambo is doing it for 5000 parts, the overhead cost per part is much higher for Lambo. They pass that cost along.
Oh I don't know, maybe batch test to failure would be a good SOP for critical parts? Hmm says Yoda.
Reminded of an excellent book my Mary Natrella; Experimental Statistics. It's a government pub ~400 pages. Has military examples.
One I like is an Admiral in WWII who's in charge of shelling the beaches in Normandy and asked her to be sure there are no shells that fall short causing "friendly causalities."
Mary asked how many shells he plans to fire. He says 1 million. She notes their normal statistical sample is based on testing one shell in 5000 for length (or some such number) and they fall in a bell shaped distribution curve to there is still a chance that out of a million, 100 will probably fall short of the minimum distance he specified. She goes on to tell him if she increases the sampling to X the number reduces to Y. He insists he wants none to fall less than what he specifies.
She then says IF we test every shell in a huge batch BUT one, there is still a chance (albeit very small) that last one will fall shorter than you request!
So what percent of valve springs are acceptable to have fail?
SIDEBAR:
Interesting text. I still have my hard bound copy, which Amazon says is available at ~$900! Paper back $33. It has 23 Charters covering from basic Probability and Statistics, Factorial Experiments (which I used extensively) to Expression of the Uncertainties of Final Results!
All the Gen V engines use the same head and valvetrain design. The engines are very similar with slight differences to camshaft timing, intake, exhaust and accessories to package in different vehicles and to get truck vs. performance car power characteristics. The valve spring requirements overlap, it would be silly to have a bespoke part number and drive unneeded cost. Every engineering company tries to re-use as many existing components as possible. That's just sound engineering. if anything the truck engines are getting a better valve spring designed for the performance car envelope.
Everything we know about this issue at this time points to a manufacturing or processing defect in a specific lot batch of springs, not a design issue, so even bringing up that this spring is used in multiple applications and suggesting that makes it worse, makes no sense.
I had first thought the Corvette had an exclusive motor, then I saw it was shared with the Camaro. Now it is found that the same basic block is used in grocery getters and work trucks. The more you know . . .
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.