When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Bhvrdr
Do you have any numbers from your car that you wish to share with us for comparison? That would help. Thanks
How would that help accurately comparing his baseline run versus his halltech run. We're trying to accurately compare data on his car not add someone else's in. That's confounding the data.
If we wanted to be helpful id ask him to do datalogging during the runs and during testing. I always datalog any mod.
Datalog air intake volume per rpm in the same gear versus intake air temperature, ECT, and the ambient temperature sensor.
This along with trap speed data and 60-130 data will help you know if your mods made power.
Once you know your mods made power THEN start looking for a better e.t. with e t. you may find other things you then want to address like launch traction
How would that help accurately comparing his baseline run versus his halltech run. We're trying to accurately compare data on his car not add someone else's in. That's confounding the data.
If we wanted to be helpful id ask him to do datalogging during the runs and during testing. I always datalog any mod.
Datalog air intake volume per rpm in the same gear versus intake air temperature, ECT, and the ambient temperature sensor.
This along with trap speed data and 60-130 data will help you know if your mods made power.
Once you know your mods made power THEN start looking for a better e.t. with e t. you may find other things you then want to address like launch traction
I would be interested to what your C8 runs as well. Post up your numbers, let’s see them.
I would be interested to what your C8 runs as well. Post up your numbers, let’s see them.
Trying to find a comparison DA that can help you all with your testing conditions. This is closest in my last testing session on intakes.
Yes that's a 1.8x 60 foot because it's no prep traction. Again as you can see. Ignore that and e.t. focus on trap speed like it shows. Focus on 1/8 to 1/4 mph pickup if you are trying to assess power.
If you all are assessing TRACTION that's a different thing
Now put your car in 4th gear and grab the following data....
Here you can compare your air intake volume before and after any changes.
I'm sure you know your intake air volume will tell you about power.
All this can help you in your testing to get you ready for better times.
The e.t. will come. It's not what you care about in testing performance mods. You want data that will speak to power differences so you can know what mods are doing, what mods to choose and then you can go focus on e.t.
Is this your car? Good information but I won't be using the draggy to record information just for simple bolt-ons. I am an old school guy. I just don't have time for gathering that type of data at the track. I would miss all of the fun with the guys. If I was still bracket racing maybe so. The data may be important to other members.
Here's a post of mine from back in April 2022. The Halltech intake really only shows gains for about 750 RPM worth of powerband, and in that same 750 RPM range, is absolutely decimated by the Corsa intake. Plenty will disagree with me which is fine, but the Halltech design is basically nothing more than an enlarged stock design retaining the negative attributes of it, including reusing the restrictive/small factory inlets along with the forcing already turbulent air to make an immediate 90-degree bend as soon as it passes through the filter media.
Originally Posted by Kracka
If the absolute top-end is what you're after, here is a comparison I made Halltech vs. Corsa from just 5,000 to 6,500 RPM.
Halltech:
Corsa:
Originally Posted by Kracka
Quick summary of peak numbers with gains, in order of appearance, so we have it documented:
Won't disagree at all. Halltech hits pretty hard at low end but kind of smooth out on top end similar to stock. AFE seems to pull very hard up top. I guess that's similar to the Corsa. One member trapped 125 with a simple bolt-on down here in Orlando with AFE. But for now I am satisfied with my Halltech. Thanks for the info.
Is this your car? Good information but I won't be using the draggy to record information just for simple bolt-ons. I am an old school guy. I just don't have time for gathering that type of data at the track. I would miss all of the fun with the guys. If I was still bracket racing maybe so. The data may be important to other members.
Yes sir. I fully understand different strokes for different folks and I admit that I actually enjoy that part of it which is the nerdy data collection.
It's helped me figure out a lot of very costly mistakes over the years of building cars haha
Yes sir. I fully understand different strokes for different folks and I admit that I actually enjoy that part of it which is the nerdy data collection.
It's helped me figure out a lot of very costly mistakes over the years of building cars haha
So your C8 is stock? Have you done any track testing? The draggy is good to gauge performance but track vids have shown there is a difference between the actual track clock and the draggy. I actually go to the track to test out these mods that I install on my car.
I went with the Halltech because it's closely designed to the stock unit and makes a little more power over the drop-in filter and I paid 715 to my door. I truly believe all the CAIs make about the same power. Heck, the Eventuri supposed to make 18hp/17tq, but we have not heard/seen proof during actual track testing. I am open to track test one.
I went with the Halltech because it's closely designed to the stock unit and makes a little more power over the drop-in filter and I paid 715 to my door. I truly believe all the CAIs make about the same power. Heck, the Eventuri supposed to make 18hp/17tq, but we have not heard/seen proof during actual track testing. I am open to track test one.
Exactly 01Defense......the Halltech Intake made a little more power that the Attack Blue Filter. It wasn't like night and day so to speak. But I did noticed that the car was much smoother and a better response.
Again, ignore e.t. on your first run you were at a 1.73 60 foot.
On the halltek run you had a 1.67 60 foot.
Your e.t. improvement was all launch. The first 60 feet. Shifting, traction, launch is e.t. forget about that if you're trying to purely evaluate mods / power.
Like I said...trap speed and back half delta is power.
Your car without the halltek picked up 24.58 mph without the halltek in a worse DA.
Your car picked up 24.50mph in a better DA with the halltek.
If you're looking for objective power data that's it.
If you want a better e.t. throw on a drag slick and you'll run 3 tenths faster but you won't have made more power.
No Halltek
DA 2799
95.64 mph trap 1/8
120.22 trap speed 1/4
24.58 mph increase from 1/8 to 1/4
Halltek DA 2609
96.01 mph trap 1/8
120.51 mph trap speed 1/4
24.50 mph increase from 1/8 to 1/4
His car was quicker and faster and that's what matters to me. Without actual iat's during each run its hard to know what's actually going on. Car could have been more heat soaked with the Halltech, who knows. All I know is that with the simple mods I've done I've cut about 4 tenths off my times.
So your C8 is stock? Have you done any track testing? The draggy is good to gauge performance but track vids have shown there is a difference between the actual track clock and the draggy. I actually go to the track to test out these mods that I install on my car.
That is not true. Dragy is accurate to .05 and .5mph. I take it to the track on everything from AWD cars to front engine rwd cars. It's accurate as vbox which I also have and is what magazines and manufacturers use.
His car was quicker and faster and that's what matters to me. Without actual iat's during each run its hard to know what's actually going on. Car could have been more heat soaked with the Halltech, who knows. All I know is that with the simple mods I've done I've cut about 4 tenths off my times.
That's not what matters if you are trying to assess power modifications. If you are just having fun that's cool but e.t. is not used for assessing power changes.
You could literally drop .4 seconds in e.t. by running on a prepped surface vs non prepped and zero horsepower changes took place. The trap speeds will barely budge though.
If you want to assess power changes you look at datalogs of engine power, air intake, timing etc and then you look at acceleration data such as trap speeds, increase in mph from 1/8 to 1/4 and 60-130 times.
Obviously if you had a better 60-130 time but a worse e.t. you wouldn't think the car made more power when it has the better e.t. than 60-130 time. That's because e.t. is confounded by way too many other independent variables.
I this only to be helpful to those that are interested in actually assessing their modification changes. For those that are just horsing around and having fun then none of this matters anyway.
That's not what matters if you are trying to assess power modifications. If you are just having fun that's cool but e.t. is not used for assessing power changes.
You could literally drop .4 seconds in e.t. by running on a prepped surface vs non prepped and zero horsepower changes took place. The trap speeds will barely budge though.
If you want to assess power changes you look at datalogs of engine power, air intake, timing etc and then you look at acceleration data such as trap speeds, increase in mph from 1/8 to 1/4 and 60-130 times.
Obviously if you had a better 60-130 time but a worse e.t. you wouldn't think the car made more power when it has the better e.t. than 60-130 time. That's because e.t. is confounded by way too many other independent variables.
I this only to be helpful to those that are interested in actually assessing their modification changes. For those that are just horsing around and having fun then none of this matters anyway.
One thing that you may not be considering is that most of the power gains from these mods may be in the lower and midrange rpm 2,000-5,000 and will mostly show on an 1/8 mile run and not as much in the 1/8 to 1/4 times. And we all know our cars fall on their face in 5th gear.
One thing that you may not be considering is that most of the power gains from these mods may be in the lower and midrange rpm 2,000-5,000 and will mostly show on an 1/8 mile run and not as much in the 1/8 to 1/4 times. And we all know our cars fall on their face in 5th gear.
You are not between 2000 and 4500rpm in any run but literally for a couple milliseconds. You are launching at 3500rpm and shifting at redline in each gear.
The only time you are between 3500rpm and 4500rpm is a millisecond at launch that doesn't even get counted in your time... rollout
You are not between 2000 and 4500rpm in any run but literally for a couple milliseconds. You are launching at 3500rpm and shifting at redline in each gear.
The only time you are between 3500rpm and 4500rpm is a millisecond at launch that doesn't even get counted in your time... rollout
If you look at the rpm/mph charts for each gear you may change your view. I stated midrange up to 5,000 rpm not 4,500. If your car actually shifts at exactly 6,500rpm in every gear which mine will shift before that especially when shifting 3rd-5th gears you would still have 53mph of acceleration at or below 5,000 rpm. For a Z51 0-27mph, 35-45mph, 58-64mph, 84-89mph and 116-121mph.
That's 53mph of 121mph at or below 5,000 rpm if your shifting at 6,500. Think what you like but making more hp at lower and midrange rpm with the same peak hp will make your car faster.
If you look at the rpm/mph charts for each gear you may change your view. I stated midrange up to 5,000 rpm not 4,500. If your car actually shifts at exactly 6,500rpm in every gear which mine will shift before that especially when shifting 3rd-5th gears you would still have 53mph of acceleration at or below 5,000 rpm. For a Z51 0-27mph, 35-45mph, 58-64mph, 84-89mph and 116-121mph.
That's 53mph of 121mph at or below 5,000 rpm if your shifting at 6,500. Think what you like but making more hp at lower and midrange rpm with the same peak hp will make your car faster.
mine will actually shift slightly after 6500.
Anyways you said 2000rpm to 5000rpm.
There is literally zero time spent below 3500rpm and zero time that's counted below 4500rpm.
I said 4500rpm because that's mid range. After is upper on a 6500rpm car.
There is literally zero time spent below 3500rpm and zero time that's counted below 4500rpm.
I said 4500rpm because that's mid range. After is upper on a 6500rpm car.
My point is that you can make more power at lower than peak rpms with bolt ons, run lower et's and make the same peak hp. I don't have a data logger or a dragy, the drag strip is all I have for reference.
Your point is dead on. I don't see any significant improvement on the top end with bolt-ons The car is being pushed at the low end in order to get better ET’S.
My point is that you can make more power at lower than peak rpms with bolt ons, run lower et's and make the same peak hp. I don't have a data logger or a dragy, the drag strip is all I have for reference.
Your point was mistaken. You said lower to mid powerband.
The car is not at lower power band during wot runs. It is upper middle to redline the entire time.
If you want to feel peppier passing power while lugging the engine at 2000rpm, you go for low end gains. If you want the car to get somewhere faster your want top end gains.