PTM. Performance Traction Management question
I also just want to comment on the PTM modes. I personally drive my C8 in sport 1 (sport) on the track. I don’t find it intrusive at all, in contrast to dry, which is very intrusive. Even in sport you can lose the back if you’re too aggressive with the throttle coming out of a turn. In modes higher than sport 1 or sport you lose the esc or yaw control, but still retain some traction control. Some of the fastest drivers I know drive in sport. One did a 1.56 at VIR in a stock C7 Z06. In speaking to these drivers, they say the difference between sport and race or race2 in terms of lap times is very small, and you are giving up a safety cushion, although I wonder if any car intervention can save you from a snap oversteer as occurred here. The other issue with all the modes, is that they do nothing to prevent you from pushing wide, as happened here. Again, we all do what works for us and our personal driving styles and risk tolerance and there is no right or wrong.
It looked to me when coming out of that second apex too little wheel angle was indicative that he was planning to go wide and use that curb so he could open up the throttle earlier.
In fact, look at the throttle, he had FULL throttle before reaching that second apex. He only reduces throttle when he realized ohh ****, I am going too wide.
Left rear wheel went off the track and hit a bad curb/dirt/track transition spot that appears to have been hit by many other drivers. Once the rear loses traction, look at brakes, NONE, just major wheel input. Only when it is obvious the wall is approaching fast does he apply brakes.
Looks like a series of driver errors to me, not the fault of PTM. He was really pushing that Z06 hard, I think he just wanted that last apex at full throttle too soon to setup for that straight away to achieve max speed there.
He could say PTM was messing with him and made him lose focus there, but I think the bigger issue was he was laser focused on coming out of that apex at max throttle no matter what chasing that lower lap time.
Looks like a series of driver errors to me, not the fault of PTM. He was really pushing that Z06 hard, I think he just wanted that last apex at full throttle too soon to setup for that straight away to achieve max speed there.
He could say PTM was messing with him and made him lose focus there, but I think the bigger issue was he was laser focused on coming out of that apex at max throttle no matter what chasing that lower lap time.
Right from the horses mouth (Jay/steelankles):
When Marko turned into T16 he noticed power was cut, so he opened the steering wheel just for a moment to allow more power to engage. And then turned back in. Was less than a second
unfortunately that put him off line for 17, then had to put more steering angle for 17.
The car was rotating and left rear tire got cut on t17 apron, if you listen close you can hear the bang. Thats when pdr data showed 0psi
At that point it was unrecoverable…
BTW, What kind of lap times are you turning at VIR?
Regardless if PTM was holding him back or not, straightening the wheel and going wide off the line, he obviously thought he was still good going that wide. There was no hesitation, 100% throttle all the way until he blows the tire running off the apron.
Even with a cut tire, brakes would have been appropriate before hitting that wall.
If I was pushing my car that hard, I would definitely have Haggerty track day insurance!
Also, tangential, but the term “full throttle” is such a useless word these days, in reference to the driver’s accelerator pedal position, considering the vast majority or drivers in high powered cars at the track are now regularly going “full throttle” with the accel pedal even when they are not receiving actual full throttle and/or actual full engine power available (i.e. ignition timing is being pulled).
Overlays should start including a “percentage of accel pedal power/torque demand actually being provided” parameter to give us a clearer picture of just how far off the driver is in demand vs availability. It would also be a great self-coaching tool.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by PRE-Z06; Sep 8, 2023 at 02:09 AM.
Had PTM not activated, the traction loss may have initiated even earlier, but PTM is a double-edged sword; you can either use it to help drive a car out of a corner, or you can try to drive without ever using it and when it does engage, learn why and adapt your driving so that it doesn't engage again. The driver's application of throttle in both cases, is very different, although lap times may be close. PTM is a good safety tool when learning a new car or building speed, but my goal is always to drive the learning curve towards having it engage 0% of the time.
On the ground, however, you want your car to talk to you without interference. I am not in favor of black boxes modifying what a car will do in response to my inputs. This is done in the name of safety to keep the average driver out of trouble. PTM, traction control and ESC give you false feedback as to what your car can do and how it behaves at the limits. I want the limits clearly defined and the rest is, well, driver skill.
Additionally, I agree people driving fast cars much faster than their skill level should allow is dangerous, and is only facilitated because the laws of physics weren’t allowed to teach them freely.
People talk about ESC as a safety net, but what is safer, an elite driver with ESC/TC off who never spins or a 2sec slower driver who always runs with ESC/TC on? I believe it is generally the slower driver in most instances.
Additionally, I agree people driving fast cars much faster than their skill level should allow is dangerous, and is only facilitated because the laws of physics weren’t allowed to teach them freely.
People talk about ESC as a safety net, but what is safer, an elite driver with ESC/TC off who never spins or a 2sec slower driver who always runs with ESC/TC on? I believe it is generally the slower driver in most instances.
Had PTM not activated, the traction loss may have initiated even earlier, but PTM is a double-edged sword; you can either use it to help drive a car out of a corner, or you can try to drive without ever using it and when it does engage, learn why and adapt your driving so that it doesn't engage again. The driver's application of throttle in both cases, is very different, although lap times may be close. PTM is a good safety tool when learning a new car or building speed, but my goal is always to drive the learning curve towards having it engage 0% of the time.
You can set your preferred PTM mode in your z mode and then the mode selector becomes a PTM mode selector. Extremely convenient.
As for PTM mode I'd pick which one meets your preference. No one can tell you what PTM mode is right for you.
On a new to me wet track if I had slicks on the car I'd 100 percent use a different one than on a dry track that I consider my local backyard track.
Often My personal preference is PTM Sport on street tires as I'm not doing time attacks and competing. I'm just having fun trying to set personal best times. It's weekend warrior mode to me lol.
Race 1 on r comps would make sense for someone who knows the track and is comfortable with it.
You know what Race 2 is and you know if you want to use it. If you are confident with the car and that track and have already been setting records at it and want to experience zero intervention it's there.
DISCLAIMER ON ALL PTM MODES EXCEPT WET: be warned that literally all ptm modes except wet mode will force the suspension into track mode. Wet mode puts the suspension in sport mode (mid setting). This is great for most tracks but tracks like Sebring that are incredibly bumpy.... incredibly....you may find there to be nowhere near the suspension modulation you need. This literally forces you to not be able to use PTM at Sebring. You can choose competitive drive mode though if you want some level of ESC/TC and soft suspension.
And yes you can spin in PTM Sport. I missed an apex in 15 and was coasting on turn in a few feet off the line. Around she wanted to go! Now one could wonder what would happen if I didn’t add all the opposite lock…
But, pro drivers use the TC for the advantage not learning. Driver aids aren’t teaching someone how to drive a car optimally.
I will agree that they can help someone learn with a safety net, for those that need it though, don’t get me wrong. It is just wrong to say that the aids are directly teaching the person to drive the car, as was suggested above. ( @AHP I think you may have minced my words above).
Here is a good video where the driver is “learning” from the driver aids. In this case, the driver learned how to press the accelerator to the floor when there is no chance for WOT. Then, when the algorithm wouldn’t give them throttle, they opened the steering a bit until it did give them throttle, and then turned again.
https://youtu.be/XlwficODXo0?si=6sGUK36gtt381M5_
I whole heartedly disagree. It is very obvious and you can hear the impact of the left rear tire as it hits the pot hole at the edge of the apron. If you watch this guy on the track many laps before this crash, he routinely ran the car to the maximum extent of the finished road surface and in several cases appear to have half a tire in the dirt.
I don't think it would have mattered TC / PTM on or off, he hit the hole and that popped the rear end up breaking traction.
But yea, as the person above said, nannies on or off that guy was gonna crash. If anything he probably would’ve crashed much sooner with the nannies completely off, with how he was driving.
















