Do you need a catch can?
And they designed the DCT too.... engineers don't solely design cars. Marketing and Accounting have a lot of input. Sometimes too much. Spent a lot of years in engineering in the aerospace business. Sadly, sometimes suboptimal designs were put into service due to competing priorities. Sometimes it didn't matter, sometimes it mattered a lot. And by a lot I mean losing out on a $3B aircraft opportunity.
So.... I'll decide what is "needed" or not and do the best I can to keep the car happy. And me too.
And they designed the DCT too.... engineers don't solely design cars. Marketing and Accounting have a lot of input. Sometimes too much. Spent a lot of years in engineering in the aerospace business. Sadly, sometimes suboptimal designs were put into service due to competing priorities. Sometimes it didn't matter, sometimes it mattered a lot. And by a lot I mean losing out on a $3B aircraft opportunity.
So.... I'll decide what is "needed" or not and do the best I can to keep the car happy. And me too.
I’m tracking my car and will report back on how much or little oil is in the can after the days tracking
1) Does using a catch can INCREASE the amount of oil, due to changes in pressure to the PCV system, the lower velocity of the air flow allowing more oil vapor to cool and condensate into droplets, etc...
2) Does the current OEM solution actually lead to PROBLEMS. Just because we captured some oil, doesn't mean that that oil would cause issues.
The answers appear to be, "possibly" for #1, and "no, not really" for #2...
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
There are plenty of GM fleet vehicles with GDI motors and millions of them are over 100k in miles over their lifetimes and it doesn't seem to be a big issue.
It's like when some guys get a new Glock. They have to go in and upgrade this and upgrade that, because the steel guide rod doesn't flex like the factory plastic one does, and they dump all sorts of "upgrades" in it, meanwhile the stock ones don't seem to have issues and they pass insane torture tests without breaking a sweat...
The aftermarket is very good at marketing... And preying on the fear that your $80k-$120k car, your pride and joy, will grenade if you don't buy their $200 product, manages to convince a lot of people, who then evangelize the product in order to justify buying it... Meanwhile, I can't find a SINGLE report of an LT2 motor having issues in this area after nearly half a decade... SMH.
I mean, that is the main topic for this thread... the car NEEDING it or not... Not personal preferences or theories... Is there an actual documented problem, and does the catch can reduce or eliminate it?
So far, the internet and fleet data says no, to both...
So, anyone who uses the argument that a can increases the oil isn't thinking beyond their own nose.
So, anyone who uses the argument that a can increases the oil isn't thinking beyond their own nose.
So, anyone who uses the argument that a can increases the oil isn't thinking beyond their own nose.
We can debate back and forth why each of us THINKS what we think, but at the end of the day there are two things that can't really be argued... 1) Corvette Engineers said flat out, not a problem, they designed all this into the motor itself, and 2) there do not appear to be ANY instances or data of whatever oil goes into the motor, causing any issues.
When you look at the oil captured after 1000 miles, its like, WOW, look, its several table spoons!
Which means that for every 10 miles, there might be 1 DROP of oil entering the intake manifold... It just isn't enough to be worried about, and after all these years, if valves were failing or acting up because of this, we would know. So we can argue about why we think it WOULD be a problem, but the facts appear to be that it just isn't...
















