Future of the NCRS.......

Popular Reply
I have been a member of NCRS since 1985. My relationship with NCRS (and it's members / leadership) has been up and down over the years.
I have judged many years, and many categories over the years. I have also contributed to many of the updates to NCRS judging manuals, as well as helping to work on the first edition of some manuals (1973-1974, 1975-1977).
I also have the distinction (I guess you can call it that) of having been asked to quit NCRS by both the President of NCRS, and the National Judging Chairman of NCRS, within a month of each other.
There is a former NCRS official that, to this day, will not talk to me.
Some of you may recall Dale Pearman. Dale was a real character, a long time member of NCRS, and just about as irreverent as anyone could be. Dale may be best known for his discovery, and subsequent restoration of the 1962 Corvette LeMans race car. The only 1962 Corvette to have ever raced at LeMans.
The last time I was physically in the same room with Dale (just before his passing) he extracted two promises from me.
1. He made me promise not to quit NCRS. He said you cannot change an organization from the outside.
2. He also made me promise to continue to push NCRS to publish their annual financial information. This is the info they file with the IRS as a non-profit organization.
After many conversations with various officials (including the one that will not talk to me), NCRS started publishing their annual financial information. I was one of the first to applaud and congratulate the organization on taking this step.
Dale was right, you cannot change an organization from the outside. And their have been a lot of changes, many of them good positive changes, since I first joined in 1985.
NCRS is about original cars, and restoring them to original condition. The judging is strict, and it needs to be. Seriously, how many Corvettes get touted at Barrett Jackson as an NCCC or Classic Chevy Club award winner. Now, just to be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with either of those fine organizations, and I support their efforts to promote the car hobby.
But it is "NCRS Award Winner", "NCRS Top Flight", "NCRS Duntov Award" that makes people sit up and take notice.
NCRS is not for everyone, and for a brief while I thought it was not for me anymore (I was wrong), but no one can deny the impact that NCRS has had on the Corvette restoration hobby.
But we are not done. There is still plenty of work to do to make NCRS better than it is today, financially viable, and more in tune with attracting new members. That is a big challenge, but it is not impossible. It just needs the right people, properly motivated, and with a desire to make the organization better than when they found it.






"Dear Members,
As previously announced in my Winter Restorer column, Gary Mortimer retired at the end of his current term, which was effective on Thursday, March 17th. Gary's retirement was a Board decision, taken as a first step in addressing NCRS's financial situation, which is discussed in my Spring Restorer column.
The Board's plan was for Eric Mortimer to take charge of operations in Cincinnati, and we had offered him increased responsibilities. Unexpectedly, late Thursday afternoon March 17th I received an email from Eric announcing that he is resigning effective March 31st.
The Board spent Thursday evening and much of Friday putting together a plan to handle the various tasks formerly handled by the Cincinnati office. This plan will take some time to implement and there will undoubtedly be some bumps in the road, but with your patience and understanding we will get through this.
Best regards,
Mike Ingham"
Last edited by Don Rickles; Mar 20, 2016 at 09:25 AM. Reason: DB
Last edited by Loren Smith; Mar 20, 2016 at 09:53 AM.






The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Hey War Bonnet, have you talked to John Kane about the shake up? As the Director for Region III, John must have participated in those board meetings on Thursday and Friday.




It was publically posted that the thread yesterday would be shut down, insinuating that the discussion of this topic is somehow taboo to me or someone else. I removed that remark because it was a public comment about site moderation and contained vague, untrue reasoning for it. As does this post.
It was pointed out in a complaint yesterday about the thread that the OPs name seemed fake and the vague opening post seemed designed to again stir the pot here. I agreed with that member and closed it. Every time I make a decision to close or not close it makes someone happy and someone not. I apologize to other members if they felt this decision supressed discussion. That was not the intent.
As I explained yesterday, I have zero interest in this discussion, although I'll admit the constant drone of NCRS bash/NCRS defending is tedious.
However, any time I have shut down these threads, it has been because the discussion had either deteriorated to pointless back and forth and/or featured exchanges of personal hostility that would have closed any thread on this forum.
Please feel free to discuss this topic without fear of the thread(s) being closed as long as the disrespect and hostility stays out of them, as well as commentary about moderating those threads. These parameters are asked of members in any thread in any section.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please address them by PM.

Always very kind to me!If our discussion remains civil, there's no reason to remove it....
Hey War Bonnet, have you talked to John Kane about the shake up? As the Director for Region III, John must have participated in those board meetings on Thursday and Friday.

It was publically posted that the thread yesterday would be shut down, insinuating that the discussion of this topic is somehow taboo to me or someone else. I removed that remark because it was a public comment about site moderation and contained vague, untrue reasoning for it. As does this post.
It was pointed out in a complaint yesterday about the thread that the OPs name seemed fake and the vague opening post seemed designed to again stir the pot here. I agreed with that member and closed it. Every time I make a decision to close or not close it makes someone happy and someone not. I apologize to other members if they felt this decision supressed discussion. That was not the intent.
As I explained yesterday, I have zero interest in this discussion, although I'll admit the constant drone of NCRS bash/NCRS defending is tedious.
However, any time I have shut down these threads, it has been because the discussion had either deteriorated to pointless back and forth and/or featured exchanges of personal hostility that would have closed any thread on this forum.
Please feel free to discuss this topic without fear of the thread(s) being closed as long as the disrespect and hostility stays out of them, as well as commentary about moderating those threads. These parameters are asked of members in any thread in any section.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please address them by PM.

Thank you for those words!
Older man's sport is right and we'll have to see if some cadre of 65 year olds is waiting in the wings to step in. I turn 65 in two months and have been shedding professional and volunteer duties rapidly to spend more time with family, etc..

Older man's sport is right and we'll have to see if some cadre of 65 year olds is waiting in the wings to step in. I turn 65 in two months and have been shedding professional and volunteer duties rapidly to spend more time with family, etc..
Last edited by Don Rickles; Mar 20, 2016 at 03:22 PM.












