When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by pauldana
Bee Jay, have you ever lifted your vett from just the center under the engine? via the crossover? your, or at least mine, shocke toreres will spread apart.. at this time you could adjust your spreader bar very easly, and this may give you what you are looking for..
btw, Chris, my middle son , you meet him a few times, put in some new LED headlights in his jeep... they are all plastic and give amazing ligh... and weigh at about a pound less each light... know its not a lot, but there is 4 pounds right there!!!!
good luck brother! p:-)
Temporary hijack here. Can you start a thread with more info on those? Thanks.
Why would this be stronger than a welded up tubular a arm with a cross member?
Originally Posted by RickyBerg
As discussed earlier in the thread, the problem with the VBP upper arms is lack of support for the legs of the control arm to the cross that allows them to flex and bend.
I would say that ANY control arm with a better and more solid construction is stronger then the VBP:s.
Bee Jay, The post wasn't that the SPC arm was better or worse than the welded up arm but that they are proven to work. I enjoy following your car and if searching for something your topics are some of the ones I'd click on first. Hopefully all of our posts will help other forum members
This seems to be a big problem in the world today, not with just automotive parts but just about everything, a manufacture sales us a product that is junk!!!!!!!!!!! & we are expected to fix it! and it seems to be ok with everyone??????? very confusing
George, I got this directly from VBP site: and my tires are 300 I believe... just dont have that great of ware??
]
I think that 1-2 neg camber for track is allowing for a-arms with slop and rubber bushings. Maybe even stockish tall sidewall tires. I have all poly and a IR heat gun to test the heat across the face of the tire.
For some reason, even though I no longer own a C-3, I read through this entire discussion. maybe because I enjoy technical discussions.
One thing that jumps out at me, is that nobody from VB&P has stepped in to either defend their product(s), or explain why they built their parts in the way they did. One other thing I find interesting, is if you look at pictures of VB&P parts, and the VanSteel parts that were pictured, they look almost identical.
Given that C-3 modifications and/or restorations are a popular activity, at least in the Corvette world, they are nonetheless "small potatoes" in the overall automotive aftermarket. I highly doubt that there are "many" manufacturers of parts, but there are probably many repackagers/resellers. Therefore, buyer beware!!
One thing that jumps out at me, is that nobody from VB&P has stepped in to either defend their product(s), or explain why they built their parts in the way they did.
I did a search on their user "VBP" and the only posts I see from them are advertising. No support posts or answering questions. That is their right as a supporting vendor, but I still find it unfortunate that VBP only uses the forum for ads.
I did a search on their user "VBP" and the only posts I see from them are advertising. No support posts or answering questions. That is their right as a supporting vendor, but I still find it unfortunate that VBP only uses the forum for ads.
And that's one of the points I was getting at. In either the C-5 general discussion, or the wheels and tires discussion, here at CF, as well as a rant on the LS1tech site, somebody is parading out a "warning" about CCW wheels. Seems he has a set of the 'CCW Classic' wheels, that A) are 11 years old; B) been used with race rubber on the track; and C) he bought used to begin with, and the wheels are showing some stress cracks. He's claiming "poor quality", and feels they should be replaced either for free, or next to nothing.
CCW stepped in on both sites and explained both the offer they made to the "whiner", to replace the cracked centers at cost, as well as explaining that these wheel centers are 3 designs old. The wheels have been updated, due to increased stresses now generated by grippier race tires.
Temporary hijack here. Can you start a thread with more info on those? Thanks.
I will try and find the lights... they are expensive ... about $250 EACH think they are sold by "truck light"
Originally Posted by gkull
I think that 1-2 neg camber for track is allowing for a-arms with slop and rubber bushings. Maybe even stockish tall sidewall tires. I have all poly and a IR heat gun to test the heat across the face of the tire.
You race a LOT more than I.. Thus, I'll go with what you think... but i am running all poly except the motor mounts and rear end snub. The A-arms are stock, and I want to replace them... but I do like the design of SBC arms much more.. they seem to have a lot more adjustably, and did I read somewhere they had bearings instead of rubber or poly??
You race a LOT more than I.. Thus, I'll go with what you think... but i am running all poly except the motor mounts and rear end snub. The A-arms are stock, and I want to replace them... but I do like the design of SBC arms much more.. they seem to have a lot more adjustably, and did I read somewhere they had bearings instead of rubber or poly??
The thing that scares me about multi adjustable tubular A-arms with lots of jam nuts. Is that it makes many more points of failure. Once you are exceeding about 100- 120 mph in an un-roll caged car without a 5 point harness , neck brace, and Snell rated helmet. kiss your *** good bye when anything to do with steering goes.
I don't know if you have ever seen a Vette in a wreck. They just come apart. Years ago BJ took the metal guard rails out of his doors. To save weight. I lightened my car and added 1 3/4 .134+ wall heavy DOM mild steel cage, 5 point seats, fire system, and seam welded frame and bracing
The thing that scares me about multi adjustable tubular A-arms with lots of jam nuts. Is that it makes many more points of failure. Once you are exceeding about 100- 120 mph in an un-roll caged car without a 5 point harness , neck brace, and Snell rated helmet. kiss your *** good bye when anything to do with steering goes.
I don't know if you have ever seen a Vette in a wreck. They just come apart. Years ago BJ took the metal guard rails out of his doors. To save weight. I lightened my car and added 1 3/4 .134+ wall heavy DOM mild steel cage, 5 point seats, fire system, and seam welded frame and bracing
yea,,, thats something I wasn't thinking of... very good point
The safety part was also in my mind when I discovered my VBP control arms where loosing their shape..
When it comes to the SPC arms with their jam-nuts, this is the same system already used in other places in the front end/steering on Corvettes an numerous other cars.
However, if one are not happy with the jam-nuts only, one can always drill small holes and install securing wires as used in the aviation industry.
I just checked my jam-nuts on my SPC arms after a weekend on the track and they seem to be OK.