Engine Build





And I am only making it a point of reference , no matter what he does 400 ft pounds of tq with a 3.08 in a full weight C-3 is not going to break any records . . But this is a PROVEN amount of power , has a parts list as does the ZZ383 if he chooses to build something along those lines..
Every one and I mean everyone can do better then GM but reality and words seldom match up. I beat the hell out of the ZZ product line and it never failed me even shifting at 7200 rpm over and over again ..
As has been mentioned I have looked at the ZZ engines alot. The ZZ5 has the suggested hp & torq but sometimes it is a wonder to me how they are doing it. Alot smaller cam all the way around, the fast burn heads are very comparable to the Iron Eagles at .400 / .500" lift. Sometimes you got to read between the lines , or literally read the lines. The ZZ5 promotional literature flatly states " this engine wants more cam" . Well, my cam is more cam, and just alittle more. And the ZZ 383, 425/450hp have the same cam. And it is almost identical to the one I'm specing. Just a touch more lift. with an LSA of 112 I think they have smoothed it out too much. The 383 is going to give me plenty of vacuum for my accessories and as said plenty of grunt. Will it run out of legs at 5000 rpms? Maybe, but I'll bet it will go to at least 5400. Do I run 5000 rpms on the highway, I hope not. Do you know when the last time I saw 5000 rpms in this oldchev. I'm not that young, its been along time. I haven't said this before, but I have a C5, Do you know when was the last time I saw 5000 rpms in the C5, not very often. Although I did hit the rev limiter once down at Crusin Ocean City. Anyway, I have been listiening to you fellas and i might have this all wrong. But I didn't spec this motor. A dye hard engine machinest/ racer did. By the way I really, really do appreciate your opinions. And I'm trying to learn by them. That's one reason why I'm not completely sold on this cam. Now one of you said my specs look like they belong on a 350ci. Yeh I might agree because it is almost exactly what I said in the beginning when I started this thread and I was thinking 350 back then. but then everyone told me my cam was too big. well if you go 383 the cam ought to look too small. But, gues what the Comps Cam rep said to me just yesterday, He suggested # 08-422-8, just a touch smaller. If I go smaller, I probably will have a really smooth running 383, with plenty of pull from 1500 rpms all the way thru to 5400, and PLENTY of vacuum. So why am I stating the 08-423-8, I don't know, that's what the builder spec'd. Dave.





As has been mentioned I have looked at the ZZ engines alot. The ZZ5 has the suggested hp & torq but sometimes it is a wonder to me how they are doing it. Alot smaller cam all the way around, the fast burn heads are very comparable to the Iron Eagles at .400 / .500" lift. Sometimes you got to read between the lines , or literally read the lines. The ZZ5 promotional literature flatly states " this engine wants more cam" . Well, my cam is more cam, and just alittle more. And the ZZ 383, 425/450hp have the same cam. And it is almost identical to the one I'm specing. Just a touch more lift. with an LSA of 112 I think they have smoothed it out too much. The 383 is going to give me plenty of vacuum for my accessories and as said plenty of grunt. Will it run out of legs at 5000 rpms? Maybe, but I'll bet it will go to at least 5400. Do I run 5000 rpms on the highway, I hope not. Do you know when the last time I saw 5000 rpms in this oldchev. I'm not that young, its been along time. I haven't said this before, but I have a C5, Do you know when was the last time I saw 5000 rpms in the C5, not very often. Although I did hit the rev limiter once down at Crusin Ocean City. Anyway, I have been listiening to you fellas and i might have this all wrong. But I didn't spec this motor. A dye hard engine machinest/ racer did. By the way I really, really do appreciate your opinions. And I'm trying to learn by them. That's one reason why I'm not completely sold on this cam. Now one of you said my specs look like they belong on a 350ci. Yeh I might agree because it is almost exactly what I said in the beginning when I started this thread and I was thinking 350 back then. but then everyone told me my cam was too big. well if you go 383 the cam ought to look too small. But, gues what the Comps Cam rep said to me just yesterday, He suggested # 08-422-8, just a touch smaller. If I go smaller, I probably will have a really smooth running 383, with plenty of pull from 1500 rpms all the way thru to 5400, and PLENTY of vacuum. So why am I stating the 08-423-8, I don't know, that's what the builder spec'd. Dave.
EDIT: If you use the 72 CC heads ( Biggest chamber available) with flat tops and that cam go with 7 CC flat tops. That gets your DCR @ 8 to 1. If you go 5 CC flat tops with optimized quench you are @ 8.14 to 1 DCR. Won't run on pump gas with iron heads and that DCR. 8 to 1 is a push.
Last edited by 63mako; Jan 10, 2015 at 11:20 PM.





oldchev, it sounds like your not looking for high RPM performance and with what you have chosen will work well for good grunt.
That being said you could get a little more of both with higher flowing heads and higher stall torque converter. It's you build so up to you. obviously $$ becomes a factor at some point.
Just keep in mind that filling the cylinder on each intake stroke is the goal. Anything that can assist that goal without giving up more somewhere else will produce more torque, ergo more power. More torque at higher RPMs is more power.
Things that can achieve that goal are more valve lift, better flowing heads, greater duration (at the cost of potentially sacrificing low end somewhat), good scavenging, free flowing exhaust, low intake restriction, cool dense intake air.
My 3.08 rear with the TH-350 has a long hard pull when shifting from 2nd to 3rd gear. My solution was to rev higher in second gear. Yours is to have more grunt to pull 3rd gear, either will work.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Any heads have to be checked out thoroughly. My Competition Ported AFR 195's had tight guides < .001. Had to open them up a little out of the box.
But also looking at the AFR-180s, at Summit I see 3 different parts #, 0916, 0918, 0919. They all look the same. Which ones you talking about.Good luck
Good luck
With my build I ended up @ 10.24:1 SCR and 8.45:1 DCS. I've run both 93 and 87 octane with no ping. I'm running a 165deg high flow stat and high flow aluminum water pump. The engine has never been above 165 even before breakin when all was tight.
After porting with Felpro #1206 gasket:
Last edited by madam; Jan 13, 2015 at 12:41 PM. Reason: forgot photo





EDIT: If you use the 72 CC heads ( Biggest chamber available) with flat tops and that cam go with 7 CC flat tops. That gets your DCR @ 8 to 1. If you go 5 CC flat tops with optimized quench you are @ 8.14 to 1 DCR. Won't run on pump gas with iron heads and that DCR. 8 to 1 is a push.
Last edited by 63mako; Jan 14, 2015 at 11:40 PM.





Engine specs posted and iron heads will require a minimum of premium fuel, possibly dialed back timing and/or Race fuel. With the only change being aluminum heads the same size and chambers you can go with regular or midgrade. I ran the numbers.











