When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This still doesn't answer my question. Why would GM take their flagship car and deliver it "non optimal"? I've seen cars lower than Vettes go on/off transport trucks as a 12 year tech and a 8 year service advisor.
Why would GM align the car to take care of $2000 worth of PS2 tires if it needed to be lowered again and aligned at the dealer to be "optimal"?
This has always made zero sense to me.
If any Z06 was road tested by a magazine or what not why wasn't it lowered and realigned? You can see these cars, especially the C5's and C6's were not lowered.
The car is delivered in "street duty" form, there is a spec for the car to be used for "track duty" which is to be lowered, or it was on the C5 anyway.
Well some of the C5's came with blocks on the shocks for transport, and some Dealers didn't take them out ??? it only makes sense that on a transport they would not want the car to have a bunch of movement ???
Well some of the C5's came with blocks on the shocks for transport, and some Dealers didn't take them out ??? it only makes sense that on a transport they would not want the car to have a bunch of movement ???
How would you put "blocks" on the shocks? I currently have mine apart and don't see how this would be possible or how it would effect ride height as spring vs control arm dictates ride height.
This still doesn't answer my question. Why would GM take their flagship car and deliver it "non optimal"? I've seen cars lower than Vettes go on/off transport trucks as a 12 year tech and a 8 year service advisor.
Why would GM align the car to take care of $2000 worth of PS2 tires if it needed to be lowered again and aligned at the dealer to be "optimal"?
This has always made zero sense to me.
If any Z06 was road tested by a magazine or what not why wasn't it lowered and realigned? You can see these cars, especially the C5's and C6's were not lowered.
The car is delivered in "street duty" form, there is a spec for the car to be used for "track duty" which is to be lowered, or it was on the C5 anyway.
I can't answer your question. I'm just telling you what the dealership service manager told me.
I do remember the story on this Forum from a few years ago about a guy who purchased a 2003 50th anniversary Corvette and was about to sell it less than a year later because of the "harsh ride" he experienced with the then new magnetic ride control. He was frustrated and about to let the car go until another member advised him to check to make sure that the dealership removed the shipping blocks/bushings installed by the factory. Turned out they were still there even after two dealership oil changes.
How would you put "blocks" on the shocks? I currently have mine apart and don't see how this would be possible or how it would effect ride height as spring vs control arm dictates ride height.
From: Out of Site...Out of Mind. Corvette: anything else is just transportation.
St. Jude Donor '09 thru '20
I knew the moment I saw the Stingray revealed at the NCM, my C5's days were numbered. Seeing it in person and the test drive hammered it home. No amount of money thrown into the C5 would be a sutible comparison and depreciation of the C5 would continue to dive once the C7 hit the streets.
I knew the moment I saw the Stingray revealed at the NCM, my C5's days were numbered. Seeing it in person and the test drive hammered it home. No amount of money thrown into the C5 would be a sutible comparison and depreciation of the C5 would continue to dive once the C7 hit the streets.
Those are not for ride height, they are to limit shock travel during transport.
Shocks do not control ride height in any way, on any car.
I did learn something though, thanks for the link.
I was referring to the ride height for transport, didn't want the C 5 blocks as the same for the C 7 just the point of protecting the car for transport ??
I was referring to the ride height for transport, didn't want the C 5 blocks as the same for the C 7 just the point of protecting the car for transport ??
To protect the shocks and maybe the car from dropping down far enough on a bump or bad road to damage the undercarriage.
My guess is T hooks where used for transport and the car was pulled down onto those blocks so there was no movement during transport.....but I dunno.
I'd like to have a C7, but the thought of parting with that much money along with the fact they would give me a ridiculously low amount for my C5 keeps the C5 in the garage. Besides I really do like my C5 - it has been a trouble free car for the 7+ years I have owned it, has classic styling, still puts a smile on my face when I drive it and best of all, it is paid for.
counts. Most people think mine is a new one. Only Vette goobs know anything about our cars. I get raves on mine every time I go out and with the mods and tune, it has all the power I can use in today's traffic. Besides, older gets better and more rare as time passes.
Dave
I may be the odd man out..... I really like the C7.......
Took me some time but it has grown on me.
Still not crazy about that HUGE black rear valance...
I have seen them painted body color and it looks 100% better...
IMO
In all honesty the C7Z has grown on me as well.... If given the opportunity I would probably trade/sell up for one. As someone else posted, my modified C5Z gets far more attention than the C7Z when out and about... Two totally different Corvettes. I like them both.
A friend of mine bought a new 2015 and the Dealer slapped a big white Dealer sticker on the black valance, red car !!!! said I would not have even picked the car up until they took it off !!!
I find the topic a bit humorous probably because I have a longer point of view. In 1962 when the Stingray came out there was mass moaning that the side scoop was gone. When the C4s (BTW that was the first generation to be designated Cx) it was hated because it didn't look like the Stingrays/StingRays/Sharks. When the C6 came out with fixed headlights everyone complained they weren't flip ups. With the C7 it was the shape of the tail lights were too much like the Camaro (although the Mid Years had tail lights taken from the full size 58 Chevys). Each time you would have thought the end of the world was nigh...and each time the car became wildly successful. When people coming to the Museum would ask me what was the best Corvette I would always answer, the one that gets made tomorrow.