C5 Tech Corvette Tech/Performance: LS1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

cold air intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #41  
terpesman's Avatar
terpesman
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
From: Phila PA
Default

I don't know anything about physics or ram-air principles and I really don't care about going any faster in my '04 Z06...

That being said, I think the looks really cool

haltech

Now, where's that darn radar detector????
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #42  
terpesman's Avatar
terpesman
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
From: Phila PA
Default

I don't know anything about physics or ram-air principles and I really don't care about going any faster in my '04 Z06...

That being said, I think the looks really cool

halltech

Now, where's that darn radar detector????
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #43  
beary58's Avatar
beary58
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 6
From: Edmond ok
Default

Originally Posted by Korreck
That's all very true and has NOTHING to do with the topic being discussed. The air density of which you cited above has to do with lift, not engine performance.
Not true. Density Altitude charts take in the effect on the engine performance. You only have to ask pilots who live in higher altitudes why they buy the same type of planes with turbo chargers.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #44  
bremillard's Avatar
bremillard
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 90 droptop
Why would you think the VARARAM would show an improvement on a static dyno??????? Hello...............
Then you never ran it at the track to see if it actually worked, then you take it off and dog it. Nice experiment Thank god I'm not taking your advice on speed parts. The lack of common sense is amazing!!!

I guess you are one of Vararam's faithful who actually think that you are getting some type of forced air from their intake. It ain't happening dude!. If there is any positive affect on horsepower it would be due to cold air not ram air. I have raced stock, superstock, supergas and super comp and have tested air scoops ad nauseum. I know(read that beyond a shadow of a doubt) what generates positive air pressure in an intake tract and what does not. THE BEST possible air scoop design needs almost 100 mph to show any positive pressure within it. If you add any type of filtering medium to the equation you will almost completely eliminate the positive pressure at any speed. Completely optimized, THE BEST air scoop design(pro stock style) is worth about 28 horsepower h.p. over none at all (at speeds over 160mph). You are correct about one thing though and that is the lack of common sense is truly amazing. -Bob
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 05:52 PM
  #45  
sxeC7's Avatar
sxeC7
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,269
Likes: 50
From: Dallas Texas
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'09-'10
Default

I love these so-called Cold/Ram Air threads. They really generate heated discussion and are fun reads. Me, I put on a Red Halltec Stinger, a hood seal, and opened up the Foglight Shrouds. Did I notice any performance improvement? Nope, but it looks good and gives me a warm fuzzy feeling.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #46  
Special K's Avatar
Special K
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,640
Likes: 0
From: Sunshine State
Default

Originally Posted by beary58
Not true. Density Altitude charts take in the effect on the engine performance. You only have to ask pilots who live in higher altitudes why they buy the same type of planes with turbo chargers.
No kidding. That's not what was said. Aircraft are rated for altitude, not depending on the air density on a certain day. Some of you people get so far off track I can't believe I even respond to a dumb statement like that.

Carry on. I'm outta this one.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 06:10 PM
  #47  
Dan_the_C5_Man's Avatar
Dan_the_C5_Man
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,561
Likes: 448
From: Atlanta metro Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by Korreck
No kidding. That's not what was said. Aircraft are rated for altitude, not depending on the air density on a certain day. Some of you people get so far off track I can't believe I even respond to a dumb statement like that.

Carry on. I'm outta this one.
..And you just keep digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole.. Good thing for our sake your an "engineer" and not a commercial airline pilot.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 06:27 PM
  #48  
BoYD's Avatar
BoYD
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek CA
Default

SO GETTING BACK ON TOPIC...

Anyone here have the Callaway Honker intake system? I'm thinking about it for my '02 coupe, but it's fairly pricey. About $500, not including installation.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #49  
Richin Chicago's Avatar
Richin Chicago
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington NC
Default

Originally Posted by Dan_the_C5_Man
..And you just keep digging yourself a deeper and deeper hole.. Good thing for our sake your an "engineer" and not a commercial airline pilot.

But how does that relate to an air intake? Colder "denser" air from what?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #50  
Dan_the_C5_Man's Avatar
Dan_the_C5_Man
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,561
Likes: 448
From: Atlanta metro Ga.
Default

Originally Posted by Richin Chicago
But how does that relate to an air intake? Colder "denser" air from what?
Hey Rich..

Well, in my view it's pretty simple..

cooler air=more dense=more HP, all other parameters being equal..
hotter air=less dense=less HP, all other parameters being equal..

Air temp under hood=hotter..
Air from outside / front of car=cooler..

Again, I'm not sure how I became the "Vararam champion", when I have no intentions on installing one.. But that fact does not exclude its value as a performance enhancer.

Last edited by Dan_the_C5_Man; Mar 28, 2005 at 06:53 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #51  
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by 90 droptop
Why would you think the VARARAM would show an improvement on a static dyno??????? Hello...............
Then you never ran it at the track to see if it actually worked, then you take it off and dog it. Nice experiment Thank god I'm not taking your advice on speed parts. The lack of common sense is amazing!!!



The dyno is only part of the story. At the very least I would have wanted to see what improvement, if any, would have been realized on the track. And again, I would not have made just one run. I would have made a series of runs on different days and documented the results taking into account DA, vehicle weight if I could, air pressure in the tires, 60ft times, and any other useful data I could have gathered.

To see no gain on the dyno, is hardly a reason to remove it in my opinion. Especially considering how hard it is to install.

Now if it showed no measureable improvement on the track, after multiple attempts..............then off it comes
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #52  
shurite44's Avatar
shurite44
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,027
Likes: 6
From: Shiloh Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by EB20003


The dyno is only part of the story. At the very least I would have wanted to see what improvement, if any, would have been realized on the track. And again, I would not have made just one run. I would have made a series of runs on different days and documented the results taking into account DA, vehicle weight if I could, air pressure in the tires, 60ft times, and any other useful data I could have gathered.

To see no gain on the dyno, is hardly a reason to remove it in my opinion. Especially considering how hard it is to install.

Now if it showed no measureable improvement on the track, after multiple attempts..............then off it comes
No kidding, after installing one of these I can not imagine pulling it so fast.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #53  
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by shurite44
...... I just don't get that, who cares about some numbers on a computer. Maybe some are not into drag racing but to be honest if I did not drag race I doubt if I would mod my car. If the thread starter is not racing I do not recommend the vararam, I think the C5 is already too fast for the street.

I could not agree more


If I didn't drag race then my car would be showroom bone stock. The reason why it is modified, and indeed the reason why it has the Vararam on it now and the Blackwing before that, is because I am looking for any edge on the track.........not the dyno........ I can get.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #54  
C5XTASY's Avatar
C5XTASY
Safety Car
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 10
From: Monticello MN
Default

Originally Posted by Dan_the_C5_Man
Hey Rich..

Well, in my view it's pretty simple..

cooler air=more dense=more HP, all other parameters being equal..
hotter air=less dense=less HP, all other parameters being equal..

Air temp under hood=hotter..
Air from outside / front of car=cooler..
This is all obviously true, and one of the reasons I will be installing a Vararam. The other reason is also linked to the cooler outside air, not only making additional power due to more oxygen, but the cooler air also keeping the timing from being pulled back, which will sometimes occur when drawing in warm underhood air. This is particularly true when launching from a stop, after sitting for awhile. This happened to me, and proved somewhat embarrassing. Also, I figure the
Vararam is the safest, water-injestion-wise, CAI out there, though a person must be alert with any of them in wet conditions.
Ed
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #55  
RogueVette's Avatar
RogueVette
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
From: TurtleCreek Twp Ohio
Cruise-In III Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by Korreck
I think to develop accurate info this has to be done over several sessions at the track.

Bob
See you say that but in the other thread where you stuck your foot in more then your mouth. BQuicksilver had done the same thing with better results from the Vararam. But maybe EB20003 is the be all end all.

Thankfully that's not the case. Or nobody would ever buy LG headers
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #56  
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaman
See you say that but in the other thread where you stuck your foot in more then your mouth. BQuicksilver had done the same thing with better results from the Vararam. But maybe EB20003 is the be all end all.

Thankfully that's not the case. Or nobody would ever buy LG headers

LGs headers are a very good choice. You cannot go wrong with them. But you cannot go wrong with a few of the other header choices out there either.

Aquaman, and everyone else; I have put over 300 miles on the Vararam so far, and I cannot for the life of me see how it would not improve my results at the track.

When you look at the design of the thing and what it actually does, take air in through intakes from outside the car and channel it directly to the throttle body, you ask yourself "why wouldn't this help?"

If you have ever driven along and put your hand out the window, and noticed the cooler temperature you felt as the car was rolling along at speed, much cooler than you would feel if the car were parked,..... and a hell of a lot cooler than if you could stick your hand through the firewall and under the hood..... you ask yourself "why wouldn't the Vararam work?"

Guys, it makes perfect sense to me. Too many people with absolutely nothing to gain by lying have reported improvement using it. The principles add up in that cooler air is more dense and carries more oxygen and that more oxygen results in more power.

It makes sense to me. I intend to give it a fair shake. I will be running it all season....

Furthermore..........I know about what a car with my modifications should run!!!!

I am about at the extent of the capabilities of my car with it's modifications. If anyone out there doubts me then find another car in my area, with my exact mods running quicker than mine is. This is not bragging, but last year with the Blackwing 12.5X is about all I could reasonably hope for. 12.4x if I really got lucky.

But my point is that if I listed my mods and asked people to guess my times, they would probably be in the 12.5 range. I know what a car with my mods will run. Indeed I modded it with the intent of making it competitive with, or slightly quicker than, a stock Z06 with an average or slightly better than average driver.

I know of one other person on this board to hit 12.20 with 3.42s, stock internals, 2600 stall, he had stock manifolds, and I believe he did it at a DA of around 500.

I could run from here to eternity with my last year's mods and never see 12.20. But if I see 12.2x with the Vararam or even 12.3x then I will certainly be a believer.

Last edited by '06 Quicksilver Z06; Mar 28, 2005 at 09:25 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #57  
RogueVette's Avatar
RogueVette
Safety Car
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,667
Likes: 0
From: TurtleCreek Twp Ohio
Cruise-In III Veteran
Default

EB,

Realize I'm just giving you sh*t.

I am a believer in the Vararam. That;s why I have one now too.

I think the Blackwing was a great filter I had it for 3 years. But I have too many friends that simply went faster with just a Vararam swap. It makes sense on paper and it reacts well in real life.

Just that simple.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To cold air intake

Old Mar 28, 2005 | 09:27 PM
  #58  
'06 Quicksilver Z06's Avatar
'06 Quicksilver Z06
Team Owner
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 38,314
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Aquaman
EB,

Realize I'm just giving you sh*t.

I am a believer in the Vararam. That;s why I have one now too.

I think the Blackwing was a great filter I had it for 3 years. But I have too many friends that simply went faster with just a Vararam swap. It makes sense on paper and it reacts well in real life.

Just that simple.
Oh, I know your statement about the LGs was in good fun
I got a grin out of it.

But I'll say it again, the more I drive around with this thing on my car, the more I am impressed with it. I am expecting measurable and demonstrable improvement from it this spring and summer. Especially this summer.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #59  
TheKing43's Avatar
TheKing43
Advanced
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 3
Default

I believe you can make a HP gain with the air intake, but only minimal...you have to upgrade all the components to have a balanced increase. Intake,Exhaust, Fuel, and Ignition. Each one will help the others perform up to their potential. The air Intake by itself is only as good as your Mass Airflow will allow, but you need the fuel and spark to accomodate the extra air too.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #60  
bremillard's Avatar
bremillard
Instructor
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Dan_the_C5_Man
Hey Rich..

Well, in my view it's pretty simple..

cooler air=more dense=more HP, all other parameters being equal..
hotter air=less dense=less HP, all other parameters being equal..

Air temp under hood=hotter..
Air from outside / front of car=cooler..

Again, I'm not sure how I became the "Vararam champion", when I have no intentions on installing one.. But that fact does not exclude its value as a performance enhancer.

The vararam is not completely worthless. It is expensive and hard to install and offers very little, if any, performance advantage over a tie wrapped K&N type filter. There is no measurable ram effect. The only possible benefit it may have is allowing cooler air into the engine. Put a thermometer where the stock intake ingests air and put another one where the Vararam ingests it's air. There will not be much difference while driving because G.M. has already arranged their unit to collect air that is cooler than where, say, an old muscle car might have(in the area of the carb/throttle body). My biggest problem with Vararam is the outlandish claim it makes. (This product is not alone in that area) I sold my Vararam because A. the guy running the dyno (a very knowledgable car person) varified what I already had suspected-that it was no better than what I had previously. And B. I had a buyer waiting for it and I was afraid he would buy a new one if I didn't act immediately. Now, I am like the other poster who bowed out of this thread because there is no winning this argument. If you like it great. I certainly have and like a lot of things that other people might find foolish. -Bob
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:10 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE