Differential Fluid, which do you use?
http://www.c66racing-synthetics.com/...ns/G2039PB.htm
Our Stage 2-5 differentials utilize a heavy duty clutch pack design w/ heavy duty clutch pack pre-load springs that are exclusive to our engineering design. Therefore, in order for our differentials to operate properly in a wide variety of performance conditions/applications, we require the use of Redline brand 75w/140 fully synthetic differential lubricant which has approx. 4% of Redline brand fully synthetic limited slip additive already blended in at the Redline Lubricants factory. We add an additional ounce of Redline fully synthetic limited slip additive to each bottle here at DTE for a total blend of 13%, that supports our heavy duty clutch pack design. We carry this blend here..
DO *NOT* use GM L.S.A. additive in *ANY* of our 75w/140 lubricants at all, in any capacity what-so-ever. That was fine with the old 75w/90 we used to use, but *NOT* for the new 75w/140 blend. If you choose to do this, we can assure you with 100% certainty that you *WILL* have clutch pack problems of some sort.....
If you have a stock differential w/ stock clutch packs or our Stage 1 model differential, we recommend the use of the standard 4% blend of Redline brand 75w/140 lubricant and pour in stright from the bottle. We also carry this blend here..
Thanks folks.

Best Regards,
DTE
Do you feel that stock GM fluid is insufficient for heavy duty use ???
Thanks,
DH
Do you feel that stock GM fluid is insufficient for heavy duty use ???
Thanks,
DH
We still see folks insist on using it for HP applications and we just cringe when we see that, knowing that the differential is screaming for dear life back there.... It might be fine for a 100% stone-stocker car, but that's about it and we wouldn't suggest that lube for *anything* other than grocery-getting type driving...ever.
To each his own though.

DTE
We still see folks insist on using it for HP applications and we just cringe when we see that, knowing that the differential is screaming for dear life back there.... It might be fine for a 100% stone-stocker car, but that's about it and we wouldn't suggest that lube for *anything* other than grocery-getting type driving...ever.
To each his own though.

DTE
I have fresh Stinky Smelly Stuff in there right now as they just redid my left side plate seal for the second time. Not sure if it was coincidental but shorty after draining the GM SSS and replacing with Mobil 1 gear oil in started leaking.I do track my car and will follow your advise...
DH
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts




Last edited by OhioDave; Aug 19, 2006 at 08:12 AM.

For strictly (sometimes spirited) street driving, do I need the 75-140?




For strictly (sometimes spirited) street driving, do I need the 75-140?
We used to use the 75w/90 in our HP differentials, as well as in stock differentials also, but it just wouldn't last for the long term in high performance applications. However, through testing, we found that the higher viscosity 75w/140 was quite a bit more tolerant to thermal break down and remained a bit thicker in high performance applications that generated a lot of driveline heat- from internal friction from the differential itself, heat transfer from the transmission and from radiant heat from the two super-heated exhaust pipes that run right next to either side of the differential.
We've found the differentials to run quieter, a bit cooler and the lubricant quality to remain more constant in quality over a greater amount of miles/time with the use of 75w/140. That's why we switched.
Hope that helps some and there are more threads on this subject around here that we go into more depth with this topic also.

DTE
Last edited by DTE Powertrain; Aug 18, 2006 at 04:52 PM.
We used to use the 75w/90 in our HP differentials, as well as in stock differentials also, but it just wouldn't last for the long term in high performance applications. However, through testing, we found that the higher viscosity 75w/140 was quite a bit more tolerant to thermal break down and remained a bit thicker in high performance applications that generated a lot of driveline heat- from internal friction from the differential itself, heat transfer from the transmission and from radiant heat from the two super-heated exhaust pipes that run right next to either side of the differential.
We've found the differentials to run quieter, a bit cooler and the lubricant quality to remain more constant in quality over a greater amount of miles/time with the use of 75w/140. That's why we switched.
Hope that helps some and there are more threads on this subject around here that we go into more depth with this topic also.

DTE
I put the D4 ATF in the transmission. It had Royal Purple in it and used to be difficult to get into 1st at a stop light but with the Red-Line this problem has virtually gone away! The problem is now it wants to grind during the 1-2 shift. Is it possible that these synthetics are just too slippery? I talked with Red Line agian and they said that I might try the MTL instead of the D4-ATF. They said that they recommed using that for racing and high load applications. Any thoughts? This is driving me crazy! This is my first Corvette and I love the car but I have never experienced such shifting issues in any car and I have several (6) high performance sports cars including Porsches, Mazdas and a Pantera. Your advise would be appreciated!
Thanks!
Tom
Great advice here on the foum, but why not just use what the manufacturer recommends?
GM is willing to stand behind what they recommend by warranting the car, and will also void a warranty if they find something in the car that they do not recommend.
Now, that's commitment.
Go with the baseline first, then start to add all the colored stuff -- red, purple, or soil.
I've had my 2000 MN6 for six years and almost 75,000 miles. No problems on the differential, transmission, engine, or the clutch. Always used the cheapest that met GM specs.
I saved money, and the car loves it.
Last edited by EHS; Aug 19, 2006 at 06:32 AM.
There. I speak the truth!
We used to use the 75w/90 in our HP differentials, as well as in stock differentials also, but it just wouldn't last for the long term in high performance applications. However, through testing, we found that the higher viscosity 75w/140 was quite a bit more tolerant to thermal break down and remained a bit thicker in high performance applications that generated a lot of driveline heat- from internal friction from the differential itself, heat transfer from the transmission and from radiant heat from the two super-heated exhaust pipes that run right next to either side of the differential.
We've found the differentials to run quieter, a bit cooler and the lubricant quality to remain more constant in quality over a greater amount of miles/time with the use of 75w/140. That's why we switched.
Hope that helps some and there are more threads on this subject around here that we go into more depth with this topic also.

DTE
Not even worth addressing.....
DTE
Your "testing" is better than GM's?
Why wouldn't GM recommend 75w/140 like you do, if you've found that: "the differentials to run quieter, a bit cooler and the lubricant quality to remain more constant in quality over a greater amount of miles/time with the use of 75w/140."




Me too !!!










