When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
6th gear in the MN6 is a .50 internal ratio for gas mileage. I believe even with a 4:10 it will be hard to accelerate in 6th especially when you factor in the aero drag at speeds approaching 200 mph
we shall see....we have a good stretch of almost abandoned highway around here. Still good pavement to.
when I did 180 before I felt major lift on the front, but that was before lowering ans suspension I have done
how much horse does it take to reach 200? if the gearing stays the same on a MN6....
Since this thread is back from the dead, I'll tell you what the handy-dandy program says it would take for a C5 to go 200 MPH ... based solely on the required RWHP to overcome aerodrag and rolling resistance.
200 MPH possible with 453 RWHP. This equates to approx 532 crank HP.
Qualifier - you would have to re-gear to optimize the use of the RWHP. If you didn't re-gear, it would take much more than 453 RWHP to go 200 MPH. 453 would be the least amount of HP needed if gearing, air conditions and traction were absolutely perfect.
Since this thread is back from the dead, I'll tell you what the handy-dandy program says it would take for a C5 to go 200 MPH ... based solely on the required RWHP to overcome aerodrag and rolling resistance.
200 MPH possible with 453 RWHP. This equates to approx 532 crank HP.
Qualifier - you would have to re-gear to optimize the use of the RWHP. If you didn't re-gear, it would take much more than 453 RWHP to go 200 MPH. 453 would be the least amount of HP needed if gearing, air conditions and traction were absolutely perfect.
what program is that? and this is based on a 3.42 gear?
From: Marlton. Increasing performance one speeding ticket at a time! NJ
Not this thread again.......
Wasn't my finest moment.
Originally Posted by NemesisC5
The internal gearing of the MN6 may make 200mph very difficult. A .74 fifth gear in MN6 compared to a .84 fifth gear in MN12 (C5Z tranny). A 3:73 diff gear may help but I would just enjoy your car and not worry about 200mph. I've been past 180mph before and let off because it feels like the windows are going to get sucked out. The C6 is designed to keep this from happening
Since that post I have built a 416 that is around 600 crank HP..
You bet your *** this summer, it WILL be tried.....closed road.......of course
You should be there... stock 3.42s right? All you need to do is to be able to rev it to 6600 RPM in 5th.
edit: I see you have 4.10s so you are in C5Z gearing territory. You might not be able to hit 200 because shifting into 6th is a huge disadvantage. BTW, 5300 RPM in 6th will be 200 MPH.
Since this thread is back from the dead, I'll tell you what the handy-dandy program says it would take for a C5 to go 200 MPH ... based solely on the required RWHP to overcome aerodrag and rolling resistance.
200 MPH possible with 453 RWHP. This equates to approx 532 crank HP.
Qualifier - you would have to re-gear to optimize the use of the RWHP. If you didn't re-gear, it would take much more than 453 RWHP to go 200 MPH. 453 would be the least amount of HP needed if gearing, air conditions and traction were absolutely perfect.
WhooHoo! Thats in my ballpark. Now the question is, where can I try it? Hmmm..... I guess its time to take a drive out to Edwards AFB.
what program is that? and this is based on a 3.42 gear?
No, it's not based on any specific gearing. It's a force calculation of RWHP vs (aerodrag + rolling resistance) to determine how much RWHP is required to achieve a specific speed. The gearing would have to be matched to the power curve of the engine in order to use all available RWHP to achieve the max top speed available. The overall gearing combo of tranny, rear end and tire size would have to be matched-up to make the engine put out max HP at or very close to where the car would limit out due to aerodrag + rolling resistance.
Edit -- see posts # 153 and 154 below for more info.
You should be there... stock 3.42s right? All you need to do is to be able to rev it to 6600 RPM in 5th.
edit: I see you have 4.10s so you are in C5Z gearing territory. You might not be able to hit 200 because shifting into 6th is a huge disadvantage. BTW, 5300 RPM in 6th will be 200 MPH.
Good luck. Don't die.
with the 4.10 I have more agressive gearing than a Z. but a 4.10 might make 6th gear usable. But who knows.
with the 4.10 I have more agressive gearing than a Z. but a 4.10 might make 6th gear usable. But who knows.
I'll try not to die
hows your car doing?
Here's a speadsheet to play with numbers. The factory internal ratios are correct for MN6 and you can change final drive numbers (diff gear). The highlighted boxes are just used as reference for 6700 rpm shift point to see rpm drop between gears.
Here's a speadsheet to play with numbers. The factory internal ratios are correct for MN6 and you can change final drive numbers (diff gear). The highlighted boxes are just used as reference for 6700 rpm shift point to see rpm drop between gears.
Merry Christmas
Good info. It can be seen that 4.10s are too low for a top speed run as it will only hit 165~170 at redline, and 6th gear is still useless due to the huge ratio gap between 5th and 6th.
For a top speed run, the differential should be changed to allow max HP usage from 5th gear.
A 3.42 rear end used in the spreadsheet gives ~205 in 5th gear at 6700 RPM. That's not a bad combo.
A Z06 tranny is actually setup worse for top end in 5th gear, as it's ratio is 0.84, and with a 3.42 rear end will only go ~173 MPH at 6500 RPM. In contrast, the 0.74 5th gear ratio gives ~199 MPH at 6500 RPM.
Good info. It can be seen that 4.10s are too low for a top speed run as it will only hit 165~170 at redline, and 6th gear is still useless due to the huge ratio gap between 5th and 6th.
For a top speed run, the differential should be changed to allow max HP usage from 5th gear.
A 3.42 rear end used in the spreadsheet gives ~205 in 5th gear at 6700 RPM. That's not a bad combo.
A Z06 tranny is actually setup worse for top end in 5th gear, as it's ratio is 0.84, and with a 3.42 rear end will only go ~173 MPH at 6500 RPM. In contrast, the 0.74 5th gear ratio gives ~199 MPH at 6500 RPM.
More good info. Looks like with a Z06 MN12 tranny, a differential ratio around 2.97 would make the best use of 5th gear for a 200 MPH top end run. Again, 6th gear is useless no matter what diff ratio is used.
More good info. Looks like with a Z06 MN12 tranny, a differential ratio around 2.97 would make the best use of 5th gear for a 200 MPH top end run. Again, 6th gear is useless no matter what diff ratio is used.
I'm curious about this one myself. Anyone have some words of wisdom for us A4 folks questing after the 200 patch?
It would be about the same rwhp as the mn6 tranny (when measuring rwhp, drivetrain loss has already been accounted for). However, the 2.73 rear-end ratio would no be suitable because it 4th gear torque multiplication is not enough and 3rd gear top end is to low. I would think 3.42 rear end would be ideal as it allows the car to travel 200 mph at ~6050 rpm. You would need the rwhp to be sufficient at that point (the number being thrown around seems to be 500 rwhp +-25), and a wide enough power band to accommodate whatever rpm 4th gear falls to after switching out of 3rd.
Something else to consider: A tranny cooler. I don't how fast the auto-box will heat up under that load.
Last edited by PaintballaXX; Dec 24, 2008 at 11:37 PM.
with the 4.10 I have more agressive gearing than a Z. but a 4.10 might make 6th gear usable. But who knows.
I'll try not to die
hows your car doing?
The RPM numbers I quoted were actually specifically for your gearing... stock Z06 is somewhere in the 3.80 and 4.00 equivelant range, depending on the gear you are in.
I haven't modded much of anything since the summer cam swap... I've just been swapping out worn out odds and ends (seat bottom leather and foam, broken drivers mirror glass, etc.) Nothing really exciting, heh. Your car looks like it's been coming together well.