When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My buddies C5 w/ prc ported LS6 heads, MS3 237/242 114 lsa, FAST 90, LS2 90mm TB, LG Street headers and tune did 440rwhp 382lbs-ft tq through the stock clutch setup. Why is the torque so low and how could he get the TQ higher???
g5x3 (rumored to be 236 / 242 or close to that)
cold air intake
lg street headers, ghl bullets
stock heads, intake, throttle body, etc.
435.7 & 405.7 (thanks to england green tune)
I don't want to start a war, but the first thing i would look at if that were my car is the cylinder heads and who ported them. That stuff is an art/science and there are only a couple of heads i would consider and only a couple people I would let change the port work.
Also the tune. My old tuner had it at around 426/386, EG managed to up those numbers a bit.
Also, if he has 410 gears or something like that, he will show different dyno numbers.
My buddies C5 w/ prc ported LS6 heads, MS3 237/242 114 lsa, FAST 90, LS2 90mm TB, LG Street headers and tune did 440rwhp 382lbs-ft tq through the stock clutch setup. Why is the torque so low and how could he get the TQ higher???
Cam is too big. Designed for high rpm use not low rpm torque
From: You know your drunk when you swerve to miss the tree then you realize its your air freshener! Covington Ga
I have the same cam in mine but stock heads (241) and stock LS6 intake manifold and protted TB 412RWHP and I think 366RWTQ. I think you need a re-tune.
I have the same cam in mine but stock heads (241) and stock LS6 intake manifold and protted TB 412RWHP and I think 366RWTQ. I think you need a re-tune.
When I just had LTs (LG streets), CAI (V-ram) and tune on my '02 C5 w/stock 241heads, stock LS6 intake and stock LS1 cam, I made 351rwhp and 365rwtq. Your torque numbers are low too w/ the MS3. I spoke with Patrick G from Thunder Racing and he said that the MS3 loves high compression. 10:5 comp ratio is too low for this cam and it has a horrible DCR. He said it's an RPM cam and not suited for torque and that it was extremely weak in the low/mid range.
Last edited by 11sec_C5Z51; Oct 28, 2009 at 09:48 AM.
St. Jude Donor '03-'04-'05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13
Originally Posted by ALVETTE00
Anthony, can you elaborate on point #3. I've always thought my #'s were on the low side and maybe this is why? See Sig for mods.
Thanks
Advancing or retarding the camshaft can move the power band around. If you retard the cam it should move the power band up in the RPM range, conversely retarding it would move it back down.
Of course this is all going to play with how the cam is setup and your over all combo.
Advancing or retarding the camshaft can move the power band around. If you retard the cam it should move the power band up in the RPM range, conversely retarding it would move it back down.
Of course this is all going to play with how the cam is setup and your over all combo.
Thanks...maybe a combo of the converter being unlocked, A4 loss and stingy dyno are the cause of my percieved low #'s.
Its an MN6 so there isn't a torque converter issue. A stingy dyno would report everything low. The HP is computed based on the TQ, so everything would be low. Now, if the HP was low too, the dyno could be considered stingy, but that is a pretty big spread between HP and TQ.
Its an MN6 so there isn't a torque converter issue. A stingy dyno would report everything low. The HP is computed based on the TQ, so everything would be low. Now, if the HP was low too, the dyno could be considered stingy, but that is a pretty big spread between HP and TQ.
FYI...was referring to my personal sidebar...not the orig post!