Keyless Start
What happens if you leave the FOB in the car and walk away, can someone else get in your car or does the car let you know?
I still would like to know the reason GM picked reverse to turn off the manual trans power. It it more natural for a person to put the car in 1st after shutting down the engine because it usually is in 1st at that time.



What is the improvement of the push button over the key?
Not having to re-key your ignition and doors when one or the other wears out?
Integration with the vehicle's security system?
Computer controlled starts, so the iginition isn't activated for too short or long a time?
Can't start the car when it's already started?
Shall I continue?




The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Last edited by savewave; Aug 20, 2004 at 12:04 PM. Reason: Inappropriate content




Try making sure you're right before you get snotty and wind up looking foolish.
Unless you honestly believe that the key fob somehow magically shrinks to fit into the keyhole above the rear license plate.
I could argue power windows are bad because I was so used to rotating the window lever that I don't think I'll ever get used to pushing a button down.

Guy 1: Power windows? Bah, why do we need something else, it's different from how I used to operate my old windows!
Guy 2: It's not that big a change. There's very little habit adjustment on your part.
Guy 1: Eh, I'm so used to rolling 'em up I'll just never adjust!
Guy 2: But, it's not going to be that hard to adjust...
Guy 1: Bah Humbug.
Replace power windows with the R-instead-of-1st issue and I think it's the same thing. It's also the same because the difference in action is so small. How hard is it to put it in R instead of 1st? It isn't. (You'll even be hassled by beeps and DIC warnings if you manage to forget.) How hard is it to push a button instead of spin a lever. It isn't.
Your point, however, is a tangent to mine. The CD example got the issue muddled, so that was a bad analogy on my part. I'm not saying R-instead-of-1st is superior technologically. I'm simply saying having to change an old habit is silly as a reason to not like it, especially considering the fact that plenty of people on here already were pro-reverse to begin with. It's not a huge paradigm shift.
And it's through all that jibber-jabber I just did that I don't have to point out a better example.
But hopefully I made my point clearer.
Last edited by Lazerwolfe; Aug 13, 2004 at 12:55 PM.
Whether those of us who actively "drive" our cars agree with it or not, you just have to believe that such passive arming features for cars are going to be near universal in the near future. "Civilian" consumers look on such things as being hi-tech (like the latest geekazoid PDA accessory) and, as such, very desirable. I suspect the above assertion about cost is valid as well. If so, then you KNOW Detroit will be on it like a coat of paint in their neverending quest to cut costs.
As many others have said, I really don't see the use of this fob to be a big deal. You get used to things pretty quickly. When I first got my Audi S4, I found the trip computer pretty mystifying. Now it is almost comically simple compared to all of the programmable options that our C6's will have. But we'll get used to all of them too.

Not having to re-key your ignition and doors when one or the other wears out?
Integration with the vehicle's security system?
Computer controlled starts, so the iginition isn't activated for too short or long a time?
Can't start the car when it's already started?
Shall I continue?
Try making sure you're right before you get snotty and wind up looking foolish.
Unless you honestly believe that the key fob somehow magically shrinks to fit into the keyhole above the rear license plate.



And I never called you any names. I simply pointed out how rude you were.
















