I Need Traction Baaaaad !!!!!!!!


How things have changed.
John
The issue I have is the thought process thinking any single device is a substitute for basic driving skill.
d48mclain
Excuse me.... but a cheaper approach is to learn how to dive and not let your eyes be bigger than your belly when selecting your combo. It's called reflexes, talent, experience and judgment. I'm not against traction control at all but if you want to hang with the big dogs, you need to act like a big dog and not rely upon a crutch to help ya walk.
Dude quit being a hater. You seem like you are knowledgeable person from reading some of your posts but the way you come off is primitive and rude .
I'm definitely not the only one who thinks that on CF by this thread.
I read this whole thing. Boy was Tony Mamo with AFR and others pissed at you and rightfully so. I don't see your apology at the end of the thread when an independent shop proved the flow of the 195's matched their claims. Just 3 words after talking all that B.S. and you vanish.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...1692831&page=6 Go to post 109 for a brief .
I spent my OWN money on a promising great product and am doing a review for everybody to observe, learn on and decide for themselves if it's right for them, WTF is wrong with that Mr. know it all had it all ?
It's used on Many Track Vipers ( purchased it from woodhouse Viper) and Corvettes including LG motorsports and Stoptech racing. It also comes stock on Lotus and Aston martin cars. The new 650hp SS vette will have a new state of the art racing traction control system.
WTF are you trying to say ,everybody above that uses a traction control device is an inferior driver and needs it or they're cheatin?
I'm sure there were people like you shooting their mouth off back when power steering and power brakes were introduced into racing saying that's cheating .
If I thought like you,
I would put my Old school DFI computer in my C6 that takes about 8 hours to fine tune in DOS mode. Then in your eyes I can say I'm a better tuner because it's more challenging .
I must be using a crutch now tuning my cars new 32bit PCM in Windows .
It's called Technology. e.g.
Microwave
electric toothbrush
intermittent wipers
run flat tires
I don't have a problem with your criticism of a product I have or am talking about. You got a little personal pal.
Lay off,
.
.
.
.
Last edited by C6dude; Sep 19, 2007 at 12:51 PM.
Dude quit being a hater. You seem like you are knowledgeable person from reading some of your posts but the way you come off is primitive and rude .
I'm definitely not the only one who thinks that on CF by this thread.
I read this whole thing. Boy was Tony Mamo with AFR and others pissed at you and rightfully so. I don't see your apology at the end of the thread when an independent shop proved the flow of the 195's matched their claims. Just 3 words after talking all that B.S. and you vanish.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...1692831&page=6 Go to post 109 for a brief .
I spent my OWN money on a promising great product and am doing a review for everybody to observe, learn on and decide for themselves if it's right for them, WTF is wrong with that Mr. know it all had it all ?
It's used on Many Track Vipers ( purchased it from woodhouse Viper) and Corvettes including LG motorsports. It also comes stock on Lotus and Aston martin cars. The new 650hp SS vette has some kind of new state of the art racing traction control system.
WTF are you trying to say ,everybody above that uses a traction control device is an inferior driver and needs it or they're cheating?
I'm sure there were people like you shooting their mouth off back when power steering and power brakes were introduced into racing saying that's cheating .
If I thought like you,
I would put my Old school DFI computer in my C6 that takes 8 hours to tune in DOS mode. Then in your eyes I can say I'm a better tuner because it's more challenging .
I must be using a crutch now tuning my new 32bit PCM in Windows .
It's called Technology. e.g.
Microwave
electric toothbrush
intermittent wipers
I don't have a problem with your criticism of a product I have or am talking about. You got a little personal pal.
Lay off,
.
.
.
.
They have those?
keep up the great work and please keep us posted on the results of this setup
also, about the setup, so would the racelogic version that cuts coil/spark be a safer deal than the cut injector pulse? (non-injected/carb product version)
e.g. wouldn't cutting injector pulse be like running lean? and therefore cutting the spark would be running really rich? e.g. less chance of engine damage?
also, what version of the racelogic did you end up with? RLTC8DIA?? RLTC8ALD + TCDIA? RLTC8ALD + TCDIA + TCCLUSHIFT? RLTC8DIA + parts from lotus 2-11??!?!?
thanks for the time
fafnir
Hey fafnir,
No problem bro, I share anything I think is worth while and this one might save someones A$$ some day
I purchased the RLTC8DIA unit with launch control .
I just ordered another one for one of my customers that I'm building a 1250HP LS7 Warhawk powered 2008 Z06.
I will probably have that one dialed in before mine with my work load at the moment.
I WILL be back to this thread with results from one of them I promise.
Being an engine builder/tuner my thoughts were the same
Here's their quotes about the lean issue you brought up:
" The idea of cutting fuel to an engine sets alarm bells ringing in engine builders, as they all know of the potential disaster of a high revving race engine running lean. Running in a lean combustion mode will elevate in-cylinder temperatures very rapidly, the denser the air/fuel charge, the more heat the lean burn can generate. Therefore it is vital that a fuel cut system will not cause a lean burn.
"The simplest way of preventing a lean burn is to remove more than 50% of the fuel from the pulsed delivery. A mixture will only ignite if the air/fuel ratio is within a tightly defined window, look at the efforts being put into making lean burn engines fire on very low air/fuel ratios (1:20 or more). Removing more than 50% of the fuel will cause an air fuel ratio of over 1:25 and will result in a complete miss-fire, with the unburned fuel passing out through the exhaust valve. Even if a high air/fuel ratio did manage to ignite, the energy available from the amount of petrol injected wouldn't be enough to elevate temperatures significantly. Of course the ideal system will remove 100% of the pulsed fuel delivery, allowing the cylinder to take a gulp of fresh air, and the in-cylinder temperature would remain virtually unaffected. Racelogic Traction Control operates in this manner - the complete injector pulse is removed so no possibility of lean burn can exist."
"Prolonged fuel cut on one particular cylinder would cause scavenging of the petrol lining, the inlet tracts, and when the next full fuel pulse arrived, it would be partially reduced in quantity by the re-wetting of these tracts. Therefore it is often important to manage a rotation of the cylinder cutting to prevent this situation from occurring.".
For those who feel their throttle foot has better control on a 1000hp especially at 100MPH read on:
"The fastest human reaction to a sense stimulus is 1/10th of a second, and the fastest acting throttle reacts in around the same time. This means there is a 2/10ths of a second lag between the wheel reaching a critical slip level, and the driver being able to change the amount of power being applied.
Many factors affect the ideal level of slip, wet / dry conditions, speed of the vehicle, lateral g-force (cornering), tire compound, tire pressures etc. Ideally the driver should be able to dial in a base level of slip that takes into account weather and tires, and the system should adjust automatically for speed of the vehicle and lateral g-force.
When cornering, the system should reduce the amount of slip available, to prevent lateral slip from occurring, and vary this amount depending on the speed of the vehicle. At high speed, low grip situations, this slip should be around 1-2% to maintain forward momentum, and at low speed high grip situations, this can be much higher."
.
.
.
Perry
.
.
.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
. sounds fine and dandy but distance plays a factor
. maybe one day at an event in the states or if i run into a quagmire (dilemma) that i can not solve. dont get me wrong the experience would be great.
njm




This thing is actually letting you sample the tire traction and adds power up to your max foot position commanded amount unlike our traction control that simply cuts the throttle in bad conditions. It rides that line of breaking traction regardless of how much foot pressure you give it.

I hope it works out for you. But at $3400+ installed, I think I'll just spin 'em instead. But then I'm not at 1000rwhp. Good luck.
Last edited by k0bun; Jan 26, 2008 at 11:13 PM.
Am I going to have to get it installed and beat you to the feedback?

My N/A 580rwhp produces alot of wheel spin accelerating out of turns. Think this may be a wise investment.





My previous car had launch control and it worked amazingly well; CONSISTENT sub 1.6 second 60ft times on street tires





