When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: DFW This user does not support or recommend the product or service displayed in the ad to the right
Originally Posted by petrasb
After I lowered the screws on mine, I remove the front lower lip that drags on everything, could this be part of the reasone for the lightness at 160+?
My 07 Z51 seems a little "light" in the rear when going 120 + ... it's still stable but I think I know what you're talking about.. I was planning on GM full race spoiler anyway so I will get that on and see what happens and report back..
I took the car in my avatar on the autobahn in France headed toward Switzerland There is no speed limit on that section. My friend had his ''04 Z06 and we played follow the leader for a couple of hundred km. The '04 06 front fenders would swell above 150 due to the air pressure on the front brake vents, making the front end light between 150MPH and 175MPH. The '05 Z51 was rock stable all the way to 175MPH. By the way, we did get passed by a red Lambo that had to be over 200MPH.
I took the car in my avatar on the autobahn in France headed toward Switzerland There is no speed limit on that section. My friend had his ''04 Z06 and we played follow the leader for a couple of hundred km. The '04 06 front fenders would swell above 150 due to the air pressure on the front brake vents, making the front end light between 150MPH and 175MPH. The '05 Z51 was rock stable all the way to 175MPH. By the way, we did get passed by a red Lambo that had to be over 200MPH.
Many people say the c5Z front is light at speed that makes sence
From: Brooklyn New York The DVL and the chicken sleep with the fishes....
St. Jude Donor '08
I agree that the my C5's FELT more stable at speed compared to my C6 z51 - then I drove my car back to back with a c5 and the c6 was clearly more stable , IMHO . I guess the grass always seems greener on the other side.....
Get the alignment setup and it should be rock solid.
I agree. Before I did the mods on mine it would wander at 130 plus.
After power, suspension, alignment and brake upgrades (see my sig) it is rock solid up to red line in 4th gear. Of course it gets there so fast that the forward momentum could help keep it stable.
Guys/gals, I'm looking for feedback on how your car handles basically stock. My old 04Z seemed to get more stable at high speeds (and improved with lowering); the faster it went, the more stable it felt.
This car is different (07 Coupe Z51.) At higher speeds the rear end feels like it's walking around on me, and makes me rather uncomfortable. It's like too much oversteer. Dealer again says "normal" and to upgrade the rear spoiler. I'm not buying that. Also says alignment is good (had them check most obvious first.)
Ideas?
I have the same car as you (07 z51 coupe), and had the same feeling at high speed. My car was floating at high speed corners (worse with bumps) and I experimented bump steer, I suppose due to a soft springs stock setup and a soft shock rebound damping. At the end I decided to install the pfadt coilovers. This floating feeling and bump steer are over. The rear is now planted in turns. Now it's a totally different car. I'm so confident with the feedback of the car, that it seems to me I'm going slower than before. In my opinion adding a rear spoiler will add air drag and increase mass on the rear wheels, so if you don't change spring rates you will get things worse. (more mass and equal spring rates = softer spring rates)
After I lowered the screws on mine, I remove the front lower lip that drags on everything, could this be part of the reasone for the lightness at 160+?
If you take out the front lower lip, more air will flow under the car and this will lift the rear.
My 07 Z51 seems a little "light" in the rear when going 120 + ... it's still stable but I think I know what you're talking about.. I was planning on GM full race spoiler anyway so I will get that on and see what happens and report back..
So what would be the next upgrade from a Z51 spring, a Z06 spring? I'm going to try and play with the alignment settings, but I've got to start over since the dealer didn't print out the current specs after they supposedly aligned it. Seems to me my Z06 had a similar feel till I got the alignment right, but not NEAR this bad. The car wants to oversteer at high speed. Wondering if I shouldn't just lower it more, but that's going to involve cutting the pucks.....not a big deal to me (did it on the last car) but was trying to avoid the clearance issues (and the dealer complaints about having to work on it.) Appreciate everyone's input.
One of the most relevant characteristics of a spring is the spring stiffness, which is the force necessary to compress the spring for example 1 inch. If we put any weight on a spring we'll get an oscillation at some rate. This oscillation is the imporant characteristic for cars, it is measured on cycles per second. This oscillation depends on spring stiffness and also on the weight of the car. If you have a slow ratio your car will be more confortable, and if you have a higher ratio it will react quicker to bumps and will become less confortable.
So if we change spring stiffnes or change the sprung weight of the car, we will change the oscillation rate. To increase the stiffness of the spring has the same effect than reducing the mass of the car: we will increase the oscillation rate of the system. If you make your car lighter and do not change springs, your car will react as a car with stiffer springs. Of course the opposite is also true, if you increase the mass of your car and don't change spring stiffness, your car will react as a car with softer springs.
I've driven 150+ for about 1/2 hour. 2005 Vert.
Car as solid as a rock. You do need both hands on the wheel, but it drives just fine.
Wife was riding with me, air running and XM playing...
I was in a small group of other Corvettes (7 I think), we were in a line, was kinda fun.
Same trip, 125-ish on Cruise Control for about 45 min.
I live in Nevada, we have a lot of long, straight, smooth roads with NO TRAFFIC.
One of the most relevant characteristics of a spring is the spring stiffness, which is the force necessary to compress the spring for example 1 inch. If we put any weight on a spring we'll get an oscillation at some rate. This oscillation is the imporant characteristic for cars, it is measured on cycles per second. This oscillation depends on spring stiffness and also on the weight of the car. If you have a slow ratio your car will be more confortable, and if you have a higher ratio it will react quicker to bumps and will become less confortable.
So if we change spring stiffnes or change the sprung weight of the car, we will change the oscillation rate. To increase the stiffness of the spring has the same effect than reducing the mass of the car: we will increase the oscillation rate of the system. If you make your car lighter and do not change springs, your car will react as a car with stiffer springs. Of course the opposite is also true, if you increase the mass of your car and don't change spring stiffness, your car will react as a car with softer springs.
I don't think so.
Doesn't increasing or decreasing the mass of the car not alter the spring (or wheel) rates? I thought it simply changes the pre-load, and that results in changing ride height.
Changing wheel or suspensiom mass will change the oscillation rate of the suspension, though.
Last edited by davekp78; Jul 18, 2007 at 04:49 PM.
So what would be the next upgrade from a Z51 spring, a Z06 spring? I'm going to try and play with the alignment settings, but I've got to start over since the dealer didn't print out the current specs after they supposedly aligned it. Seems to me my Z06 had a similar feel till I got the alignment right, but not NEAR this bad. The car wants to oversteer at high speed. Wondering if I shouldn't just lower it more, but that's going to involve cutting the pucks.....not a big deal to me (did it on the last car) but was trying to avoid the clearance issues (and the dealer complaints about having to work on it.) Appreciate everyone's input.
I'm no expert but I've had a very experienced C6 racer help setup my car for running on a road course. He essentially levels the car (an involved process but not difficult) and he runs 1-2 lb higher air pressure in the front tires.
I don't think so.
Doesn't increasing or decreasing the mass of the car not alter the spring (or wheel) rates? I thought it simply changes the pre-load, and that results in changing ride height.
Changing wheel or suspensiom mass will change the oscillation rate of the suspension, though.
I agree with you. Changing mass does not alter spring rates, but changes the oscillation rate, that is what really matters and what you really feel. What I tried to say is: if you alter weight, this is like having a car with the previous weight and different spring rates.