C6 1/4 Mile Performance Challenge

Can someone with an LS2 C6 not do weight reduction and still be on the list?
As long as it's in a C6 I could care less.
Last edited by FloydSummerOf68; Jan 24, 2011 at 02:44 PM.

I wouldn't have a problem with that.
Can someone with an LS2 C6 not do weight reduction and still be on the list?
As long as it's in a C6 I could care less.






Is it just because I have a west coast car in the 10's or that you can't find anyone else with my particular combination of mods and tune for comparison?
Of course, it's only the LS2 guys that seem to have that problem.
I've provided far more information about my car, the mods, the race conditions, and other aspects than anyone else on this list. I've followed the posted rules that even require looking at a different website to find definitions and find nothing that would change anything.
I think you guys are going to have to resort to different tactics if your intentions are to discredit the results.
Maybe try things like Sacramento fog contains nitromethane or alien beings provided dilithium crystals. 


It's all good.I think the 2925 weight says it all. Theofel's car weighs 3250 IIRC. That right there is the difference. Mike knows he could make his car lighter - but it's his street car and he's happy with it. It does look great.

Is it just because I have a west coast car in the 10's or that you can't find anyone else with my particular combination of mods and tune for comparison?
Of course, it's only the LS2 guys that seem to have that problem.
I've provided far more information about my car, the mods, the race conditions, and other aspects than anyone else on this list. I've followed the posted rules that even require looking at a different website to find definitions and find nothing that would change anything.
I think you guys are going to have to resort to different tactics if your intentions are to discredit the results.
Maybe try things like Sacramento fog contains nitromethane or alien beings provided dilithium crystals. 


I crunched the numbers and there is a problem with your timeslip.
1. As I pointed out the 102 mph is very high for your horsepower regardless of the converter.
2. your two slips at Speedworld are nearly identical which gives a good baseline. The problem is that your incremental time from the 660' to 1000' is nearly identical for all three passes. (2.095, 2.097, and 2.097) your pass at Sacramento would need to be incrementally faster since your 1/8 and 1/4 mile trap speeds are greater.
3.your Sacramento pass picked up about 0.16 from the 60' to the 1/8, 0.00 from 660' to 1000', and 0.10 from 1000' to the 1/4. Something is off. Either there is a timing issue between the two tracks or something else is going on. maybe a little nitrous after the 60 ft to the 330 giving a little kick in the 1/8 at both tracks
so i have way more mods, a 1.41 60 ft 10.62 et and i dont hit 102, also that great east coast atco air, and of course weight reduction, if he was 2925, i was lighter
If the 102 was real, I think his 1/8 ET would be lower.
And I hate to be harping on the guy, he does his own work and drives many miles to get the slip. I have to respect those facts.
If the 102 was real, I think his 1/8 ET would be lower.
And I hate to be harping on the guy, he does his own work and drives many miles to get the slip. I have to respect those facts.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts








A 325# weight difference and 500+ feet DA can easily account for the ET difference and still leave some leftover for his extra HP. If Mike dropped to equal weight and comparable DA, he'd easily gain .4 to run in the mid 10's. But then he'd be the target of the non-believers.

If the 102 was real, I think his 1/8 ET would be lower.
And I hate to be harping on the guy, he does his own work and drives many miles to get the slip. I have to respect those facts.
The MPH didn't tie out in the 1/4. If he would've went faster then it would have made sense, but he went slower than my mph in the 1/4?

Christopher had his buddies LS2 Cammed, geared, stalled, bolt ons LS2 there and the best he could muster up was a 10.85@125+mph. Now are you gonna tell me that Christopher's friend with an all out LS2 with more power is going to go slower on the same day as this guy? Christopher's jaw must have been hanging when he seen HOXXOX go faster since I believe Christopher has been helping, working, advising his buddies C6 LS2 Vette. Remember, if HOXXOX had great air, so did Christopher's friend.
A 325# weight difference and 500+ feet DA can easily account for the ET difference and still leave some leftover for his extra HP. If Mike dropped to equal weight and comparable DA, he'd easily gain .4 to run in the mid 10's. But then he'd be the target of the non-believers. 





A 325# weight difference and 500+ feet DA can easily account for the ET difference and still leave some leftover for his extra HP. If Mike dropped to equal weight and comparable DA, he'd easily gain .4 to run in the mid 10's. But then he'd be the target of the non-believers. 
Last edited by dennis50nj; Jan 24, 2011 at 04:30 PM.





The MPH didn't tie out in the 1/4. If he would've went faster then it would have made sense, but he went slower than my mph in the 1/4?

Christopher had his buddies LS2 Cammed, geared, stalled, bolt ons LS2 there and the best he could muster up was a 10.85@125+mph. Now are you gonna tell me that Christopher's friend with an all out LS2 with more power is going to go slower on the same day as this guy? Christopher's jaw must have been hanging when he seen HOXXOX go faster since I believe Christopher has been helping, working, advising his buddies C6 LS2 Vette. Remember, if HOXXOX had great air, so did Christopher's friend.

Now, wanna try explaining why the third Arizona car with no changes after running 11.11 two weeks earlier at Speedworld could only manage a 11.20 in CA?









