When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does make you wonder. If GM can release all those magical numbers to the SAE, why can't they release them to the general public(you know, the one's that will actually buy the car). I wonder how many C7's the SAE will buy, or for that matter, how many C7's will be purchased by SAE members? then I wonder how many C7's will be purchased by the general public, you know, the ones that are not SAE members.
The graph has the power curves of the LT1 and LS3 superimposed, the grid is in 1000's of RPM and 10KW power increments .. so not exactly precise but close.
The exhaust system and octane used was not specified.
GM should have info soon for public consumption; paper is scheduled for next week; but SAE published early.
I know your loving this right now, thinking of all the fanatics sitting behind their computer screen with blood shot, over-dialated eyes as they rip their hair out.
Does make you wonder. If GM can release all those magical numbers to the SAE, why can't they release them to the general public(you know, the one's that will actually buy the car). I wonder how many C7's the SAE will buy, or for that matter, how many C7's will be purchased by SAE members? then I wonder how many C7's will be purchased by the general public, you know, the ones that are not SAE members.
GM didn't release anything to SAE, SAE was there watching.
To tout power and torque ratings as "SAE-certified," engine manufacturers must have an SAE qualified witness watch over the entire testing procedure to ensure that it is conducted in conformity to SAE standard J1349. Third-party witnessing is the main provision of J2723. An existing SAE standard, J1349, spells out how the actual testing is to be done. J1349 was updated last year to eliminate some ambiguities that allowed engine makers to cite power and torque ratings higher than the engine's actual capabilities.
The graph has the power curves of the LT1 and LS3 superimposed, the grid is in 1000's of RPM and 10KW power increments .. so not exactly precise but close.
The exhaust system and octane used was not specified.
GM should have info soon for public consumption; paper is scheduled for next week; but SAE published early.
Cheers
Are those SAE certified numbers that will be attached to every C7 made?
Does make you wonder. If GM can release all those magical numbers to the SAE, why can't they release them to the general public(you know, the one's that will actually buy the car). I wonder how many C7's the SAE will buy, or for that matter, how many C7's will be purchased by SAE members? then I wonder how many C7's will be purchased by the general public, you know, the ones that are not SAE members.
I'd venture to guess that the SAE probably has all of GM Powertrain's numbers before we see them just due to the certification process.
I know your loving this right now, thinking of all the fanatics sitting behind their computer screen with blood shot, over-dialated eyes as they rip their hair out.
GM didn't release anything to SAE, SAE was there watching.
To tout power and torque ratings as "SAE-certified," engine manufacturers must have an SAE qualified witness watch over the entire testing procedure to ensure that it is conducted in conformity to SAE standard J1349. Third-party witnessing is the main provision of J2723. An existing SAE standard, J1349, spells out how the actual testing is to be done. J1349 was updated last year to eliminate some ambiguities that allowed engine makers to cite power and torque ratings higher than the engine's actual capabilities.
I know how the SAE certification is done. Known about since around 2005.
I didn't ask how the certification was done. I asked if the magical numbers the OP is saying appears in the SAE paper were SAE certified numbers(the numbers that will be advertised by GM).
I still haven't seen an answer to my question about the 7200 RPM horsepower readings that are supposed to be mentioned in the SAE paper. I know from the dyno graph that GM has released for the C7's LT1, that the redline is 6500 and the horsepower starts dropping at 5900 RPM and that the LT1's torque drops off faster than the LS3's(which indicates that the engine is not going to put out magical horsepower numbers at high RPMs, above the LS3's).
I'd venture to guess that the SAE probably has all of GM Powertrain's numbers before we see them just due to the certification process.
The third party witness is not an employee of the SAE nor the auto manufacturer. Thus no guarantee that the SAE will know what the certified numbers are if GM doesn't want the SAE to know at that moment in time.
The witness watches the dyno pulls at the manufacturer's location, on the manufactures dyno cells, not a SAE dyno(which I doubt that they have) or the third party's dyno..
The third party witness is there to make sure the SAE protocol is adhered to and signs off if it was.
Paper is DRM'ed had to give them my address and CC info for purchase...
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROTECTED BY U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT.
It may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, distributed or transmitted, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means.
Downloaded from SAE International by Gary xxxx, Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:51:50 AM
SAE is real picky about this..
Thanks. I figured that might be the case, but figured I'd ask anyway.
Thanks for sharing the info, 470hp sounds about right. Not the pie in the sky 500hp number folks were praying for, but a healthy bump above the LS3 to satisfy all of the 'ONLY 15HP?!?!' complainers.
I know how the SAE certification is done. Known about since around 2005.
I didn't ask how the certification was done. I asked if the magical numbers the OP is saying appears in the SAE paper were SAE certified numbers(the numbers that will be advertised by GM).
I still haven't seen an answer to my question about the 7200 RPM horsepower readings that are supposed to be mentioned in the SAE paper. I know from the dyno graph that GM has released for the C7's LT1, that the redline is 6500 and the horsepower starts dropping at 5900 RPM and that the LT1's torque drops off faster than the LS3's(which indicates that the engine is not going to put out magical horsepower numbers at high RPMs, above the LS3's).
You could pay the $24 and read it, You know, it's possible GM Was not telling the whole story with that graph.
Why do you guys keep saying 470 hp? 35 over the LS3 would be 465 hp, unless he was saying 35 over the LS3 with NPP.
I'd be ok with 470, though. 465, though, (and I know I'm splitting hairs here) just still seems a tad low to me on paper. Gotta draw the line somewhere, heh. But what will be more valuable are real performance specs (0-60, 1/4, skidpad, 'ring times, etc).
Joes,
If you want to see it buy the $24 paper. He can't show the curves due to copy wright laws.
He "quoted" part of the paper. Why can't he quote, in his own words, the part that tells about the 7200 RPM and so forth. I'm not asking that he take a snapshot and then post that snapshot.
Remember when you were in school and the teacher made you read a book(that was copyrighted) and then write a book review. Did the teacher make you break the law by writing the book review? Did you take the book to your copier, run 370 pages of copies and turn that in as book report?
He "quoted" part of the paper. Why can't he quote, in his own words, the part that tells about the 7200 RPM and so forth. I'm not asking that he take a snapshot and then post that snapshot.
Remember when you were in school and the teacher made you read a book(that was copyrighted) and then write a book review. Did the teacher make you break the law by writing the book review?
He expalined the chart to you, yet you contiune to question the validity of what he is saying. If you do not belive what he is typing then I emplore you to download the paper and read it for your self.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.