When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Second vette has been great, but with all of these horror stories popping up sounding like my first car I'm starting to get nervous Especially since I just had the oil changed a few hundred miles ago! I don't want to go through that again!
Wow. 3 posters in this thread already with engines down with bearing damage.
Not sure what is going on with this issue. Hopefully is isolated and general to the whole fleet. A bit disturbing.
OP, DCBE and Frank - sorry you guys have to go through this. Any concrete info you learn on cause, please post it.
I will update when I find out what caused it, if they will tell me. If it was metal left in the motor the filter should catch it. Unless it was excessive then the filter goes into bypass mode. I was a quality engineer and I believe that any factory would have strict procedures for keeping the internals clean during assembly. But that is speculation since I have not worked at a GM plant. I have been through many oil and air filter plants though.
Second vette has been great, but with all of these horror stories popping up sounding like my first car I'm starting to get nervous Especially since I just had the oil changed a few hundred miles ago! I don't want to go through that again!
Glad to hear they took care of you. Glad to hear your new one is well. I hope I get the same help. I really loved my car.
Lemon laws don't mandate a new car for one failure. There are conditions attached about repeat failures, repeated attempts at repair, etc. One failure and repair won't invoke the lemon law.
You can. There's a thread here that was started a few days ago about this and Chevrolet Customer Service posted a reply stating unequivocally that the four free oil changes in the first two years can be done at any time, regardless of what the DIC says. See post #26 in this thread: https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...l-changes.html
I believe you are correct on the lemon laws. I am not asking for moon. I just want some help on a new one. I do not believe this one will ever be right again.
I'd ask them to replace the oil pump now in addition to everything else. If the metal particles were going through the pump, it could have already been damaged.
From: Detroit area and Nashville area What day is it? Between MI & TN
I wonder what the split is between 2014 v 2015. Base v Z51.
When I read all the e-diff issues with the 2014, I almost didn't order a Z51 but in the end ordered a 2015 Z51. Now, with all the engine issues, hummmm. I stopped my 2014 order and waited for a 2015, I hope going forward with a vette at all will not be a mistake.
BMW (335's) had a lot of issues and I went through some of that. For my first vette, I just want it to be a great experience.
I believe you are correct on the lemon laws. I am not asking for moon. I just want some help on a new one. I do not believe this one will ever be right again.
I understand your frustration, but why would it "never be right again?" It's not rocket science to rebuild or replace an engine. No carmaker, GM included, will simply replace entire cars due to warranty repairs because the owner doesn't want a repaired car. That's not even a reasonable request IMO.
This thread and others on internal engine damage is really making me rethink ordering a C7. Right now I have a C5 and a hot rod. The rod is for sale and when it goes, we were planning on trading the C5 and ordering with my families GM discount. I've been lurking on C7 site for few months now to get a read on issues, likes, dislikes
Now. . .I'm thinking maybe waiting till '16 model year, by then, hopefully, the reason for these engine issues, vert top up/down problems, paint, etc will be corrected. Granted this a very small sampling of issues vs the thousands of C7's with no problems, but jesh. . .these threads by you guys are scaring me.
Last edited by jdsaengine; Sep 12, 2014 at 11:09 AM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
I'd ask them to replace the oil pump now in addition to everything else. If the metal particles were going through the pump, it could have already been damaged.
My bet is they are going to give him a complete engine, they usually are heads to oil pan.
All the dealer installs is the intake and external pieces not involved in the failure, if it's a Z51 they will probably give him the oilier also.
If the insurance company totals the car he could get a car, but I wouldn't count on that happening.
Getting a new engine from Chevy under warranty should not affect resale or trade-in value at all. I'm with everyone else here though, ask for a complete engine, not a dealership rebuild.
Getting a new engine from Chevy under warranty should not affect resale or trade-in value at all. I'm with everyone else here though, ask for a complete engine, not a dealership rebuild.
It sure wont be all original after the swap. That does matter in some circles.
It sure wont be all original after the swap. That does matter in some circles.
For a pristine museum show-piece, sure, but definitely not for trade-in or the majority of used car buyers out there. I'd be concerned over a rebuild, but not a new engine.
I'm bringing over this information that I posted yesterday in the Tech/Performance section. I feel it is relevant to this thread as well.
Ed
I'm way more concerned about the thrust bearing failures that we're seeing.
The new 180 degree thrust bearing on number 3 main is a big concern for me.
Does anyone have insight as to why they made the switch from a 360 degree bearing that has been the industry standard for 100 years: with a history of very few failures for 100,000 mile engines .
This new bearing looks like a conventional main thrust bearing, but only has the thrust flanges on the half that is in the block. the #3 main bearing that resides in the cap does not have a flange to resist the thrust. This reduces the thrust bearing surface by 50%.
Any for & aft movement of the crankshaft will place stress on the connecting rods that can result in broken rods that will poke a hole in the block, similar to the few blown engines that have been reported here.
This reduced thrust surface absorption area can also account for the engine replacements due to improper installation of the torque tube causing damage to the thrust bearing.
I'm looking for a reasonable explanation for the switch to this 180 degree bearing style. All I can come up with is reduced friction to free up horsepower, but it's coming with a reliability price tag.
I want to add that the stress I mentioned on the connecting rods also applies to the pistons. This can result in scuffed piston skirts, and a probability of scored cylinder walls.
It is just my opinion, but I feel this foreign metal being claimed as coming from defective oil filters is in reality pieces from the damaged Thrust bearing.
I really hope this has been resolved before my car comes in. I thought the early problems had been fixed, but now as more miles are put on this pops up.
Again: just my opinion, but in no way would I feel the problem was fixed by replacing bearings if they are replaced with a similar design.
I know that I keep saying, "My opinion," but this is a forum to present ones ideas for discussion. Disagree with me if you do, but lets not allow it to go down the wrong path. No name calling please; just a rational discussion. I see too much of that here.
It will be curious to see what the 'real' fault is. 2014 saw ~40,000 C7's built, and unfortunately for some, there have been serious problems. I guess it's not unrealistic to expect some issues, however they may be. I have friends with other brands of cars (MBZ, BMW) who have had serious issues and have the manufacturers buy back the cars, so it happens.
OP, I see you have a Z51 meaning dry sump, and the Car & Driver test car also had dry sump. My C7 is also Z51, but no issues so far, and had my first oil change about 2 weeks ago at 4300 miles. I just wonder if all the issues are related to the filters on the dry sump engines. GM has built other dry sump engines so they are not new to this. But I also wonder if the oil filters at the center of these issues were manufactured all in one batch, and therefore all have defects. With so many Z51's out there, and so few major problems (I hope), one would think getting to the root cause should be pretty straightforward.