When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Will Gm continue to offer a front engined corvette? The majority of Corvette owners are not boy racers and do not take part in track days. We want a sports car suitable for touring with good luggage capacity like the C7 coupe.
Likely only when and if Corvette becomes a separate brand. Then Like Ferrari,they can offer different models under the Corvette badge.
I've owned 3 C7s, all bought new, but I am not a Porsche guy. Corvette should care about people like me, and I hope they do.
They don't. You're yesterday's news, along with the FE Corvette, and your insistence that such a thing will happen is just laughable. None of us are important enough to influence GM decisions through forum posts. It may be interesting to discuss, but that's as far as it goes. I'm continually amazed at the number of people here who claim what they want is what all Corvette owners or potential owners want. It's not true. What you want is what you want, and that doesn't change because you speak louder or longer than anyone else. It just weakens your message.
Last edited by mschuyler; Jun 10, 2019 at 12:22 PM.
They don't. You're yesterday's news, along with the FE Corvette,
So Corvette does not care about its customers who have recently bought multiple cars? Interesting idea and a surefire way to another trip to bankruptcy court. I think they learned their lesson the first time.
So Corvette does not care about its customers who have recently bought multiple cars? Interesting idea and a surefire way to another trip to bankruptcy court. I think they learned their lesson the first time.
It does not care about extremist positions, no. Your mistake is assuming that you represent the average consumer or that because you have purchased "multiple cars," that somehow GM ought to listen to you more than someone who has purchased only one. You then go on to claim that if they do not listen to YOU, they'll go bankrupt. That is the ultimate in hubris on your part. You want what you want and I'm actually fine with that. So does everyone. The mistake here, once again, is that you assume what you want is what everyone wants. I'm not convinced that you have the pulse of the average Corvette enthusiast. You have not done any valid marketing studies here. You just have an opinion. Don't mistake your opinion for an in-depth understanding of the Corvette marketplace. You don't speak for all of us. Actually, you don't speak for any of us. And if GM never sold another Corvette ever, they wouldn't go bankrupt. That's just silly.
They don't. You're yesterday's news, along with the FE Corvette, and your insistence that such a thing will happen is just laughable. None of us are important enough to influence GM decisions through forum posts. It may be interesting to discuss, but that's as far as it goes. I'm continually amazed at the number of people here who claim what they want is what all Corvette owners or potential owners want. It's not true. What you want is what you want, and that doesn't change because you speak louder or longer than anyone else. It just weakens your message.
The more I read about the possibilities of the finished C8, the more convinced I am that I made the right choice in buying a new Convertible, M7 C7.
The manual is gone and the convertible is gone. Hopefully, my C7 will give me years of good service. Regardless where the engine is.
The mistake here, once again, is that you assume what you want is what everyone wants. I'm not convinced that you have the pulse of the average Corvette enthusiast. You have not done any valid marketing studies here. .
Please show me ANY marketing study of Corvette enthusiasts who want a ME instead of a FE? Just show me one. You cannot.
LMAO. No company in any business is going to share their proprietary marketing data with any outside source. And no outside source is going to **** away money doing marketing studies just for the hell of it.
The more I read about the possibilities of the finished C8, the more convinced I am that I made the right choice in buying a new Convertible, M7 C7.
The manual is gone and the convertible is gone. Hopefully, my C7 will give me years of good service. Regardless where the engine is.
We get it... all you do is post your confirmation bias multiple times a day.
^^^^
Oh my lord...enough with the convertible stuff already. Jeez.
LOL . . . Skid Row is what I consider to be a bit of a mixed-breed CFer, part troll, part legit forum member. His recent convertible name-games are indicative of the former. He's just having fun getting a rise out of folks.
LMAO. No company in any business is going to share their proprietary marketing data with any outside source. And no outside source is going to **** away money doing marketing studies just for the hell of it.
But his point (I think) is that the switch to ME is probably not based on a marketing study of Corvette owners/enthusiasts. I've long felt it was based on Tadge's comments about FE being maxed out combined with a belief that Corvette could poach sales from the competition based solely on the switch to a ME platform (ie, some people will just buy a ME sports car for various reasons).
The funniest (and saddest) part of this front engine debate is how MAD some on this very forum were way back in 2012 when it became obvious the C7 would NOT be mid-engine. Now, 7 years later, we get the reverse. Just like the early C7 DCT hand wringing.
But his point (I think) is that the switch to ME is probably not based on a marketing study of Corvette owners/enthusiasts. I've long felt it was based on Tadge's comments about FE being maxed out combined with a belief that Corvette could poach sales from the competition based solely on the switch to a ME platform (ie, some people will just buy a ME sports car for various reasons).
Having spent a lot of time in boardrooms and corporate executive suites, I am certain there was substantial market research done. Big companies like GM don't make existential decisions like that based upon intuition, and Tadge does not have the HP to pull something like that off. He may have led the team that put together the pitch, but he had to have enough ammo (aka data) to sell it way above his pay grade.
Having spent a lot of time in boardrooms and corporate executive suites, I am certain there was substantial market research done. Big companies like GM don't make existential decisions like that based upon intuition, and Tadge does not have the HP to pull something like that off. He may have led the team that put together the pitch, but he had to have enough ammo (aka data) to sell it way above his pay grade.
Oh I agree, and I probably should have reversed the order of the "Tadge said" and "poach sales" statement. I'm sure they had market research that caused them to make the move, but to PCM's point, was it "Corvette enthusiasts" or a wider net? I suspect a much wider net to specifically include Porsche buyers.
Oh I agree, and I probably should have reversed the order of the "Tadge said" and "poach sales" statement. I'm sure they had market research that caused them to make the move, but to PCM's point, was it "Corvette enthusiasts" or a wider net? I suspect a much wider net to specifically include Porsche buyers.
Analysis was performed on the “market” of which current Corvette owners/enthusiasts are a much smaller subset.
A very wide net to include both Corvette enthusiasts, as well as all potential sports car buyers of all brands. Basing a decision like this upon what Corvette loyalists alone want would have been beyond foolish.
Having spent a lot of time in boardrooms and corporate executive suites, I am certain there was substantial market research done. Big companies like GM don't make existential decisions like that based upon intuition, and Tadge does not have the HP to pull something like that off. He may have led the team that put together the pitch, but he had to have enough ammo (aka data) to sell it way above his pay grade.
Going from FE to ME is not a trivial change and obviously took a great deal of deliberation. My recollection is that a ME Corvette was being rumored many years ago. So there's no doubt that there was a great amount of due diligence given to this change, but only time will tell if GM got it right. I'm certain that Coke gave a great deal of thought changing their Coke formulation when they offered the "New Coke." But the market outcry was so intensely negative that they were compelled to bring back the classic coke and not many years later the "New Coke" was discontinued.
A very wide net to include both Corvette enthusiasts,as well as all potential sports car buyers of all brands. Basing a decision like this on what Corvette loyalists alone want would have been beyond foolish.
Right, so PCM's comment was kinda accurate. Yeah, GM isn't going to share it, but there also is unlikely a study that focused just on Corvette enthusiasts.
If it was a study just based on Corvette buyers, based on this forum, the storage space would be enough for Metallica to go on a world tour.
Marketing analyses are a better basis for decision-making than intuition, but they're not entirely accurate either. It's no different with any other type of polling data.