When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Mayonayze..........I can agree with your statement. The stock airbox is sufficient for the stock motor. Once you start adding mods, however, then a you'll see the benefits of a CIA.
I had the Vararam on top of my list, but a few things made me nervous.
1. A lot of complaints on fit and finish - I really don't want to put something cheesy on my $50k car.
2. TBYRNE told me that there is a max of a 1-2 HP difference between the Vararam and LPE (the other on my short list)
3. Supply issues - As of today, 5/9, they are still having trouble getting the new filters
4. Poor customer service - I have read on more than a few posts that people are getting no or bad responses when checking into shipment.
So, I will have my LPE tomorrow. Lingenfelter has a great reputation and there CAI looks like it has a very high level of quality. 1-2 HP isn't enough to sway me.
LG Headers, LPE Intake, Throttle Body Spacer, Intake Manifold flashing cleaned out, and a tune all within the next week.
numbers talk man. like i said in a previous post...the CAIs have been adding an additional 15-20rwhp to header packages with tuning. as a stand alone mod, no intake is going to do much of anything. but as part of an overall mod plan, its utility increases significantly.
12.91 vararam spacer12.38 kooks long tubes high flow cats tune 12.06
Mayonayze..........I can agree with your statement. The stock airbox is sufficient for the stock motor. Once you start adding mods, however, then a you'll see the benefits of a CAI.
I had the Vararam on top of my list, but a few things made me nervous.
2. TBYRNE told me that there is a max of a 1-2 HP difference between the Vararam and LPE (the other on my short list)
So, I will have my LPE tomorrow. Lingenfelter has a great reputation and there CAI looks like it has a very high level of quality.
Did TBYRNE track test and dyno test each one on the same car/same day?
I do see a lot of appearance items on his cars but rarely hear about track numbers.
And LPE does have a great reputation but those track numbers from Vararammed C5s (and yes I know the C6 Vararam is not the same) don't lie either.
If there is only a 1-2rwhp difference between the two then I would certainly go with the better quality looking piece but if there is bigger gap in power making potential between the two CAIs (I'm doubting there is) I would go with the better performer personally, fashion is secondary for me.
I had to reread your post a couple of times. I thought you were stelling me not to lie. Just figured out that you were saying that LPE doesn't lie. I had a couple of other shops try to steer me away from Vararam for various resons.
I have no idea if TBYRNE tested the cars on the same day. I really kind of doubt it. CAIs have to be the toughest purchase with all the BS numbers out there. It is hard to know who to trust.
I still think the Vararam is a good performer. It's just that the reasons not to buy one added up. The main one was the supply issue. I can not stand having long tube headers sitting in my garage staring at me and don't want to pay to tune twice (once with headers and another with headers and CAI)
I had to reread your post a couple of times. I thought you were stelling me not to lie. Just figured out that you were saying that LPE doesn't lie. I had a couple of other shops try to steer me away from Vararam for various resons.
I have no idea if TBYRNE tested the cars on the same day. I really kind of doubt it. CAIs have to be the toughest purchase with all the BS numbers out there. It is hard to know who to trust.
I still think the Vararam is a good performer. It's just that the reasons not to buy one added up. The main one was the supply issue. I can not stand having long tube headers sitting in my garage staring at me and don't want to pay to tune twice (once with headers and another with headers and CAI)
i put mine cai no tune drove it 200 miles per directions great results
I'd like to hear from anybody who's had problems with the Vararam ie: water in the engine. I just had one delivered and I'm having 2nd thoughts about installing it now.
Here are my thoughts on the Hydrolock issue.... I've seen the VaraRam and it looks to me that you could put a water hose in it, turn it on full blast and the water would just come right back out the inlet. IE: Get a drinking glass and turn it on it's side. Imagine putting a water hose to the rim and turning it on.... will the glass fill to the top? I don't think so. I think the only way to Hydrolock with this intake is the whole inlet "plane" would have to be blocked by water, creating a seal. Only then could the water be "vacuumed" up the intake. I think that is why when you look on the VaraRam website it says "you will have to submerse the nose of the car".
(The air travels in an "S" pattern, starting at the bottom of the "S")
DISCLAMER: THIS IS JUST MY OPINION
Last edited by sallen619; May 10, 2006 at 02:14 AM.
I just switched from a Callaway "Honker" to the new "Snake charmer" and I really did feel a difference. The car is definetly peppier and throttle response is better. Vararam has always been great with regard to customer service. If I don't like their product, I can take it off my car and ship it back and they will pay for the shipping. Can't beat that.
Just installed the Honker.
What a nice piece.
Perfect fitting, nicely engineered and quality built CAI!
Guess I'll have to check out SOP meter.
I had Callaway install the "Honker". I didn't feel anything after install. Just switched to the "Snakecharmer" and felt something good. This is the second time I have tried the Vararam (once in my C5) and noticed a nice difference.
Here are my thoughts on the Hydrolock issue.... I've seen the VaraRam and it looks to me that you could put a water hose in it, turn it on full blast and the water would just come right back out the inlet. IE: Get a drinking glass and turn it on it's side. Imagine putting a water hose to the rim and turning it on.... will the glass fill to the top? I don't think so. I think the only way to Hydrolock with this intake is the whole inlet "plane" would have to be blocked by water, creating a seal. Only then could the water be "vacuumed" up the intake. I think that is why when you look on the VaraRam website it says "you will have to submerse the nose of the car".
(The air travels in an "S" pattern, starting at the bottom of the "S")
If you plan on being a U-boat commander with your vette then hydrolock may be a problem. But if you avoid water as much as you can and don't drive into a lake you'll be fine. That's how I think Ed at LPE put it to me lol.
Here are my thoughts on the Hydrolock issue.... I've seen the VaraRam and it looks to me that you could put a water hose in it, turn it on full blast and the water would just come right back out the inlet. IE: Get a drinking glass and turn it on it's side. Imagine putting a water hose to the rim and turning it on.... will the glass fill to the top? I don't think so. I think the only way to Hydrolock with this intake is the whole inlet "plane" would have to be blocked by water, creating a seal. Only then could the water be "vacuumed" up the intake. I think that is why when you look on the VaraRam website it says "you will have to submerse the nose of the car".
(The air travels in an "S" pattern, starting at the bottom of the "S")
DISCLAMER: THIS IS JUST MY OPINION
I don't think hydrolock is a big threat, but here is the problem with your example: When you have a bottom feeder on your car, and you rev the engine, you will hear a sucking sound. There was a clip that someone posted that shows this.
These intakes actually suck air in. With heavy amounts of water(not necessarily submerging), it will seal against the water and suck it in.
Basically, I agree with you water is not much of an issue.
The C5 vararam had a couple of holes in the intake tubes. That way if you sealed the end with water it still would not hydrolock. Like a hole in a straw when you are drinking a soda.
The C5 vararam had a couple of holes in the intake tubes. That way if you sealed the end with water it still would not hydrolock. Like a hole in a straw when you are drinking a soda.
I really do not know how much it would help. I was really just stating what the intent of the two holes were for. Air is much lighter than water though, so if you give the intake a choice it is going to suck air. Although the holes were fairly small, so that makes a difference.
I would guess when people hydrolock an intake it is not so much from sucking water though, I would say they probably have rammed water up the intake with their forward motion. So in that case not much will help.
I had two C5's with vararams. My first C5 was a DD, so I drove it in the rain some. No problems.
Any intake can hydrolock if the water is deep enough.
I really do not know how much it would help. I was really just stating what the intent of the two holes were for. Air is much lighter than water though, so if you give the intake a choice it is going to suck air. Although the holes were fairly small, so that makes a difference.
I would guess when people hydrolock an intake it is not so much from sucking water though, I would say they probably have rammed water up the intake with their forward motion. So in that case not much will help.
I had two C5's with vararams. My first C5 was a DD, so I drove it in the rain some. No problems.
Any intake can hydrolock if the water is deep enough.
I appreciate your thoughts on this but that will have no effect at all and in fact may aid the event if water particles get to the engine side of that hole. Water wake caused by front wheels will take a 2 inch water puddle and make it nearly 6 inches very quickly and wa-la you have a water event.
I think if I were worried about hydrolock with a vararam (which I am not) I would do this.
Put 3 inch round hole up a foot or so in the intake tube. Then hot glue some filter material over the hole. During normal operation the intake would get air through the area of least resistance which would be the inlet tube opening. If you sealed the inlet tube with water it would suck air in through the hole. Unless you now decide to set in a foot deep puddle and rev your engine I don't think it would hydrolock.