C6 Tech/Performance LS2, LS3, LS7, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Tech Topics, Basic Tech, Maintenance, How to Remove & Replace
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Old Tech vs. New

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 08:32 AM
  #61  
COVERT GUY's Avatar
COVERT GUY
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Houston Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Rebel 1
100% correct

The tire patch was about the size of a coke can.

Bob
I believe that is why they raced on slicks, duh.
The old shcool cars would still get raped by modern muscle.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 09:25 AM
  #62  
AirBusPilot's Avatar
AirBusPilot
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,578
Likes: 61
From: Austin TX
Default

Originally Posted by Rebel 1
Wrong, according to Chilton.

Chevrolet Corvette engine:
1984 - 205 HP. 290 TORQUE
1985 - 205 HP. 290 TORQUE
1986-88- 230HP. 330 TORQUE

I was at the track and beat them. I know what they ran because i was there.
Chilton? lol, no wonder you're confused.

I was at the track too. That's what mine ran. And so did a slew of other stock vettes in our group. If your stock turbo regal was quicker, fine. The one I raced from a roll wasn't.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 10:41 AM
  #63  
66biskwik's Avatar
66biskwik
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: Warwick NY
Default

http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclec...s-50fast.shtml

This list isn't really accurate since the gear ratios were all different. Though it does give you some idea especially comparing against each other. The other lists aren't up to date.


50 FASTEST MUSCLECARS
# YEAR/MODEL ET/MPH ENGINE HP TRANS GEAR SOURCE
1 1966 427 Cobra 12.20@118 427 8V 425 4-Speed 3.54 CC 11/65
2 1966 Corvette 427 12.8@112 L72 427 425 4-Speed 3.36 CD 11/65
3 1969 Road Runner 12.91@111.8 440 Six BBL 390 4-Speed 4.10 SS 6/69
4 1970 Hemi Cuda 13.10@107.12 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 3.54 CC 11/69
5 1970 Chevelle SS454 13.12@107.01 454 LS6 450 4-Speed 3.55 CC 11/69
6 1969 Camaro 13.16@110.21 427 ZL1 430 4-Speed 4.10 HC 6/69
7 1968 Corvette 13.30@108 427 6V 435 4-Speed 3.70 HC 5/68
8 1970 Road Runner 13.34@107.5 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 SS 12/69
9 1970 Buick GS Stage I 13.38@105.5 455 Stage I 360 automatic 3.64 MT 1/70
10 1968 Corvette 427 13.41@109.5 L72 427 425 4-Speed 3.55 CD 6/68
11 1969 Charger 500 13.48@109 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 4.10 HR 2/69
12 1968 Charger 13.50@105 426 Hemi 425 automatic 3.23 CD 11/67
12 1970 Plymouth Superbird 13.50@105 426 Hemi 425 ? ? ?
14 1968 Road Runner 13.54@105.1 426 Hemi 425 automatic 3.55 CD 1/69
15 1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
16 1969 Corvette 13.56@111.1 427 L88 430 automatic 3.36 HR 4/69
17 1969 Super Bee 13.56@105.6 440 Six Pack 390 automatic 4.10 HR 8/69
18 1969 Boss 429 Mustang 13.60@106 Boss 429 375 4-Speed 3.91 HC 9/69
19 1970 Challenger R/T 13.62@104.3 440 Six Pack 390 automatic 3.23 CC 11/69
20 1970 Torino Cobra 13.63@105.9 429 SCJ 370 automatic 3.91 SS 3/70
21 1968 Biscayne 13.65@105 427 L72 425 4-Speed 4.56 SS 4/68
22 1964 Polara 500 13.70@107.37 426 4V 365 4-Speed 3.23 HC 2/64
23 1969 GTX 13.70@102.8 440 4V 375 automatic 4.10 MT 1/69
24 1969 Dart 440 13.71@105 440 4V 375 automatic 3.55 CC 5/69
25 1971 Road Runner 13.71@101.2 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 CC 1/71
26 1971 Cuda 13.72@106 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 SS 4/71
27 1971 Corvette 13.72@102.04 454 LS6 450 4-Speed 3.36 CL 8/71
28 1971 Super Bee 13.73@104 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 MT 12/70
29 1968 Hurst/Olds 13.77@103.91 455 W-30 390 automatic 3.91 SS 8/68
30 1970 Hemi 'Cuda 13.78@101.2 426 Hemi 425 automatic 4.10 MT 9/69
31 1968 Firebird 13.79@106 400 HO 335 4-Speed N/A HR 3/68
32 1967 Corvette 13.80@108 427 6V 435 4-Speed 3.55 HR 5/67
33 1965 Catalina 13.80@106 421 6V ? 4-Speed 3.42 CD 3/65
34 1969 Super Bee Six Pack 13.80@104.2 440 Six BBL 390 automatic 4.10 CD 7/69
35 1971 Boss 351 Mustang 13.80@104 Boss 351 330 4-Speed 3.91 MT 1/71
36 1966 Satellite 13.81@104 426 Hemi 425 4-Speed 3.54 CD 4/66
37 1969 Coronet R/T 13.83@102.27 440 4V 375 4-Speed 4.10 SS 4/69
38 1968 Cyclone GT 13.86@101.69 428 CJ 335 automatic 4.11 MT 8/68
39 1969 Nova SS 396 13.87@105.1 396 4V 375 automatic 3.55 HR 7/69
40 1969 Shelby GT-500 13.87@104.52 428 CJ 335 4-Speed 3.91 SS 9/69
41 1969 Cyclone Cobra Jet 13.88@101.7 428 CJ 335 automatic 4.11 MT 1/69
42 1970 Olds 4-4-2 W-30 13.88@95.84 455 W-30 370 automatic 3.42 CC 11/69
43 1962 Corvette 13.89@105.14 327 FI 360 4-Speed 4.10 HR 1/62
44 1969 Barracuda 13.89@103.21 440 4V 375 automatic 4.10 SS 8/69
45 1962 Catalina 13.90@107 421 4V ? 4-Speed 4.30 MT 5/62
46 1969 Mustang Mach I 13.90@103.32 428 CJ 335 automatic 3.50 CL 3/69
47 1967 GTO 13.90@102.8 400 RA 360 automatic 4.33 CL 10/67
48 1970 Trans Am 13.90@102 400 RA 345 4-Speed 3.91 HR 2/70
49 1970 Torino Cobra 13.99@101 429 4V ? 4-Speed 3.91 MT 2/70
Legend: CC=Car Craft, CD=Car and Driver, CL=Car Life, HC=Hi Performance Cars, HR=Hot Rod, MCR=Muscle Car Review, MM=Mopar Muscle, MT=Motor Trend, SS=Super Stock
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 12:23 PM
  #64  
HOXXOH's Avatar
HOXXOH
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,557
Likes: 2,104
From: Peoria/Phoenix AZ
C6 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019
Default

Such a wide range of times depended on the driver, which makes that whole list of little to no value.
Simply compare the #2 1966 Corvette at 12.8 @ 112 to the nearly identically equipped #32 1967 Corvette at 13.8 @108 and the #7 1968 Corvette at 13.3 @ 108
Kinda makes you wonder why a slightly better gear ratio would slow you down by a full second, but an even better gear split that difference exactly in half.

It's equally hard to explain why the heavier #5 Chevelle ran .6 quicker than the same powered #27 Corvette with such a minor difference in gear ratio.

And to top it off, the #4 and #30 1970 'Cuda with only a trans/gear change were .68 second and 6 mph difference.

That stuff alone, makes that list useless.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #65  
66biskwik's Avatar
66biskwik
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: Warwick NY
Default

But it does show how slow the times were compared to today's performance cars.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 03:32 PM
  #66  
Rod320's Avatar
Rod320
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default Maybe thats true, maybe it's not....., jus say.n

Originally Posted by camirocz
60 s cars were 14 second pigs.People tend to enhance the performance of their cars when recanting old stories.ls6 chevelle s and hemi cudas were high 12s with slicks and gears and s.d trans ams were 14 flat cars.Todays cars are faster than ever thats for sure.There are no 60s or 70s cars to race z06,zr1 porsche 911 turbo or gtr.Stock vs stock its not even a fair matchup.
Everything the OP has said holds a certain amount of truth..however if given one of the said "lesser 60's model cars" would you be willing to take that challenge? BTW,the Z06 is a historical solid performer and with that being said will be a bench mark for many many moons.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #67  
Rebel 1's Avatar
Rebel 1
Drifting
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 7
From: Bristol raceway area
Default

Originally Posted by COVERT GUY
I believe that is why they raced on slicks, duh.
The old shcool cars would still get raped by modern muscle.
Who cares, duh? You brought it up.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 10:12 PM
  #68  
Rebel 1's Avatar
Rebel 1
Drifting
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 7
From: Bristol raceway area
Default

Originally Posted by AirBusPilot
Chilton? lol, no wonder you're confused.

I was at the track too. That's what mine ran. And so did a slew of other stock vettes in our group. If your stock turbo regal was quicker, fine. The one I raced from a roll wasn't.
I don't get confused by facts. I leave that up to you.

Edit: You Didn't dispute Chiltons numbers? Why?

'84 and '86 were correct. Link shows others were not.

Last edited by Rebel 1; Dec 5, 2011 at 12:18 AM. Reason: correction
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 11:06 PM
  #69  
glass slipper's Avatar
glass slipper
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,328
Likes: 405
Default

Originally Posted by Rebel 1
I don't get confused by facts. I leave that up to you.

Edit: You Didn't dispute Chiltons numbers? Why?
I completely agree with you, facts will never confuse anyone. Unfortunately, the Chiltons manual you're using as a reference is factually WRONG! Anyone using a Chilton manual as a reference in a debate has lost the battle before it even begins. You have been confused by fiction.

Do some research at a reputable site like:
http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/specs/c4/

PS AirBusPilot did dispute the Chilton numbers. Why...because they're wrong. If you look through the site above, you'll find the numbers he quoted are correct.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 11:31 PM
  #70  
Rebel 1's Avatar
Rebel 1
Drifting
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 7
From: Bristol raceway area
Default

Originally Posted by glass slipper
I completely agree with you, facts will never confuse anyone. Unfortunately, the Chiltons manual you're using as a reference is factually WRONG! Anyone using a Chilton manual as a reference in a debate has lost the battle before it even begins. You have been confused by fiction.

Do some research at a reputable site like:
http://www.corvetteactioncenter.com/specs/c4/

PS AirBusPilot did dispute the Chilton numbers. Why...because they're wrong. If you look through the site above, you'll find the numbers he quoted are correct.
Chilton was published and distributed. If it is not correct that's not my fault.
I didn't have a link. Now i do.

According to the link provided, Chilton had 2 correct. '84 @205 Hp. and the 86 @230Hp. but not the others. Took care of that.

Last edited by Rebel 1; Dec 4, 2011 at 11:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 04:28 AM
  #71  
3 Z06ZR1's Avatar
3 Z06ZR1
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,933
Likes: 905
From: salem OR
Default

Originally Posted by fnsblum
May I start by saying the devil made me open this topic. I am sitting here watching Pass Time on the Speed Channel. I have read a lot of post here about how much faster the new 427 is compared to days gone by. I like new technology but grew up in the days of watching the big blocks duke it out every Friday night. I just watched a 67 Fairlane 500 running AA/S turn 10.10 @ 132. The owner/driver looked old enough to have run it back in 67. He claimed it was as it came from the factory except for some bolt owns like headers and slicks. Also had a full interior. Interesting to say the least. Later! Frank
That is the catch! He claimed stock
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 06:58 AM
  #72  
COVERT GUY's Avatar
COVERT GUY
Pro
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Houston Texas
Default

Nice debate, but at the end of the day the fact remains todays cars are not only faster but are better in every measureable performance, effiency and safety aspect. I speak the truth - I hurt feelings.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 PM.

story-0
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE