When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
but all this is not even as important as the OP - the Parking brake is also an EMERGENCY BRAKE
It is not and hasn't been for quite some time. As stated in the other thread: emergency brakes are no longer required and haven't been for some time. Period.
And I'm willing on betting that exactly zero people on this thread, and maybe you can count on one hand of all forum members who actually could do this maneuver if they tried. Reminds me of motorcycle forums where people don't want ABS because they contend that they can't "put the bike down" in the event of an impending crash. I ask them how many times they have practiced putting a bike down at speed.
I agree and did not mean to imply that I want the old manual parking brake handle in a car like the C7. This seems like a great solution that should enhance several aspects of C7 enjoyment.
I bet you're wrong.... I personally know of at least 4 who used to do it regularly, sometimes to parallel park in an entertaining cloud of smoke. Bottom line, who cares. A car should do exactly and only what you tell it to do, every time, the same way, and never do anything at all you don't tell it to.
If I pull the parking brake, try to open the door, turn the lights on or off or any other system, it should do it. if I want to turn the car over in gear on the starter, it should do it. If I regret it, that 's my problem. If I want to drift a car into a corner sideways on the brakes, it should do it.
I don't want some annoying warning popping up all the time.
I can't accept a throttle or brake pedal that argues with my inputs.
I can live with concessions for basic abs (with no vses, no drp stability functions, no edc) but that's it.
A car that won't open the freaking door or use the rear brakes or the e brake when I want it to, or that chimes or dings at me, or changes the volume or temperature on me, or won't turn off the lights, all that is just bullcrap.
but all this is not even as important as the OP - the Parking brake is also an EMERGENCY BRAKE, it should be a powerful and independent mechanical brake that is not dependent upon any other system in the car (especially battery power or brake hydraulics) and works exactly as the user directs, to prevent the rear wheels from moving when and in the amount applied.
anything less is gross negligence and inexcusable.
Then why are you on the C7 forum? You need to be on the C3 forum as that's the last time cars could do all the things you want without the electronic nanny's holding you back. I'm not saying I don't understand your point btw, but its just not real world anymore.
It is not and hasn't been for quite some time. As stated in the other thread: emergency brakes are no longer required and haven't been for some time. Period.
jas
the e brake, or the p brake in the new c7 is NOT hydraulic it is a electric actuated mechanical brake ,can you not understand this
The only time my parking brake is used, is when the state inspection is performed.
you must have an auto
and before the manual guys chime in about how crappy the factory lever brake is, mine was crappy, too... until i adjusted the cable to make it as tight as it was supposed to be. before, i could push the car with the brake on, but after fixing it, it'll hold itself on a slight hill in neutral
Are there a lot of 90 year olds on here or what? These brakes have been on cars for some time and they work just fine and make the old style totally obsolete. Its time to move on and catch up with the times. The last three or four of my cars have this brake and it's a totally welcome change.
You missed the point. No matter whether it's safer or not, button is a wussy item. It's about control and the joy of driving. Just because the older manual handbrake didn't work as well as it should it doesn't mean that the design is inherently flawed, just the implementation.
Even so, I've never been in a car where someone hit the ebrake in a way that locked wheels. But I have been in cars where someone threw the transmission in R of the freeway and it did fire back. I've also been hit by a guy who started the car in reverse instead of drive. I think ****** drivers select themselves into autos, not that all auto drivers are ******. I've been nearly hit by another reverse by mistake auto driver but never been in that situation with a manual driven car. Despite the fact that they roll back easily on hills the drivers are much better and compensate for the simplicity of the transmission with skill. How about that.
Generally when I'm doing anything with the e-brake, I'm not driving. I'm parking or moments away from driving. I don't consider the e-brake a part of my driving routine any different from starting the car. That's push button too. Is that "wussy"? If you think so, tell that to race car drivers.
Originally Posted by B747VET
The only thing you probably lose with this setup is any chance of pulling off a nice bank robber's 180. Saved my life once in my 1989 Z51 with that maneuver but that's a long story and was a once in 100 lifetimes situation after being run off the road by a semi at night. Still, 180's are fun.
Problem solved. Look below.
Originally Posted by jvp
I'm not sure how many times I need to repeat myself in this and other threads, but: the electronic brake in the CTS-V works just fine even when the car is in gear and moving. So unless GM has re-written the controller software for that, it'll activate when you're in motion.
jas
Nice... I can't imagine actually needing it to operate while I'm driving.
Originally Posted by arkus
How would you take off from an incline when using a stick shift with the E brake .
Learn how to drive a stick.
Two ways you can do this. The correct way and the incorrect way:
Correct way:
Keep the clutch and brake peddle pressed all the way in.
Keep the car in first gear at the stop. (You should do this NO MATTER WHAT, regardless of an incline.)
When the light turns green, or it's time to go, begin letting off the clutch at the same time you let off the brake.
Immediately give the car gas and quickly but smoothly let out more of the clutch until the car either stays stationary (not rolling back) or begins to roll forward.
Balance the clutch and gas and smoothly accelerate forward.
This process should take no more than 1 second. Practice makes perfect.
Incorrect way:
While coming up to the stop, hold the clutch half way in so that it's partially engaged.
Modulate the gas and clutch to keep the car stationary or rolling back and forth, giving you control of the car without using the brake.
When the light turns green, or it's time to go, you simply let out the clutch and give it more gas.
This is bad for the entire driveline. I recommend you DO NOT do this. It's the incorrect and "Newb" way to drive on an incline. You will very quickly burn out your clutch, and possibly hurt your transmission, differential and even your engine.
Last edited by SCM_Crash; Feb 9, 2013 at 06:00 AM.
I'm not sure what I was supposed to be looking below at. The system won't let you do bootleggers, if that's what you mean. It activates all four calipers, bypassing the ABS completely. The wheels will lock and you'll flat-spot the tires if you're not careful.
I'm not sure what I was supposed to be looking below at. The system won't let you do bootleggers, if that's what you mean. It activates all four calipers, bypassing the ABS completely. The wheels will lock and you'll flat-spot the tires if you're not careful.
jas
LOL! I put the quotes in the wrong order... Ooops. (Fixed)
The brake should not depend on battery power or brake hydraulics as a matter of fundamental redundancy. And t should only work the rear rotors as a matter of safety for a rear drive car as well as for the coincidence of being fun.
Just because the world is ruled by electrical and software folks these days does not justify departure from sound principles.
I have had experience using an "Automatic-Electric" parking brake on a rental van in Europe last year.... What a disaster that was. Of course the rental was so under powered that it would stall before I could get the E-Brake disengaged. With a bit more torque it may be useable, and for those of you who may say, "Learn how to drive manual transmission vehicles." I drive a 2008 Z06 and never have a problem with the gears. The rental van was a Renualt mini-van and we used it in the Alps.
Last edited by First Z06; Feb 9, 2013 at 11:15 AM.
Reason: Edited for clarity
Just because the world is ruled by electrical and software folks these days does not justify departure from sound principles.
And who says your ideas are sound principles? As it turns out, a PARKING BRAKE (which this is) that activates all 4 calipers and locks them shut is actually a perfectly acceptable and quite powerful tool to keep the car from moving when it's parked. Which is precisely its job.
stuff i gotta ask is does this system have its own master cylinder setup? will that have to be checked/serviced? how much more is this gonna cost to fix when it breaks than a standard cable/shoe system? what are the weight differences between all these components compared to the normal system?
It is not and hasn't been for quite some time. As stated in the other thread: emergency brakes are no longer required and haven't been for some time. Period.
Wrong on the face of it. Why would you NOT want some sort of further means of applying brake independent of the hydraulic system? That makes less than no sense. Just because master cylinders have two zones changes nothing about the wisdom of also have a mechanical braking option. Double Period.
Are there a lot of 90 year olds on here or what? These brakes have been on cars for some time and they work just fine and make the old style totally obsolete. Its time to move on and catch up with the times. The last three or four of my cars have this brake and it's a totally welcome change.
Everything electronic always works perfectly on GM vehicles, especially the first model year in use. Oh. Wait.
is anybody here contesting whether or not it's required by law? you're the only one bringing that up. everybody else is talking about how they don't like the implementation of the system.
the big beef is that most people would prefer to have a parking brake that works independently of the hydraulic system (which just so happens to be the same rule for the old emergency brakes) so that, in the event of a hydraulic failure - be it a bad valve, cut line, etc., the car will still stay in place regardless of the transmission setting
stuff i gotta ask is does this system have its own master cylinder setup? will that have to be checked/serviced? how much more is this gonna cost to fix when it breaks than a standard cable/shoe system? what are the weight differences between all these components compared to the normal system?
and come to think of it, it could be similar to a line-lock, but then there'd have to be an electronic actuation of the master cylinder... hmmm
Basically, it is what it is. Unless you quite literally experience a one in a million situation, you will likely never have the slightest complaint about this system. At this point, we are all guessing as to exactly what the potential pitfalls are, so maybe just wait and see.
One thing for certain, with this type of PARKING BRAKE system, you do have to be careful after extreme intensive use of the brakes such as track use or autocrossing. You cannot set this type of parking brake until the brakes have cooled to a more normal level. If you are really using these brakes to their max performance level, it will probably take about 20 to 30 minutes for them to cool to the point that you can safely set the parking brake.