Corvette's Rival
If C7 feels and drives like a boat, I will buy something nimble and fun. All those other cars except C6 are cheaper than C7 in my country.(lightly used, max 50000km on motor)
Corvette and Cadillac interiors have been getting much better than before. Do you think it's because they've benchmarked GM/American products, or do you suppose it's because they've benchmarked the Germans?
Underside of the hood unacceptable...yes, because as we all know, drivers spend so much time there.
At least they provide proper jacking point supports (where C6 owners have had to take parts from BMWs from the early 90s). Properly real materials on the inside and not the obviously fake screen-printed stuff. Puddle lights to keep your feet dry? You can have that. Ambient lighting to spruce up the interior? You can have that. A level of a la carte customization well and truly beyond even the latest Cadillacs? You can have that. Power folding mirrors? Ditto. A power retractable folding roof? The convertible doesn't come any other way. At least BMW made it to F1...having won the World Championship in the past, not to mention Le Mans (outright, not just class wins), powering not only prototypes but also none other than the McLaren F1 roadcar and racers, multiple 24 Hours of Nurburgring, even a WRC rally. Many of these were full in-house efforts, not contracted out to, say, Katech types.
But yes, they've pissed away some money there. And on the whole Rover fiasco. Yet here's a key difference: They didn't face bankruptcy and need to ask for a government bailout. They didn't shutter their factories and dealerships. You don't "**** away" that money unless you've got it, and you don't get that money by overcharging. They charge what the market will bear. And the market has voted with its money that the M3 is worth what BMW have been asking for it. When the market disagress, you get turkeys like the 8-Series and 3-Series Compact. Pretty much proof that it isn't all about marketing: No matter what badge is on the car, you still have to supply the kind of product that backs up what you're asking people to pay.
Underside of the hood unacceptable...yes, because as we all know, drivers spend so much time there.
At least they provide proper jacking point supports (where C6 owners have had to take parts from BMWs from the early 90s). Properly real materials on the inside and not the obviously fake screen-printed stuff. Puddle lights to keep your feet dry? You can have that. Ambient lighting to spruce up the interior? You can have that. A level of a la carte customization well and truly beyond even the latest Cadillacs? You can have that. Power folding mirrors? Ditto. A power retractable folding roof? The convertible doesn't come any other way. At least BMW made it to F1...having won the World Championship in the past, not to mention Le Mans (outright, not just class wins), powering not only prototypes but also none other than the McLaren F1 roadcar and racers, multiple 24 Hours of Nurburgring, even a WRC rally. Many of these were full in-house efforts, not contracted out to, say, Katech types.
But yes, they've pissed away some money there. And on the whole Rover fiasco. Yet here's a key difference: They didn't face bankruptcy and need to ask for a government bailout. They didn't shutter their factories and dealerships. You don't "**** away" that money unless you've got it, and you don't get that money by overcharging. They charge what the market will bear. And the market has voted with its money that the M3 is worth what BMW have been asking for it. When the market disagress, you get turkeys like the 8-Series and 3-Series Compact. Pretty much proof that it isn't all about marketing: No matter what badge is on the car, you still have to supply the kind of product that backs up what you're asking people to pay.
Last edited by skank; Feb 12, 2013 at 04:06 AM.
Yes, the BMW is slower. Why belabor the point? It's also less sleek and can't possibly impart the low-slung sports car feel. Yet people still buy it to the point that BMW feels no compunction to lower the prices. Do you honestly think anything more than like .01% of drivers ever spend more than 1% of their time in bone stock road cars on a racetrack? Even BMW M's former director acknowledged that the M3 is seen merely as the aspirational top of the line 3-Series, rather than something even remotely the product of motorsport. They don't give a **** about lap times.
Already discussed Draexlmaier. If you can't tell the difference between an Audi A1 and a Bugatti Veyron, then there's not much more to say. I think you'd have to stare pretty intently through Corvette-tinted glasses to not see the shortcomings I've already discussed (seats, design, build, etc). Even if Draexlmaier did the updated C6 interior, please explain to me how that gap where the center console and the right dash still remains. Or how the fake CF screen print persists. Or how that grainy vinyl/leather on the console persists, only to be banished to the smooth Euro/Japanese type leather on the C7 console. It's pretty obvious that team Corvette were looking to the Europeans for inspiration; they said it as much when stating Audi was the benchmark. Think BMW bought a Corvette to benchmark their interior?

Yeah, Wixom builds the engines now. I wonder why it wasn't the other way around...And they are only class winners. It has been Audi that has been dominating Le Mans outright. And there's a good reason why the Nordschleife is called the Green Hell (and why manufacturers send teams to develop the handling and durability of their cars there, and not to Le Mans).
My wife would divorce me if I brought home a four door car. LOL
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Underside of the hood unacceptable...yes, because as we all know, drivers spend so much time there.
At least they provide proper jacking point supports (where C6 owners have had to take parts from BMWs from the early 90s). Properly real materials on the inside and not the obviously fake screen-printed stuff. Puddle lights to keep your feet dry? You can have that. Ambient lighting to spruce up the interior? You can have that. A level of a la carte customization well and truly beyond even the latest Cadillacs? You can have that. Power folding mirrors? Ditto. A power retractable folding roof? The convertible doesn't come any other way. At least BMW made it to F1...having won the World Championship in the past, not to mention Le Mans (outright, not just class wins), powering not only prototypes but also none other than the McLaren F1 roadcar and racers, multiple 24 Hours of Nurburgring, even a WRC rally. Many of these were full in-house efforts, not contracted out to, say, Katech types.
But yes, they've pissed away some money there. And on the whole Rover fiasco. Yet here's a key difference: They didn't face bankruptcy and need to ask for a government bailout. They didn't shutter their factories and dealerships. You don't "**** away" that money unless you've got it, and you don't get that money by overcharging. They charge what the market will bear. And the market has voted with its money that the M3 is worth what BMW have been asking for it. When the market disagress, you get turkeys like the 8-Series and 3-Series Compact. Pretty much proof that it isn't all about marketing: No matter what badge is on the car, you still have to supply the kind of product that backs up what you're asking people to pay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_Car_Club_of_America
"...200.000 BMW enthusiasts in about 600 BMW Clubs with all over the world"
http://www.bmwclubs-africa.org.za/ab...tional-council
What's the largest Corvette club in America?
Not at all. I'm merely discussing points of contention. If anything, the C7 will have me jumping into a Corvette someday.
And do you think the Mustang GT is every bit as good of a road car as the M3?
It was very apparent after driving all of those vehicles (I literally spent 2 days at CarMax driving cars). That the Corvette was by far the best value. And being able to buy one in great condition.. $10k under my budget made the deal even sweeter.
Now that I've been a Vette owner for two years. Other advantages over its European competition are starting to pay off rewards. 30mpg highway. Removable top. Cheap maintenance. Reliable power-train & electronics. Cheap insurance. And probably the most important part.. a red Corvette looks extremely exotic among a sea of black/silver German vehicles.
Which is very important, to me atleast, because it seems everyone in DC drives a damn black or silver German vehicle. It feels so good NOT to blend in with the crowd.
I would say yes.
It's a Drivers race on willow springs which is hardly what I would consider the smoothest track out there.
Let alone the author got a better time in the Stang than the Bimmer. In a Motor Trend article of all things, who like C&D they have a fetish for BMW.
To only beat a GT by .09 seconds if I were a BMW owner I'd just hang my head in shame and never talk about how amazing the car handles and drives again

Mind you the current stang is completely Bad ***, but still, the BMW is allegedly in a heavier weight class than a pony car.
Given that the Camaro is even quicker than the GT, why would you even buy a BMW for anything but a Nameplate? Why because it ''has an interior''? For the price tag difference alone between the cars, you could put anything you wanted in for an interior upgrade and still have enough room left over to slap a procharger setup on either the stang or camaro.
When you buy a BMW you can now be like a Buick owner. You're buying for comfort not performance
Last edited by Aaron Keating; Feb 12, 2013 at 11:33 AM.
Yes, the BMW is slower. Why belabor the point? It's also less sleek and can't possibly impart the low-slung sports car feel. Yet people still buy it to the point that BMW feels no compunction to lower the prices. Do you honestly think anything more than like .01% of drivers ever spend more than 1% of their time in bone stock road cars on a racetrack? Even BMW M's former director acknowledged that the M3 is seen merely as the aspirational top of the line 3-Series, rather than something even remotely the product of motorsport. They don't give a **** about lap times.
Already discussed Draexlmaier. If you can't tell the difference between an Audi A1 and a Bugatti Veyron, then there's not much more to say. I think you'd have to stare pretty intently through Corvette-tinted glasses to not see the shortcomings I've already discussed (seats, design, build, etc). Even if Draexlmaier did the updated C6 interior, please explain to me how that gap where the center console and the right dash still remains. Or how the fake CF screen print persists. Or how that grainy vinyl/leather on the console persists, only to be banished to the smooth Euro/Japanese type leather on the C7 console. It's pretty obvious that team Corvette were looking to the Europeans for inspiration; they said it as much when stating Audi was the benchmark. Think BMW bought a Corvette to benchmark their interior?

Yeah, Wixom builds the engines now. I wonder why it wasn't the other way around...And they are only class winners. It has been Audi that has been dominating Le Mans outright. And there's a good reason why the Nordschleife is called the Green Hell (and why manufacturers send teams to develop the handling and durability of their cars there, and not to Le Mans).


















