When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I never said it sensed the octane in the post that you quoted. I said " the C8 will adjust timing automatically to take advantage of a a higher octane". And, in the part of my post that you did not include when you quoted me, I went on to say "Here is the information form the Service Manual on how the engine adjusts the timing to adapt to different octane fuels." And following that, I posted the description from the Service Manual that describes in some detail how the knock sensors are used to adjust the timing. Part of that description says ""The control module will always try to work back to a zero compensation level, or no spark retard". While it is a fact that the Owner's Manual says "Premium unleaded gasoline meeting ASTM specification D4814 with a posted octane rating (R+M)/2 of 91 or greater is required," and in the section on tracking it says "Unleaded gasoline, rated at 93 octane or higher, is required," it is speculation as to whether or not "zero compensation level" timing is optimized for 93 octane, or higher.
The final ignition timing is determined by the ECM, and it include inputs from the knock sensors, as well as other factors. There is an ignition timing parameter that is observable with a scan tool (as well as a few intermediate timing parameters), described as "displays the final spark advance in terms of crankshaft angle," but the range of values is not given in Service Manual. And the Service Manual that I have does not state anything about octane requirements other than to use " fuel that meets the vehicle minimum octane requirements."
It basically is sensing the octane though if it’s trying to run as much timing as possible without knock? Octane rating is just a measurement of resistance to detonation. You can therefore run a later IVC or less timing to lessen the chance of detonation on a lower octane with a relatively high compression ratio, which I think is what some may not understand. I built a 6.0 in my C5 that had 11.8:1 SCR though it had a 233 intake lobe on a 113+2, so it didn’t close as early as the smaller emissions compliant LT2 cam. A later IVC doesn’t build as much cylinder pressure all else equal, therefore it lowers the octane requirement or allows more timing. All I’m saying is I believe the timing tuning on the LT2 is pretty optimized with 93 fuel and the gains from “tuning” are more so from leaning out the 60k mile warranty safe factory tune, but someone else can correct me if I’m wrong.
It basically is sensing the octane though if it’s trying to run as much timing as possible without knock? Octane rating is just a measurement of resistance to detonation. You can therefore run a later IVC or less timing to lessen the chance of detonation on a lower octane with a relatively high compression ratio, which I think is what some may not understand. I built a 6.0 in my C5 that had 11.8:1 SCR though it had a 233 intake lobe on a 113+2, so it didn’t close as early as the smaller emissions compliant LT2 cam. A later IVC doesn’t build as much cylinder pressure all else equal, therefore it lowers the octane requirement or allows more timing. All I’m saying is I believe the timing tuning on the LT2 is pretty optimized with 93 fuel and the gains from “tuning” are more so from leaning out the 60k mile warranty safe factory tune, but someone else can correct me if I’m wrong.
Yes, based on information in the this thread here,
it can use knock sensors to adjust the time for octanes between 91 and a little higher than 93. Some results appear in post 10 in that thread but were revised downward later in the thread based on some data. I originally quoted some numbers from one of the posts, but the discussion evolves in the thread and the estimates vary. The point was just that it will adjust the time in response to different octanes (and of course any other factors that contribute to conditions for knock).
Last edited by Andybump; Jul 12, 2024 at 07:21 PM.
Reason: revise the numbers
Yes -it uses the knock sensors to adjust timing to accommodate a range of octanes from 91 up to 93 or higher (100 based on the info below). And max advance is (or was) 28 degrees. The correction varied from -18 degress to 0 degrees.
A while back @bhvrdr reported results when running blends of fuel above 93. With the stock tuning. He report that "The Corvette, however, is programmed from the factory with aggressive timing tables that in this case can take advantage of around 100 octane or e30 roughly......So on a car that is targeting 28 degrees of timing but only able to make around 18 degrees of timing on 91 octane you will see 10 degrees knock retard....So now you try 96 to 98 octane fuel or e20 to e25 and you see 24 to 25 degrees timing advance with 3 to 4 degrees of knock retard. I used to also see these timing numbers adding one bottle of Lucas octane booster to 93 octane (don't use that in cars with cars and cars under warranty).....So now you try 100 octane or e30 and see 28 degrees timing advance with no knock retard. Great deal!......Now finally you can try 105 octane ms109 to check your work and you will see the identical 28 degrees advance and no knock because you reached the max timing the car was programmed to target."
Anyway, that is one of the reasons I say that will, using the knock sensors, adjust the timing to accommodate different octanes between 91 and 98 or higher (apparently up to 100). It’s not a comment about the resulting performance - just a comment on how the timing can vary.
Thanks, here’s a link to where the SAE certification was done with 93 on the C7(LT1) so I’m sure the C8(LT2) was done with it as well. They’re not leaving as much on the table these days as the more efficient an engine is, the less emissions it emits and the majority of the country has access to 93 I believe. https://www.sae.org/standards/content/cpgm1_14lt1corv/