When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I live in Iowa so E85 is readily available, I also have 91 octane no ethanol fuel available, no 93 ethanol free here. I used to put 3 gallons of E85 in the tank of my 19 Z06 along with the 91 and it definitely made a difference in performance, but that was a supercharged motor. Kind of curious if anyone is doing this with the LT2 in the C8 and if it makes more noticeable power. Would be much cheaper to do than the many bolt ons that only yield a few HP, get the same increase, and keep warranty intact. I will for sure be trying it but hopefully someone else can weigh in as to whether it helps at all. My Stingray is only a month old so no flex fuel conversion until warranty is expired and maybe not then depending on cost.
My car has a SC and Callaway told me do not use any flex fuels . I always splash my other cars with a few gallons , MB and dodge ram and the performance is noticeable as well. Been doing it for several years and no issues .
The fuel I have available in the mixture would meet octane requirements and not exceed 15% ethanol if I put 3 gallons of E85 in the tank. Actually with the octane boost of E 85 it would exceed 91 octane , don't know where it would end up but over 91 for sure. I just wonder if the ignition/fuel maps would allow the LT2 to take advantage of the increase to make any more HP. In the Fall I would cease adding E85 to purge the alcohol before Winter storage.
This adding E85 or converting to E85 doesn't make any sense in a stock LT2. There is no benefit to raising the fuels octane in and engine that has been engineered to run on 91 octane. Ethanol has a lower energy content vs gasoline to the tune of 33% less btu. So using E85 will take 30% more fuel to make the same power as gasoline. Some benefit from running E85 in engines that introduce fuel into the intake tract because of the cooling effect of the incoming air, but the LT2 is direct injected, so no benny there. The LT2 would only benefit if you...1, increase the compression ratio from11.5:1 to 13.5:1 or more. 2, install some sort of forced air induction as in turbo or super charging that would require much more fuel of a higher octane. Putting E85 in a stock LT2 is just really stupid and not worth the cost to take away power. Dumb.
Last edited by Acpantera; Jun 30, 2024 at 01:03 PM.
Interesting observations, in the thread one of the fastest C8s in the country noted they picked up 12hp/9ftlbs of torque without a tune @ 25% E, you can see the dyno sheet in the thread
Interesting observations, in the thread one of the fastest C8s in the country noted they picked up 12hp/9ftlbs of torque without a tune @ 25% E, you can see the dyno sheet in the thread
Please explain how adding fuel with less energy adds power in a stock C8. I call BS.
........ I just wonder if the ignition/fuel maps would allow the LT2 to take advantage of the increase to make any more HP. In the Fall I would cease adding E85 to purge the alcohol before Winter storage.
I'm adding a pic of a logged pass I made in 2022 before tuning was available. The upside to having widebands in the C8 is that it makes the changes in real time. Your car will adjust to the ethanol (adding fuel) and as you see, the fuel trims are pretty maxed out. I believe I was maybe at e30 ish. The ECU will compensate to a point and you get the added benefit of ethanol also being oxygenated, gasoline is not. Knock retard becomes highly unlikely so you'll get max timing too.
In the Fall I would cease adding E85 to purge the alcohol before Winter storage.
Not sure why you would do this, but perhaps I'm missing something... you'll collect the same amount of water in your tank over the winter regardless of it containing alcohol. Not to mention, when winter is over, you typically throw in some alcohol to absorb the collected water and get it into the engine where it will burn off. Keeping alcohol out during the winter months just delays the process.
I'd suggest that simply ensuring your tank is as full as possible during the winter months will reduce the amount of moisture-laden air that gets pulled in with every day's heat/cool cycle.
I started doing that and keeping a reduced fill on my C7 after experiencing gas gauge issues. One dose of Techron fixed it but a bit of preemptive planning is always better than a repair being required later. Apparently the alcohol somehow affected the sender in the tank and caused it to become inoperative. Some folks had to drop the tank and replace the sender unit.
BTW, in the C7 it was suggested to keep the tank at 1/4 during storage to allow the gauge to work better after Winter storage, not sure if the C8 is the same. I suspect this forced the gauge to have an output voltage change when the car was woke up and the tank filled after sitting for an extended period. I never had an issue after following the 1/4 tank and no ethanol during storage recommendation.
GM states in the owner's manual that up to 15% ethanol has been approved for use, with that said, a lot of us are running 20-30% to pick up that extra octane and the engine loves it. The sweet spot seems to be ~95-octane with the factory ECU & tuning. I've provided my E85 spash-blend calculator to a few guys, including @teddyca, so if anyone else wants it please just PM me your email address. I have it setup for splash-blending with both 91 E0 as the base fuel, and 93 E10, depending on your area.
To the OP in Iowa, certain Kum & Go locations (soon to be rebranded to Mavericks) do offer 93 E10 at the pump.
I just made the drive from TX to far northern Minnesota in my Jeep and ran E15/Unleaded88 the entire way, and averaged better than expected MPG due to the slight increase in octane/knock quench preventing the ECU from pulling timing as it typically does when running regular 87.
From: Early 2020 Z51 Coupe, Original Owner, Ahwatukee Foothills, AZ
Originally Posted by Kracka
GM states in the owner's manual that up to 15% ethanol has been approved for use, with that said, a lot of us are running 20-30% to pick up that extra octane and the engine loves it. The sweet spot seems to be ~95-octane. To the OP in Iowa, certain Kum & Go locations (soon to be rebranded to Mavericks) do offer 93 E10 at the pump
That's a great help to members, nice post!
And to make things a more convoluted when the 2020 C8 arrived, if you were lucky enough to own one, the C8 owner's manual clearly stated that Required Recommended Fuel was 93 octane. The LT2 engine has not changed since it's Day 1 debut. Only the manual verbiage was slightly changed and got GM around their octane warnings by manipulating their wording. Truth of the matter as stated in their 2020 and 2021 owners manual, "If unavailable, 91 May be used, BUT with Reduced performance and fuel economy".
Some associated C8 owners are not interested in maximum engine performance and some are, that's why we are here on the C8 Tech/Performance Discussion.
My CA car with 91/E85 blended to about 95 octane seems to be happy. We don't have any Kum and goes here in CA. They are called something else and they don't sell gas. I remember a few years ago while travelling for work I seen one of these stations and about lost my ****. I had to send all my buddies a picture. The kid in me couldnt get over that name. I walked in and was disappointed.
And to make things a more convoluted when the 2020 C8 arrived, if you were lucky enough to own one, the C8 owner's manual clearly stated that Required Recommended Fuel was 93 octane. The LT2 engine has not changed since it's Day 1 debut. Only the manual verbiage was slightly changed and got GM around their octane warnings by manipulating their wording. Truth of the matter as stated in their 2020 and 2021 owners manual, "If unavailable, 91 May be used, BUT with Reduced performance and fuel economy".
Some associated C8 owners are not interested in maximum engine performance and some are, that's why we are here on the C8 Tech/Performance Discussion.
I was told, by my tuner, that the timing maps were more aggressive in the 2020-21 models and then were scaled back some in the more recent years, hence the verbiage change in the manual. I can't say that's 100% true but it would seem to make sense.
However, if that is true....the 2020 and '21's are potentially the faster C8s.
GM states in the owner's manual that up to 15% ethanol has been approved for use, with that said, a lot of us are running 20-30% to pick up that extra octane and the engine loves it. The sweet spot seems to be ~95-octane with the factory ECU & tuning. I've provided my E85 spash-blend calculator to a few guys, including @teddyca, so if anyone else wants it please just PM me your email address. I have it setup for splash-blending with both 91 E0 as the base fuel, and 93 E10, depending on your area.
To the OP in Iowa, certain Kum & Go locations (soon to be rebranded to Mavericks) do offer 93 E10 at the pump.
I just made the drive from TX to far northern Minnesota in my Jeep and ran E15/Unleaded88 the entire way, and averaged better than expected MPG due to the slight increase in octane/knock quench preventing the ECU from pulling timing as it typically does when running regular 87.
Have been running 88 octane/E15 from QT in all my DD’s and it helps prevent knock as well as makes a little more power because of more advanced timing which results in better mpg when cruising from a more efficient burn I believe. It’s also cheaper than regular 87 octane.
Have been running 88 octane/E15 from QT in all my DD’s and it helps prevent knock as well as makes a little more power because of more advanced timing which results in better mpg when cruising from a more efficient burn I believe. It’s also cheaper than regular 87 octane.
The ecm will not experiment with timing advance if running more than 93 octane. Higher octane in an engine engineered for 91 is a waste of time and effort, been proven over and over for decades. Can't get something for nothing.