When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Never thought I'd be looking forward to another Monday !! Think I'll entertain myself on Marshall's site and read their warranty...
Fingers crossed for ya...
Rich
Hey.....you dang right they don't "owe" me anything more than an exact replacement engine, or full refund. Not that I would be happy with it, but legally, that's all they are responsible for.
But...you think that's wise? Damage control was invented for a reason. Negative press will kill a business, and the internet has more say than some realize. Do I think this will kill their business, of course not, but it surely can't help. They have the opportunity to actually gain customers from this.
If I ran Marshall engines, I would overnight a motor down, send two folks to install it, take pics of me smiling, and use the hell out of it!! Wonder if they are this smart?
I have mentioned this before, but I inquired as to if anyone knew about Marshall/Blueprint Engines before I bought. No one replied that they knew anything about them. Think about how many know of them now. And most are already thinking bad.
But...you think that's wise? Damage control was invented for a reason. Negative press will kill a business, and the internet has more say than some realize. Do I think this will kill their business, of course not, but it surely can't help. They have the opportunity to actually gain customers from this.
If I ran Marshall engines, I would overnight a motor down, send two folks to install it, take pics of me smiling, and use the hell out of it!! Wonder if they are this smart?
There is always more than one way to skin a cat...
BBB data....good one....my gut feel is they take a hard line....but data just for last 36 months....and only covers complaints that were submitted..interesting...
I checked that out before I ordered (actually a member, Brett) posted it in one of my threads asking about them. Seemed like a small rate for the number of engines that they ship, and they had pleased most complaints.
I checked that out before I ordered (actually a member, Brett) posted it in one of my threads asking about them. Seemed like a small rate for the number of engines that they ship, and they had pleased most complaints.
I have bookmarked that site however.
Data only covers customer complaints submitted to BBB......so how many disputes were there,really ???? Not everyone sends complaints to the BBB....
"Yo Mississippi", I see "warden George" finally released you from forum detention. Are you on parole? Is he making you wear one of those GPS tracking ankle bracelets?
MSV...promised to behave hence he got a parole, an early release, 1 day and 9 hours...
If I ran Marshall engines, I would overnight a motor down, send two folks to install it, take pics of me smiling, and use the hell out of it!! Wonder if they are this smart?
That would be just as deceptive has their dyno testing. Sure it would be nice to see a customer smiling and saying how great the engine is. There would be no mention or pictures of the first engine that looks more like a milkshake machine than a chevy small block.
I have mentioned this before, but I inquired as to if anyone knew about Marshall/Blueprint Engines before I bought. No one replied that they knew anything about them. Think about how many know of them now. And most are already thinking bad.
Their loss of business from this thread will be minimal. Almost 60k views and not a mention of anyone else buying an engine from them. I don't really see the CF having a major effect on their day to day operation. I would find it impossible to believe they are going to have to lay off several workers because of this incident and this thread.
Lose business? Probably not. But they sure will lose potential customers, and that means something. Future business=growth=success. This is not exactly a repeat type of market. Most buys are one time.
I will be in the market for a crate engine in about 6 months, before this thread they were on the top of my bookmark list and I would probably bought from them, I won't now no matter what the outcome of this is. I just got a link from another thread about a company called T and L engines. They actually say you get a print of the Dyno results of "your" engine.
I read earlier in this post that Marshall's "Dyno Tested" terminology was confusing or misleading. There is no doubt on this page on Marshall's site concerning dyno testing:
I will be in the market for a crate engine in about 6 months, before this thread they were on the top of my bookmark list and I would probably bought from them, I won't now no matter what the outcome of this is. I just got a link from another thread about a company called T and L engines. They actually say you get a print of the Dyno results of "your" engine.
I read earlier in this post that Marshall's "Dyno Tested" terminology was confusing or misleading. There is no doubt on this page on Marshall's site concerning dyno testing:
They say they don't ship it if it doesn't have enough power. And they say they will ship YOUR actual chart.
I purchased a blueprint engine, not Marshall. They are a owned by Marshall. Blueprint only dyno's the full and complete motor (motors fully dressed with distributor and carb attached). It's deceptive, no doubt.
I purchased a blueprint engine, not Marshall. They are a owned by Marshall. Blueprint only dyno's the full and complete motor (motors fully dressed with distributor and carb attached). It's deceptive, no doubt.
Although a fine distinction and certainly misleading, you can see why they do this. Think about the number of people on this Forum that have had their carbs tuned by Lars. Everyone talks about a night and day difference and that's without changing anything but settings and perhaps a jet or two. It would be impossible and probably even more misleading to tell you that you had a 300 hp engine without a manifold and carb. Then you install it and find that you have the same 190 hp powerhouse that you're replacing.
The way the product manager explained it to me was they can't dyno all the non-dressed motors. They ship way to many, and it's to time consuming and would add considerable cost. They put it on a non-computerized type of dyno and actually verify minimum hp/torque spec's before shipping.
The dressed motors (with carb and distrib.) are all actually dyno'd and shipped with the actual dyno.
P.S: The undressed motors are shipped with intake. Only thing I added were the accessories such as carb, distrib., fuel pump.....
It's still deceiving, and one would assume by the wording that you would be getting an actual dyno with your motor. Why would you think differently? I should have asked, but nothing stuck out at me to ask, so, I was basically deceived by careful wording.
The other wording game is with the 355 motor. It doesn't say 355cc motor. Yet one would assume it to be a 30 over bore. When I question them on receiving a 40 over bore, he said show me where it say you are getting a 30 over bore. Deceived yet again, by careful wording.
These are minor arguments, but shows a somewhat sneaky character of the company, in my opinion.
Last edited by MsVetteMan; Mar 26, 2006 at 12:09 PM.
The way the product manager explained it to me was they can't dyno all the non-dressed motors. They ship way to many, and it's to time consuming and would add considerable cost.
....
I think that this hits it right on the head, though "can't" is the word I question.
It may not be meaningful, and as consumers, we may not be willing to pay for it, but of course they could test each and every one. Again, I'm not sure that I'd be willing to pay for it as an option (realistically it would have to add a few hunderd dollars), but I'd like to have the choice. It would bother me a lot more that I thought that I was getting a dynoed engine, regardless of the value of this, only to find that I missed the fine print.