Comment about the automatic !
I get my fun by going faster, if the 8L90 does it then I'm all in. For those who have fun shifting, go for the manual...I have no intentions of defining how people should derive their pleasure. I really don't understand why there are so many people hell bent on insisting people have to drive a manual because they say so. If they are having so much fun driving a manual, why rent space in your mind worrying about people driving an automatic...relax, live and let live.

This new 8 speed can be great (I hope it will be), or it can suck, time will tell, but if it as terrible as the auto in those cars, it will be a total failure.
Last edited by Gadfly; May 2, 2014 at 01:52 AM.
Acceleration usually favors automatics anyways so the A8 should be a huge win.
I look forward to test driving the 8 speed versus 7 speed to decide for myself.
You ll know rather quickly which you prefer.
Acceleration usually favors automatics anyways so the A8 should be a huge win.
I look forward to test driving the 8 speed versus 7 speed to decide for myself.
You ll know rather quickly which you prefer.

Last edited by johnglenntwo; May 4, 2014 at 08:30 PM.





the manual M5 takes 4.2 seconds to reach 60 mph and 12.5 seconds to pass the quarter mile. The fastest twin-clutch-equipped M5 we tested clocked in at 3.7 seconds to 60 and 11.9 seconds for the quarter mile.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz30nQyON6L
Last edited by johnglenntwo; May 4, 2014 at 08:29 PM.





the manual M5 takes 4.2 seconds to reach 60 mph and 12.5 seconds to pass the quarter mile. The fastest twin-clutch-equipped M5 we tested clocked in at 3.7 seconds to 60 and 11.9 seconds for the quarter mile.
Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...#ixzz30nQyON6L

Why don't you just wait for the actual testing of the car to reveal how it performs instead of embarrassing yourself with this nonsense?
If you're not out there spreading completely incorrect info, you're swinging your feeble strawman at issues that don't exist.
S.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
They really need to get this resolved....a world class sports car with a second rate paddle shift system is a deal breaker in my book, no matter how good the A8 is supposed to be....
Why don't you just wait for the actual testing of the car to reveal how it performs instead of embarrassing yourself with this nonsense?
If you're not out there spreading completely incorrect info, you're swinging your feeble strawman at issues that don't exist.
S.

And I hope your right and they will end up doing really well, but, again there just aren't real good indications of that.
Last edited by johnglenntwo; May 5, 2014 at 01:23 PM.

And I hope your right and they will end up doing really well, but, again there just aren't real good indications of that.

They did it with the whole car up to this point.
the C7 Z51 was enough to Face Trounce the GTR on Willowsprings, it embarrassed the 911 too there for that matter. Hell it keeps up with (and makes a drivers race) with a F12 around Laguna. Both of which are more powerful cars, pretty comfortably.
What makes you think the C7 ZO6 will not continue the tradition of Face Trouncing the competition like the C6 Z, and the C5 Z before it?
Ring times at the moment aren't important for the sales of the C7 Stingray. The car hasn't hit it's "slump" yet. For that matter, all of us know this is just the Base Model, and for all the concerns about handling on the Ring only two things really matter there, Horsepower and Weight. Speeds on the ring are much higher than on most full road courses.
The ZO6, we already know was already a full second and change faster than the outgoing ZR1 on GM's proving ground. That was on it's first lap with no on track feedback to develop the car with. One Second, on a very tight, and cramped track. On it's first lap.
Also, I don't buy the GTR's ring time. If the GTR were really capable of the time on the ring that it were, they'd have sent that sucker straight from the ring to Laguna seca to dethrone the Viper and the ZR1. But they haven't. Infact the current GTR got smoked on edmunds by a Z51 C7... says alot about just how "heroic" that car really is when the base model beat it like a foster child
Last edited by MavsAK; May 5, 2014 at 05:23 PM.
They did it with the whole car up to this point.
the C7 Z51 was enough to Face Trounce the GTR on Willowsprings, it embarrassed the 911 too there for that matter. Hell it keeps up with (and makes a drivers race) with a F12 around Laguna. Both of which are more powerful cars, pretty comfortably.
What makes you think the C7 ZO6 will not continue the tradition of Face Trouncing the competition like the C6 Z, and the C5 Z before it?
Ring times at the moment aren't important for the sales of the C7 Stingray. The car hasn't hit it's "slump" yet. For that matter, all of us know this is just the Base Model, and for all the concerns about handling on the Ring only two things really matter there, Horsepower and Weight. Speeds on the ring are much higher than on most full road courses.
The ZO6, we already know was already a full second and change faster than the outgoing ZR1 on GM's proving ground. That was on it's first lap with no on track feedback to develop the car with. One Second, on a very tight, and cramped track. On it's first lap.
Also, I don't buy the GTR's ring time. If the GTR were really capable of the time on the ring that it were, they'd have sent that sucker straight from the ring to Laguna seca to dethrone the Viper and the ZR1. But they haven't. Infact the current GTR got smoked on edmunds by a Z51 C7... says alot about just how "heroic" that car really is when the base model beat it like a foster child

As far as The Ring probably the mid teens if they do it, which, would put them way ahead of the Porsche turbo S. That would work!

I'm not saying this isn't a much improved car its only that I don't like being wrong and I have predicted very good across the board all things considered! I was thinking the Z07 would be stiffer for road racing, but, it actually makes sense that it isn't as an all around track car.
Last edited by johnglenntwo; May 6, 2014 at 05:26 PM.
Last edited by vettskii; May 14, 2014 at 09:21 AM.
It is very responsive and is an absolute plast to drive.
I didn't even get the NPP or Z51, my Shelby was so loud, this is a pleasure.
Plus the auto is faster than the manual C7 and more consistent.
Just said that to **** you manual guys off, lol.

OOPS, wrong forum
but, automatics are still fun.
However, considering I can overheat the A6 in about 12-14 minutes on an "easy" track like Daytona-Rolex, I am very skeptical that the A8 will really be "track certified" as GM/Tadge is claiming. Very skeptical. This weekend, I'll be at Sebring. 10-15* hotter than Daytona was and a lot harder on hardware. I'd be surprised if I could get in a warmup and 4 hot laps in my A6 C7. I don't even consider taking the it.
IMO, GM is going to have a LOT of convincing to do to make me believe the A8 is really going to be "track certified" for "98 percent" of drivers.
S.






















