When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm never good at figuring out sway bar settings, but I'd like to add 2 points from my experience messing it up:
(1) Front and rear bars should be increased in similar ballpark, or else it makes a 'twisting' effect on the car, and upsets handling. It can even introduce the reverse of expected impact if the difference is too much. In this case, if one goes with a stiff bar like AFE at rear, they should also do so up front, and only then consider making marginal changes (with adjustable bars) for balance.
(2) Very stiff bars often improve road course lap time in my experience, even though people say that stiffer bars reduce traction. Again, I don't know exactly why, but it might be the reduction of lag in car responding to directional changes..
Thanks again for the info!
I don’t have any experience modifying a C8 specifically as the stock Z51 I drove at a pace similar to my car the same day on a 3.1 mile track had stock size 100tw tires on it so felt fine to me, but I only put a bigger front bar on my C6GS initially because I put wider front tires so trying to maintain the neutral grip front to rear. Tire psi, brake pad bias and driver can also induce understeer/oversteer as well though, Happy New Years to all!
So, killing a little time this AM looking at part numbers for sway bars. I was specifically interested in the ZO6 parts. Take these for what they're worth, I spent my life in IT not behind a parts counter and sometimes finding the correct parts number online can be a challenge.
It would appear the base and Z51 share the same front bar, but the Z51 has a different rear bar (stiffer?). Seems I've read a few comments implying the front Z51 bar might be different from the base. Can anyone add something one way or the other on this??
Also, rear bar on base and Z06 are the same, front Z06 is different. This seems to go along with the comments made by GM engineers in a few articles. I'd sure like to understand what the Z06 front bar is rated at. Would a bar softer than base make any sense? Stiffer?
Base
Front 23428455
Rear 23428465
Z51
Front 23428455
Rear 84808976
Z06
Front 85516685
Rear 23428465
Also, can anyone comment on Z06 handling as compared to base models?
So, killing a little time this AM looking at part numbers for sway bars. I was specifically interested in the ZO6 parts. Take these for what they're worth, I spent my life in IT not behind a parts counter and sometimes finding the correct parts number online can be a challenge.
It would appear the base and Z51 share the same front bar, but the Z51 has a different rear bar (stiffer?). Seems I've read a few comments implying the front Z51 bar might be different from the base. Can anyone add something one way or the other on this??
Also, rear bar on base and Z06 are the same, front Z06 is different. This seems to go along with the comments made by GM engineers in a few articles. I'd sure like to understand what the Z06 front bar is rated at. Would a bar softer than base make any sense? Stiffer?
Base
Front 23428455
Rear 23428465
Z51
Front 23428455
Rear 84808976
Z06
Front 85516685
Rear 23428465
Also, can anyone comment on Z06 handling as compared to base models?
Not as simple as just looking at bar rates across the models as they dont function independently of rest of the suspension. Spring rates get progressively higher as you go up in models potentially requiring less sway bar for same end result. Tire sizes also change for the Z06 increasing more in the rear than the front (+30mm front and +40mm rear). Would be important to compare spring rate of each combination to understand bar rate used.
I'm surprised by the fitment problem with the Eibach swaybar. Does anyone know why the bars ends weren't widened a bit more?
I havent seen anyone post results of Eibach endlinks with the Eibach bars, they may work fine together. The example shown with the endlinks was the AFE bars and the front had the issue of less than ideal alignment with the aftermarket endlink. I did not check to see if my AFE bar was the exact length as my stock bar in the front.
Not as simple as just looking at bar rates across the models as they dont function independently of rest of the suspension. Spring rates get progressively higher as you go up in models potentially requiring less sway bar for same end result. Tire sizes also change for the Z06 increasing more in the rear than the front (+30mm front and +40mm rear). Would be important to compare spring rate of each combination to understand bar rate used.
I hear you, wish I just knew a bit more about mixing and matching parts LOL. I'm installing Z06 springs (no MSRC) and larger rims/tires with 275/30/19 on 9.5", 325/30/19 on 12". Seems like matching the bars to the springs makes some sense. If the rears are the same, the front Z06 bar is $100 and uses the same end links as the base. Seems cheap enough to give it a try. Still don't know about loosening up that front subframe though.
Still don't know about loosening up that front subframe though.
If you have or can find someone with a lift it wasnt bad. I didnt have to remove any of the subframe bolts completely to get the AFE bar in. Needed about 1.5" of space though and took some time to snake it through.
I'd say keep the stiffer Z51 bars. Your FE3 shocks will be underdampened for the stiffer Z06 springs anyway. The stiffer sway bar would only help in my opinion.
I'd say keep the stiffer Z51 bars. Your FE3 shocks will be underdampened for the stiffer Z06 springs anyway. The stiffer sway bar would only help in my opinion.
I'm afraid my car is a base without Z51, but will have the FE3 shocks with Z06 springs shortly. The notion that the front Z06 bar is smaller than base just makes no sense to me. I wonder if they left the front Z06 springs a bit softer requiring a larger bar than the base/Z51 front bar? I reviewed the specs and the spring wire diameter is different, 0.59 versus 0.63 between the two. Looking at the two springs they look pretty close to each other (height aside). Food for thought I guess. I am sending Z06 springs and Z51 shocks out tomorrow to Speedway for testing.
So, killing a little time this AM looking at part numbers for sway bars. I was specifically interested in the ZO6 parts. Take these for what they're worth, I spent my life in IT not behind a parts counter and sometimes finding the correct parts number online can be a challenge.
It would appear the base and Z51 share the same front bar, but the Z51 has a different rear bar (stiffer?). Seems I've read a few comments implying the front Z51 bar might be different from the base. Can anyone add something one way or the other on this??
Also, rear bar on base and Z06 are the same, front Z06 is different. This seems to go along with the comments made by GM engineers in a few articles. I'd sure like to understand what the Z06 front bar is rated at. Would a bar softer than base make any sense? Stiffer?
Base
Front 23428455
Rear 23428465
Z51
Front 23428455
Rear 84808976
Z06
Front 85516685
Rear 23428465
Also, can anyone comment on Z06 handling as compared to base models?
I’ve driven a base model C8 on local shorter 1.7 mi course and rode shotgun in C8Z07 on the same track with an advanced driver. The all season tires don’t have near the grip obviously of the Cup2Rs, but it’s all about the combination of the tires/suspension of course. I’d say run the car with the new combination wheels/tires first and then make suspension changes to dial it in rather than making multiple changes at once. I figure you fine tune sway bars once the tires and springs are chosen. I’m curious what PTM mode you run in as everything off would be the best way to really assess the handling I’d think?
I'm afraid my car is a base without Z51, but will have the FE3 shocks with Z06 springs shortly. The notion that the front Z06 bar is smaller than base just makes no sense to me. I wonder if they left the front Z06 springs a bit softer requiring a larger bar than the base/Z51 front bar? I reviewed the specs and the spring wire diameter is different, 0.59 versus 0.63 between the two. Looking at the two springs they look pretty close to each other (height aside). Food for thought I guess. I am sending Z06 springs and Z51 shocks out tomorrow to Speedway for testing.
I have used a lot of Hyperco springs on different coilover set ups ranging from 250-750lb. They did not physically look any different. I would not read anything into spring rates based on coil diameter or anything like that. Will be interesting what you find out on measured rate. From what I have seen written, z51 is about 30% stiffer than base as z06 is about 30% stiffer than z51. Curious if that’s true.
I am running very high rate springs (700lb front and 750lb rear I believe) with stiffer afe bars and love the way it handles. My shock is set up to handle these rates though.
Below are Viper rates. Even though ACR's spring rates are much higher than other models', they did not feel the need to soften it up. This is similar to my experience playing with these things on cars like Miata, etc., too; stiff sway bars are great for track. I don't know GM's reasons, but they might have softened it up on Z06 to make it a more comfortable ride, which is not my priority at all...
I have used a lot of Hyperco springs on different coilover set ups ranging from 250-750lb. They did not physically look any different. I would not read anything into spring rates based on coil diameter or anything like that. Will be interesting what you find out on measured rate. From what I have seen written, z51 is about 30% stiffer than base as z06 is about 30% stiffer than z51. Curious if that’s true.
I am running very high rate springs (700lb front and 750lb rear I believe) with stiffer afe bars and love the way it handles. My shock is set up to handle these rates though.
What tires do you run as that’s a big determining factor isn’t it? I don’t consider 700/750 high for a C8 being it’s not exactly light, I run 700/650 on my C6GS with 200tw tires and no aero which I kept it on the softer side as some tracks like Hallett are not very smooth plus I like to autocross.
Originally Posted by X25
Below are Viper rates. Even though ACR's spring rates are much higher than other models', they did not feel the need to soften it up. This is similar to my experience playing with these things on cars like Miata, etc., too; stiff sway bars are great for track. I don't know GM's reasons, but they might have softened it up on Z06 to make it a more comfortable ride, which is not my priority at all...
The big reason for the ACR having ~double the spring rate of the other Viper models is the Kumho tires and downforce I thought? The difference in Z07 and Z06 on the C8 is spring rate and sway bar bushings to handle the aero and tires right?
What tires do you run as that’s a big determining factor isn’t it? I don’t consider 700/750 high for a C8 being it’s not exactly light, I run 700/650 on my C6GS with 200tw tires and no aero which I kept it on the softer side as some tracks like Hallett are not very smooth plus I like to autocross.
i had only run one event with those shocks and sways so far in the c8 and was on stock ps4 and stock brakes with carbotech 12/10. I now have wider tires (100tw) Nankang AR-1 295 front 325 rear and am installing AP Brakes. I haven’t had a chance to play with spring rate yet but likely will in 2024 season so we will see where I end up.
last car was an AC cobra that weight about 2500# and I ran R7 with similar spring rates to these. Worked really well.
Thanks for your posting as it points out that the swaybar is just ONE part of a suspension system. Suspensions needed to be looked at for Wheel-Rate: the Spring and the Swaybar.....and that's before shock absorbers are brought into the equation